Text classification with the support of pruned dependency patterns

Pattern Recognition Letters

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1598-1607

  Özgür, Levent ^a   Güngör, Tunga ^a  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Lexical dependency; Pruning analysis; Reuters 21578; Text classification

Indexed keywords

BAG OF WORDS; DATA SETS; FEATURE VECTORS; LEXICAL DEPENDENCY; LOW FREQUENCY; OPTIMAL LEVEL; PARAMETER-TUNING; REUTERS-21578; TEXT CLASSIFICATION;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 77955558323     PISSN: 01678655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2010.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Asuncion, A.; Newman, D.; 2007. UCI Machine Learning Repository. University of California, School of Information and Computer Science, Irvine, CA. .
2. Basili, R.; Pazienza, M.T.; Mazzucchelli, L.; 2000. An adaptive and distributed framework for advanced IR. In: Proc. Internat. Conf. on Adaptivity, Personalization and Fusion of Heterogeneous Information (RIAO 2000), pp. 908-922.
3. Cahill, A.; Heid, U.; Rohrer, C.; Weller, M.; 2009. Using tri-lexical dependencies in LFG parse disambiguation. In: The 14th Internat. LFG Conf.; Cambridge.
4. Charniak, E, Knight, K.; Yamada, K.; 2003. Syntax-based language models for statistical machine translation. In: Proc. MT Summit IX. Internat. Association for Machine Translation.
5. G. Forman An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification J. Machine Learn. Res. 3 2003 1289 1305
6. Furnkranz, J.; Mitchell, T.; Rilof, E.; 1998. A case study in using linguistic phrases for text categorization on the WWW. In: AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization.
7. M. Ghanem, Y. Guo, H. Lodhi, and Y. Zhang Automatic scientific text classification using local patterns ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 4 2 2002 95 96
8. J. Herrera, A. Penas, and F. Verdejo Textual entailment recognition based on dependency analysis and WordNet Proc. PASCAL Challenges Workshop on Recognising Textual Entailment Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 3944 2006 Springer Berlin, Heidelberg
9. T. Joachims Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning 1999 MIT Press
10. D. Klein, and C. Manning Fast exact inference with a factored model for natural language parsing Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 15 2003 MIT Press Cambridge
11. König, A.C.; Brill.; E.; 2006. Reducing the human overhead in text categorization. In: Proc. 12th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Philadelphia, USA, pp. 598-603.
12. R. Larson, and B. Farber Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World 2000 Prentice Hall
13. Lewis, D.D.; 1992. An evaluation of phrasal and clustered representations on a text categorization task. In: Proc. 15th Annual Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 37-50.
14. Liu, T.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, B.; Ma, W.; Wu, G.; 2004. Improving text classification using local latent semantic indexing. In: Proc. Fourth IEEE Internat. Conf. on Data Mining.
15. H. Lodhi, C. Saunders, J. Shawe-Taylor, N. Christianini, and C. Watkins Text classification using string kernels J. Machine Learn. Res. 2 2002 419 444
16. C. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schütze Introduction to Information Retrieval 2008 Cambridge University Press
17. Marneffe, M.C.; MacCartney, B.; Manning, C.; 2006. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In: Proc. Internat. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), Genoa, Italy, pp. 449-454.
18. Douglas C. Montgomery Design and Analysis of Experiments 2001 John Wiley
19. Moschitti, A.; 2008. Kernel methods, syntax and semantics for relational text categorization. In: Proc. ACM 17th Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), Napa Valley, California.
20. Moschitti, A.; Basili, R.; 2004. Complex linguistic features for text classification. In: Proc. European Conf. on Information Retrieval (ECIR 2004), pp. 181-196.
21. Mullen, T.; Collier, N.; 2004. Sentiment analysis using support vector machines with diverse information sources. In: Proc. Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2004).
22. Nastase, V.; Shirabad, J.S.; Caropreso, M.F.; 2006. Using dependency relations for text classification. In: Proc. Nineteenth Canadian Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Quebec, Canada.
23. A. Özgür, L. Özgür, and T. Güngör Text categorization with class-based and corpus-based keyword selection Proc. 20th Internat. Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences (ISCIS 2005) Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 3733 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg 606 615
24. Özgür, L.; Güngör, T.; 2009. Analysis of stemming alternatives and dependency pattern support in text classification. In: Proc. Tenth Internat. Conf. on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing 2009), Mexico City.
25. M. Porter An algorithm for suffix stripping Program 14 3 1980 130 137
26. S.E. Robertson, S. Walker, and M. Beaulieu Experimentation as a way of life: Okapi at TREC Inform. Process. Manage. 36 2000 95 108
27. G. Salton, and C. Buckley Term weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval Inform. Process. Manage. 24 5 1988 513 523
28. G. Salton, C.S. Yang, and A. Wong A vector-space model for automatic indexing Commun. ACM 18 11 1975 613 620
29. Stevenson, M.; Greenwood, M.; 2005. A semantic approach to IE pattern induction. In: Proc. 43rd Annual Meeting of the ACL, Ann Arbor.
30. Stevenson, M.; Greenwood, M.; 2006. Comparing information extraction pattern models. In: Proc. Workshop on Information Extraction Beyond the Document, Sydney, pp. 12-19.
31. Z. Wang, and D. Zhang Feature selection in text classification via SVM and LSI Proc. Third Internat. Symposium on Neural Networks (ISNN 2006) 2006 Springer-Verlag 1381 1386
32. Wellner, B.; Pustejovsky, J.D.; Havasi, C.; Rumshisky, A.; Sauri, R.; 2006. Classification of discourse coherence relations: An exploratory study using multiple knowledge sources. In: Proc. SIGdial Workshop On Discourse and Dialogue, Sydney, pp.117-125.
33. Yang, Y.; Liu, X.; 1999. A re-examination of text categorization methods. In: Proc. 22nd ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Berkeley, pp. 42-49.