Design review in a post-colonial city: The Delhi Urban Art Commission

Cities

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 397-404

  Agrawal, Sandeep Kumar ^a  

^a RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Delhi Urban Art Commission; Design review; India; Post colonial city

Indexed keywords

ART; POST-COLONIALISM; URBAN DESIGN; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

DELHI; INDIA;

HARNESS;

EID: 77955557550     PISSN: 02642751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2010.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Agrawal S., Ladouceur E. Design review: lessons for Toronto. Plan Canada 2007, 47(1):32-35.
2. Averley, J (2005) Design Review Symposium: Toward a " Made in Toronto Solution." June 29. (accessed 01.11.10). http://www.toronto.ca/planning/designreviewpanel_symposium.htm.
3. Beasley, L (2005) Design Review Symposium: Toward a " Made in Toronto Solution." June 29. (accessed 01.11.10). http://www.toronto.ca/planning/designreviewpanel_symposium.htm.
4. CABE (2006) Design Review: How CABE Evaluates Quality in Architecture and Urban Design. The Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE). (accessed 01.11.10). http://www.cabe.org.uk/.
5. City of Cincinnati (2009). (accessed 01.11.10). http://www.cincinnati-oh.gov/transeng/pages/-7070-/.
6. City of Vancouver (2009). (accessed 01.11.10). http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/civicagencies/udp/index.htm.
7. Delhi Urban Art Commission (1996) Annual Report 1995-96. Delhi Urban Art Commission.
8. Delhi Urban Art Commission (1997) Annual Report 1996-97. Delhi Urban Art Commission.
9. Delhi Urban Art Commission (1999) Annual Report 1998-99. Delhi Urban Art Commission.
10. Delhi Urban Art Commission (2000) Annual Report 1999-2000. Delhi Urban Art Commission.
11. Delhi Urban Art Commission (2002) Annual Report 2001-2002. Delhi Urban Art Commission.
12. Delhi Urban Art Commission (2004) Annual Report 2003-2004. Delhi Urban Art Commission.
13. Jagtap R., Kumar H., Patil V., Purnedu V., Sharma V., Srisoma K. Do we need the Delhi Urban Art Commission?. Seminars on Architecture 2006, 25-37. School of Planning and Architecture, Delhi. M. Chatterjee, R. Mittal (Eds.).
14. Jha L.K. DUAC not meeting its objective, feel experts. The Hindu 2004, 25(August).
15. Kahn J. Amnesty plan for relics of the Raj. New York Times 2007, 30(December).
16. Kumar S. Canadian urban design practice: a review of urban design regulations. Canadian Journal of Urban Research 2002, 11(2):239-263.
17. Kumar S. Decision-making in urban design: a study of the Ontario Municipal Board decisions in Toronto. Canadian Journal of Urban Research 2005, 14(2):209-237.
18. May H. Urban design review in Cincinnati. Design Review: Challenging Urban Aesthetic Control 1994, 119-132. Chapman & Hall, New York. W. Preiser, B. Scheer (Eds.).
19. Menon, AGK (2004) The contemporary architecture of Delhi: a critical history. Architexturez. (accessed 01.11.10). http://www.Architexturez.net.
20. Prakash Satya Supreme Court raps Delhi High Court activism. The Hindustan Times 2007, 10(December).
21. Punter J. Improving the instruments, processes and products of aesthetic control in Europe. Urban Design International 1999, 4(1 & 2):79-99.
22. Punter J. Aesthetic control/design control in the United Kingdom. Urban Design International 1999, 4(1 & 2):67-75.
23. Punter J. From design advice to peer review: the role of the urban design panel in Vancouver. Journal of Urban Design 2003, 8(2):113-135.
24. Punter J. Developing urban design as public policy: best practice principles for design review and development management. Journal of Urban Design 2007, 12(2):167-202.
25. Qadeer, M (2009) Cities we could have, but don't. Mimeograph.
26. Sachdeva S.D. A mess of our own making. The Times of India 2005, 6(August).
27. Sharma A. Urban chawl: nothing aesthetic about Delhi. The Hindustan Times 2003, 28(September):45-654.
28. Sharma R. The sacking of Delhi. The Hindustan Times 2003, 3(October):7-89.
29. Sharma A. Rise, fall and rise of a memorial. The Hindustan Times 2006, 6(June).
30. Sharma J., Prabhakar J. Dirty designs on Delhi. The Times of India 2004, 9(July).
31. Singh M.K. Structure didn't blend with LBZ vista. The Times of India 2006, 20(May).
32. Singh P. Delhi defiled. The Hindustan Times 1996, 5(November).
33. Singh P. New aesthetic guidelines for city development. Delhi: The Deepening Urban Crisis 1989, 115-124. Sterling Publishers, New Delhi. P. Singh, R. Dhimja (Eds.).
34. Sinha S. Lutyens' dream for Delhi may turn sour. The Times of India 2003, 16(August).
35. Sinha S. Another India Gate on the cards?. The Times of India 2005, 18(August).
36. Times of India HC stalls construction of police memorial. The Times of India 2004, 22(July).
37. Times of India Master violation: High Court wants to see all files on police memorial. The Times of India 2005, 21(May).
38. Times of India Editorial: citizens versus VIPs. The Times of India 2007, 2(November).
39. Times of India On its way out, DUAC panel resigns. The Times of India 2008, 21(February).
40. Tribune News Service DUAC " sidelined" in drafting Plan 2021. The Tribune 2005, 22(February).