Social and economic implications of agroforestry for rural economic development in temperate regions

Ecological Basis of Agroforestry

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 303-318

  Doyle, Chris J ^a   Waterhouse, Tony ^a  

^a SCOTTISH AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955550236     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Appleton, Z. 1990. The impact of the Farm Woodland Scheme in Scotland. Scottish Agricultural Economics Review 5:145-147.
2. Appleton, Z. and J.R. Crabtree. 1991. The Farm Woodland Scheme in Scotland: An Economic Appraisal. Aberdeen, UK: Scottish Agricultural College.
3. Bell, S. 2000. Agroforestry in the landscape. In Agroforestry in the UK, ed. M. Hislop and J. Claridge, 91-96. Edinburgh, UK: Forestry Commission.
4. Binning, C., B. Baker, S. Meharg, S. Cork and A. Keans. 2002. Making Farm Forestry Pay-Markets for Ecosystem Services. Kingston, ACT, Australia: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.
5. Bishop, R.D. 1990. Multi-Purpose Woodlands in the Countryside around Towns. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading.
6. Borsboom, A.C., J. Wang, N. Lees, M. Mathieson and L. Hogan. 2002. Measurement and Integration of Fauna Biodiversity Values in Queensland Agroforestry Systems. Kingston, ACT, Australia: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation and the Natural Heritage Trust.
7. Buck, L.E. 1995. Agroforestry policy issues and research directions in the US and less developed countries: insights and challenges from recent experience. Agroforestry Systems 30:57-73.
8. Bullock, C.H., D.C. Macmillan and J.R. Crabtree. 1994. New perspectives on agroforestry in lowland Britain. Land Use Policy 11:222-233.
9. Bulman, P.A. 1991. TREEPLAN-a model to compare farm tree designs in Southern Australia. Agricultural System and Information Technology Newsletter 3:16-18.
10. Burgess, P.J. 1999. Effects of agroforestry on farm biodiversity in the UK. Scottish Forestry 53:24-27.
11. Campbell White & Associates and A. Black. 1999. Practical Farm Forestry: Whole Farm Case Studies. Kingston, ACT: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.
12. Central Statistical Office. 1997. Annual Abstract of Statistics 1996. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
13. Clason, T.R. 1995. Economic implications of silvipastures on southern pine plantations. Agroforestry Systems 29:227-238.
14. Dangerfield, C.W. and R.L. Harwell. 1990. An analysis of a silvopastoral system for the marginal land in the southeast United States. Agroforestry Systems 10:187-197.
15. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 2001. DEFRA-Economics and Statistics. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. http://statistics.defra.gov.uk=esg=datasets= apiyear.xls
16. Dibden, C. and D. Uzzell. 1992. Access and the Woodland Manager; A Study of Woodland Managers Perceptions of and Attitudes Towards Access in Oxfordshire. Guildford, UK: Department of Psychology, University of Surrey.
17. Doyle, C.J. 2002. Role of agroforestry in rural economic development. The UK Agroforestry Forum Newsletter 2:2-4.
18. Doyle, C. and T. Thomas. 2000. The social implications of agroforestry. In Agroforestry in the UK, ed. M. Hislop and J. Claridge, 3-6. Forestry Commission Bulletin 122. Edinburgh, UK: Forestry Commission, pp. 3-6.
19. Doyle, C.J., J. Evans and J. Rossiter. 1986. Agroforestry: an economic appraisal of the benefits of intercropping trees with grassland in lowland Britain. Agricultural Systems 21:1-32.
20. Dupraz, C. 1994. Le chêne et le blé: L’agroforesterie peut-elle intéresser les exploitations européennes de grande cultures? Revue Forestière Française 46:84-95.
21. Dupraz, C. and M. Lagacherie 1990. Culture de feurllus à bais précieux en vergers pâturés sur des terres agricoles du Languedoc-Roussillon: le réseau expérimental APPEL. Forêt Méditerranéenne 12(4):447-457.
22. Dupraz, C. and S.M. Newman. 1997. Temperate agroforestry: the European way. In Temperate Agroforestry Systems, ed. A.M. Gordon and S.M. Newman, 181-236. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
23. Dupraz, C., D. Auclair and J.L. Guitton. 1992. Vingt ans de recherche agroforestière en Nouvelle Zélande. Revue Forestière Française 44:523-538.
24. Dupraz, C., M. Lagacherie, F. Liagre and A. Boutland. 1995. Perspectives de Diversification par l’Agro- Foresterie des Exploitations Agricoles de la Région Midi-Pyrénées. Final research report commissioned by the Council Régional Midi-Pyrénées. Montpellier, France: INRA.
25. Etherington, D.M. and P.J. Matthews. 1983. Approaches to the economic evaluation of agroforestry farming systems. Agroforestry Systems 1:347-360.
26. Forestry Commission. 2001. Coniferous Standing Sales Price Index. London: Forestry Commission. http:// www.forestry.gov.uk=pdf=csspi0901.pdf=FILE=csspi0901.pdf
27. Garrett, H.E., J.E. Jones, W.B. Kurtz and J.P. Slusher 1991. Black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) agroforestry-its design and potential as a land use alternative. The Forestry Chronicle 67:213-218.
28. Garrett, H.E., L.E. Buck, M.A. Gold, L.H. Hardesty, W.B. Kurtz, J.P. Lassoie, H.A. Pearson and J.P. Slusher.Agroforestry: An Integrated Land-Use Management System for Production and Farmland Conservation. Washington, DC: USDA.
29. Garrod, G.D. and K.G. Willis. 1992. The amenity value of woodland in Great Britain. Environmental and Resource Economics 2:415-434.
30. Gasson, R. and P. Hill. 1990. An Economic Evaluation of the Farm Woodland Scheme. Wye, UK: Wye College, University of London.
31. Hanley, N. and C. Spash. 1993. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
32. Hislop, M. and J. Claridge. 2000. Agroforestry in the UK. Forestry Commission Bulletin 122. Edinburgh, UK: Forestry Commission.
33. Hislop, M. and F. Sinclair. 2000. Introduction. In Agroforestry in the UK, ed. M. Hislop and J. Claridge, 3-6. Forestry Commission Bulletin 122. Edinburgh, UK: Forestry Commission.
34. House of Commons Environment Committee. 1993. Forestry and the Environment, Vol 1. London: HMSO.
35. Joannides, J. 1998. Building foundations for improved management of agricultural lands. Agroforestry Forum 9(1):3-6.
36. Johnson, J.A. 1992. A harvest of discontent: some perceptions of the impacts on lowland forest management of the fiscal change of 1998. Quarterly Journal of Forestry 86:150-162.
37. Knowles, R.L. and G. West. 1988. Using the radiata pine agroforestry model. In Proceedings of the Agroforestry Symposium, Rotorua 24-27 November 1986, ed. P. Maclaren, 183-189. Rotorua, New Zealand: Forestry Research Institute.
38. Knowles, R.L., B. Manley and J. Thomson. 1991. FRI Modeling Systems Help Evaluate Profitability of Agroforestry. What’s New in Forest Research? No. 207. Rotorua, New Zealand: Forest Research Institute.
39. Kurtz, W.B., H.E. Garrett and W.H. Kincaid. 1984. Investment alternatives for black walnut management. Journal of Forestry 82:605-608.
40. Kurtz, W.R., S.E. Thurman, M.J. Manson and H.E. Garrett. 1991. The use of agroforestry to control erosionfinancial aspects. Forestry Chronicle 67:254-257.
41. Kurtz, W.R., H.E. Garrett, J.P. Slusher and D.B. Osburn. 1996. Economics of Agroforestry. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri.
42. Lloyd, C.J. 1990. Ecological and environmental consequences: are they a limitation or an incentive to agroforestry? In Marginal Agricultural and Efficient Afforestation, ed. L. Bock and J. Rondeaux, 3-10. CEC Report EUR 10841. Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the European Communities.
43. Loane, W. 1991. Economic Evaluation of Farm Trees-Methodology and Data for FARMTREE Model. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Department of Agriculture and Department of Conservation and Environment.
44. Matthews, S., S.M. Pease, A.M. Gordon and P.A. Williams. 1993. Landowner perceptions and the adoption of agroforestry practices in Southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforestry Systems 21:159-168.
45. McAdam, J. 2000. Environmental aspects. In Agroforestry in the UK, ed. M. Hislop and J. Claridge, 83-90. Forestry Commission Bulletin 122. Edinburgh, UK: Forestry Commission.
46. McAdam, J.H., G. Gazeau and F. Pont. 1997. An assessment of farmer attitudes to agroforestry on sheep and cereal farms in Northern Ireland. Agroforestry Forum 8(3):5-8.
47. McKnight, G.M. 1996. Controlled grazing in woodlands: benefits for conservation and farmers. Agroforestry Forum 7(3):10-13.
48. Mercer, D.E. and R.P. Miller. 1998. Socioeconomic research in agroforestry: progress, prospects, priorities. Agroforestry Systems 38:177-193.
49. Moore, R.W. and P.R. Bird. 1997. Agroforestry systems in temperate Australia. In Temperate Agroforestry Systems, ed. A.M. Gordon and S.M. Newman, 119-148. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
50. Newman, S.M. and A.M. Gordon. 1997. Temperate agroforestry: synthesis and future directions. In Temperate Agroforestry Systems, ed. A.M. Gordon and S.M. Newman, 251-266. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
51. Nix, J. 1984. Farm Management Pocketbook. 15th ed. Wye, Kent: Farm Business Unit, Wye College, University of London.
52. Pearce, D. 1991. Forestry Expansion-A Study of Technical, Economic and Ecological Factors: Assessing the Returns to the Economy and Society from Investments in Forestry. Occasional Paper 47. Edinburgh, UK: Forestry Commission.
53. Ritson, C. 1978. Agricultural Economics: Principles and Policy. London: Granada Publishing.
54. Scambler, A. 1989. Farmers’ attitudes towards forestry. Scottish Geographical Magazine 105:47-49.
55. Sheldrick, R. and D. Auclair. 2000. Origins of agroforestry and recent history in the UK. In Agroforestry in the UK, ed. M. Hislop and J. Claridge, 7-16. Forestry Commission Bulletin 122. Edinburgh, UK: Forestry Commission.
56. Sidwell, L.M. 1989. Farm woodlands in Scotland-some results of a survey. Scottish Agricultural Economics Review 4:103-108.
57. Sibbald, A.R. 1990. The silvopastoral national network experiment. Agroforestry in the UK 1(1):5-10.
58. Sibbald, A. and B. Agnew. 1995. Silvopastoral national network experiment-annual report, 1994. Agroforestry Forum 6(1):5-8.
59. Sinclair, F., W. Eason and J. Hooker. 2000. Understanding and management of interactions. In Agroforestry in the UK, ed. M. Hislop and J. Claridge, 12-28. Edinburgh, UK: Forestry Commission.
60. Slee, B. and P. Snowdon. 1996. An economic appraisal of rural development forestry in Scotland. Scottish Agricultural Economics Review 9:9-19.
61. Spash, C. and N. Hanley. 1994. Preferences, Information and Biodiversity Preservation. Discussion paper in ecological economics 94=1. Stirling, UK: University of Stirling.
62. Swain, P.J. 1987. Farm Forestry: A Study of Aspects of Farm Forestry in New Zealand, Denmark, Sweden, Finland and California. Aberystwyth, UK: ADAS=WOAD.
63. Thomas, T.H. 1990. Evaluating the economics of temperate agroforestry using sensitivity analysis: a case study of poplar, cereals and livestock in the lowlands of the Welsh Borders. In Marginal Agricultural Land and Efficient Afforestation, ed. L. Bock and R.J. Rondeaux, 103-127. CEC Report EUR 10841. Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the European Communities.
64. Thomas, T.H. 1991. A spreadsheet approach to the evaluation of the economics of temperate agroforestry. Forest Ecology and Management 45:207-235.
65. Thomas, T.H. and R.W. Willis. 1997. Agroforestry Research and Development in the United Kingdom. Progress, Perceptions and Attitudes, A Review. Report to the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Bangor, UK: School of Agriculture and Forest Sciences, University of Wales.
66. Thomas, T.H. and R.W. Willis. 2000. The economics of agroforestry in the UK. In Agroforestry in the UK, Forestry Commission Bulletin 122, ed. M. Hislop and J. Claridge, 107-125. Edinburgh, UK: Forestry Commission.
67. Thomas, T.H., R. Penaloza and J.D. Kellas. 1990. Temperate agroforestry systems for northern Europe: some lessons from New Zealand, Australia and Chile. In Marginal Agricultural Land and Efficient Afforestation, ed. L. Bock and J. Rondeaux, 81-102. CEC Report EUR 10841. Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the European Communities.
68. Waterhouse, A., C. Morgan-Davies and I.A.R. Hulbert. 2002. The development of an integrated hill sheep and woodland system-relative contributions of sheep and woodland to farm and regional economics. The UK Agroforestry Forum Newsletter 2:5-8.
69. Williams, D., T. Lloyd and C. Watkins. 1994. Farmers and Foresters: Constraints on the Planting of New Farm Woodland. Nottingham, UK: Department of Geography, University of Nottingham.
70. Williams, P.A., A.M. Gordon, H.E. Garrett and L. Buck. 1997. Agroforestry in North America and its role in farming systems. In Temperate Agroforestry Systems, ed. A.M. Gordon and S.M. Newman, 9-84. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
71. Willis, K.G. and J.F. Benson. 1989. Recreational values of forests. Forestry 62:331-346.
72. Willis, R.W., T.H. Thomas and J. van Slycken. 1993. Poplar agroforestry: a re-evaluation of its economic potential on arable land in the United Kingdom. Forest Ecology and Management 57(3):85-97.
73. Zinkhan, F.C. 1996. Public land-use professionals’ perceptions of agroforestry applications in the South. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 17:32-38.
74. Zinkhan, F.C. and D.E. Mercer. 1997. An assessment of agroforestry systems in the southern USA. Agroforestry Systems 35:303-321.
75. Zinkhan, F.C., D.E. Mercer and B.H. Stansell. 1998. Assessing the market and non-market benefits of Southern agroforestry systems. In Proceedings of the Southern Forest Economics Workers Meeting, 19 March 1997, ed. R.A. Kluender, M.M. Corrigan and N.B. Smith, 45-47. Monticello, AR: The Arkansas Forest Resources Center, University of Arkansas.