Modeling and segmentation of audio descriptor profiles with segmental models

Pattern Recognition Letters

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1507-1513

  Bloit, Julien ^a   Rasamimanana, Nicolas ^a   Bevilacqua, Frédéric ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Audio descriptors; Hidden Markov models; Music; Profiles; Segmental models; Segmentation

Indexed keywords

AUDIO DESCRIPTORS; DATA SETS; DESCRIPTORS; FINE STRUCTURES; NUMBER OF STATE; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; TEMPORAL PROFILE;

AUDIO ACOUSTICS; DATA PROCESSING;

HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS;

EID: 77955555023     PISSN: 01678655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2009.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. T. Artires, S. Marukatat, and P. Gallinari Online handwritten shape recognition using segmental hidden Markov models IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 29 2007 205 217
2. Bevilacqua, F.; Rasamimanana, N.; Fléty, E.; Lemouton, S.; Baschet, F.; 2006. The augmented violin project: Research, composition and performance report. In: Proc. Internat. Conf. on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME).
3. Bloit, J.; Rodet, X.; Mars, 2008. Short-time Viterbi for online HMM decoding: Evaluation on a real-time phone recognition task. In: ICASSP. Las Vegas.
4. Bloit, J.; Rasamimanana, N.; Bevilacqua, F.; 2009. Towards morphological sound description using segmental models. In: DAFX. Como, Italy.
5. P. Bootz, and X. Hautbois Les motifs temporels paramétrés [configuration of temporal motives] E. Rix, M. Formosa, Vers une sémiotique générale du temps dans les arts, Actes du colloque les Unités Sémiotiques Temporelles (UST), nouvel outil d'analyse musicale: Théories et Applications [Toward a General Semiotics of Time in Arts. Proceeding of Temporal Semiotic Units (TSU), New Tools for Musical Analyses: Theory and Applications] 2007 Delatour-France Sampzon 139 176
6. Chion, M.; 1983. Guide des objets sonores. INA/GRM, Buchet/Chastel.
7. Cont, A.; in press. A coupled duration-focused architecture for realtime music to score alignment. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell.
8. Cont, A.; Schwarz, D.; Schnell, N.; Raphael, C.; 2007. Evaluation of real-time audio-to-score alignment. In: Internat. Symp. on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR). Vienna, Austria.
9. A. de Cheveigné, and H. Kawahara Yin, a fundamental frequency estimator for speech and music J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 111 4 2002 1917 1930
10. L. Deng, M. Aksmanovic, X. Sun, and C. Wu Speech recognition using hidden Markov models with polynomial regression functions as nonstationary states IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2 4 1994 507 520
11. Desain, P.; Honing, H.; 1992. Time functions function best as functions of multiple times. Comput. Music J. 16 (2), 17-34. .
12. A. Frey, C. Marie, L. Prod'Homme, M. Timsit-Berthier, D. Schön, and M. Besson Temporal semiotic units as minimal meaningful units in music? An electrophysiological approach Music Perception 26 3 2008 247 256
13. X. Ge, and P. Smyth Deformable Markov model templates for time-series pattern matching SIGKDD 2000 ACM Press 81 90
14. Z. Ghahramani An introduction to hidden Markov models and bayesian networks Internat. J. Pattern Recognition Artif. Intell. 15 2001 9 42
15. J. Grey Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 61 1977 1270 1277
16. Kaltenecker, M.; 2001. Avec Helmut Lachenmann. Van Dieren, Paris.
17. S. Mcadams, S. Winsberg, S. Donnadieu, G. De Soete, and J. Krimphoff Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: Common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes Psychol. Res. 58 1995 177 192
18. Möller, M.; 2009. New sounds for flute. (accessed 05.04.09).
19. B. Moore, B. Glasberg, and T. Baer A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness, and partial loudness J. Audio Eng. Soc. 45 4 1997 224 240
20. Morris, A.; Payne, S.; Bourlard, H.; 2002. Low cost duration modelling for noise robust speech recognition. In: ICSLP. pp. 1025-1028.
21. M. Ostendorf, V. Digalakis, and O.A. Kimball From HMMs to segment models: A unified view of stochastic modeling for speech recognition IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 4 1996 360 378
22. Peeters, G.; Deruty, E.; 2008. Automatic morphological description of sounds. In: Acoustics 08. SFA, Paris.
23. Rabiner, L.; 1989. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. In: Proc. IEEE. pp. 257-286.
24. C. Raphael Automatic segmentation of acoustic musical signals using hidden Markov models IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 21 4 1999 360 370
25. Ricard, J.; Herrera, P.; 2004. Morphological sound description computational model and usability evaluation. In: AES Convention.
26. M. Russell Reducing computational load in segmental hidden Markov model decoding for speech recognition Electron. Lett. 41 25 2005 1408 1409
27. M. Ryynänen, and A. Klapuri Automatic transcription of melody, bass line, and chords in polyphonic music Comput. Music J. 32 3 2008 72 86
28. Schaeffer, P.; 1966. Traité des objets musicaux. Seuil.
29. Schaeffer, P.; Reibel, G.; Ferreyra, B.; 1967. Solfge de l'objet sonore. INA/GRM.
30. D. Smalley Spectromorphology: Explaining sound-shapes Org. Sound 2 1997 107 126
31. L. Tóth, and A. Kocsor On naive Bayes in speech recognition Internat. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 15 2 2005 287 294
32. Vogel, B.; Jordan, M.; Wessel, D.; 2005. Multi-instrument musical transcription using a dynamic graphical model. In: Proc. Internat. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).
33. Young, S.; Evermann, G.; Gales, M.; Hain, T.; Kershaw, D.; Liu, X.; Moore, G.; Odell, J.; Ollason, D.; Povey, D.; Valtchev, V.; Woodland, P.; 2006. The HTK Book (for HTK Version 3.4). Cambridge University Engineering Department.