Tolerance to water deficit in young trees of jackfruit and sugar apple;Tolerância ao déficit hídrico em plantas jovens de jaqueira e pinheira

Revista Ciencia Agronomica

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 245-252

  Rodrigues, Bruno Monteiro ^a   Souza, Bruna Dias ^a   Nogueira, Rejane Mansur ^b   Santos, Mauro Guida ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Annona squamosa; Artocarpus heterophyllus; Semi arid; Tropical fruit; Water relations

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955531396     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18066690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1806-66902010000200011     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ALBUQUERQUE, H. C. Situação atual e perspectivas para as anonáceas no Estado de Alagoas. In: SÃO JOSE, Abel Rebouças et al. Anonáceas, Produção e Mercado (Pinha, Graviola, Atemóia e Cherimólia). Vitória da Conquista: UESB/DFZ, 1997. p. 150-155.
2. BRADFORD, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, v. 72, n. 01, p. 248-254, 1976.
3. CAO, K. F.; GUO, Y. H.; CAI, Z. Q. Photosynthesis and antioxidant enzyme activity in breadfruit, jackfruit and mangosteen in southern Yunnan, China. Journal Horticulturae Science Biotechnology, v. 81, n. 01, p. 168-172, 2006.
4. CHAVES, M. M.; MAROCO, J. P.; PEREIRA, J. S. Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology, v. 30, n. 02, p. 239-264, 2003.
5. DAMATTA, F. M. Ecophysiology of tropical tree crops: an introduction. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, v. 19, n. 04, p. 239-244, 2007.
6. DUBOIS M. et al. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analysis Chemical, v. 29, n. 02, p. 350-356, 1956.
7. ENDRES, L. Daily and seasonal variation of water relationship in sugar apple (Annona squamosa L.) under different irrigation regimes at semi-arid Brazil. Scientia Horticulturae, v. 113, n. 02, p. 149-154, 2007.
8. HANSON, H. D.; HITZ, W. D. Metabolic responses of mesophytes to plant water deficits. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, v. 33, n. 01, p. 163-203, 1982.
9. HSIAO, T. C. Plant response to water stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, v. 24, n. 01, p. 519-570, 1973.
10. KRAMER, P. J.; BOYER, J. S. Water relations of plants and Soils. San Diego: Academic Press, 1995. 495 p.
11. LAWLOR, D. W. Limitation to photosynthesis in water-stressed leaves: stomata vs. metabolism and the role of ATP. Annals of Botany, v. 89, n. 07, p. 871-885, 2002.
12. LICHTENTHALER, H. K.; WELLBURN, A. R. Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochemical Society Transactions, v. 11, n. 03, p. 591-592, 1983.
13. MAXWELL, K.; JOHNSON, G. N. Chlorophyll fluorescence - a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany, v. 51, n. 345, p. 659-668, 2000.
14. MIRANDA, M. R. A. et al. Caracterização físico química e histológica do desenvolvimento de sapoti. Revista Ciência Agronômica, v. 39, n. 04, p. 575-582, 2008.
15. OKUMURA, H. H. et al. Fertilizantes minerais e orgânicos na formação de mudas enxertadas de gravioleira. Revista Ciência Agronômica, v. 39, n. 04, p. 590-596, 2008.
16. RIBEIRO, R. V. et al. High temperature effects on the response of photosynthesis to light in sweet Orange plants infected with Xylella fastidiosa. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, v. 15, n. 02, p. 89-97, 2003.
17. ROLLAND, F.; BAENA-GONZALES, E.; SHEEN, J. Sugar sensing and signaling in plants: conserved and novel mechanisms. Annual Review of Plant Biology, v. 57, n. 01, p. 675-709, 2006.
18. SANTOS, M. G. et al. The role of inorganic phosphate on photosynthesis recovery of common bean after a mild water deficit. Plant Science, v. 170, n. 03, p. 659-664, 2006.
19. SANTOS, M. G.; PIMENTEL, C. Daily balance of leaf sugars and amino acids as indicators of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) metabolic response and drought intensity. Physiology Molecular Biology of Plants, v. 15, n. 01, p. 23-30, 2009.
20. SCHULTZ, H. R. Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near-isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant and Cell Environment, v. 26, n. 08, p. 1393-1405, 2003.
21. SINCLAIR, T. R.; ZWIENIECKI, M. A.; HOLBROOK, N. M. Low leaf hydraulic conductance associated with drought tolerance in soybean. Physiologia Plantarum, v. 132, n. 03, p. 446-451, 2008.
22. SIRCELJ, H. et al. Detecting different levels of drought stress in apple trees (Malus domestica Borkh.) with selected biochemical and physiological parameters. Scientia Horticulturae, v. 113, n. 04, p. 362-369, 2007.
23. SIVACI, A. Seasonal changes of total carbohydrate contents in three varieties of apple (Malus sylvestris Miller) stem cuttings. Scientia Horticulturae, v. 109, n. 03, p. 234-327, 2006.
24. TARDIEU, F.; SIMONNEAU, T. Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Journal of Experimental Botany, v. 49, n. 320, p. 419-432, 1998.
25. VAN KOOTEN, O.; SNEL, J. F. H. The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomeclature in plant stress physiology. Photosynthesis Research, v. 25, n. 02, p. 147-150, 1990.
26. WINGLER, A. et al. The role of sugars in integrating environmental signals during the regulation of leaf senescence. Journal of Experimental Botany, v. 57, n. 02, p. 391-399, 2006.
27. YEMM, E. W.; COOCKING, E. C. The determination of amino acids with ninhydrin. Analyst, v. 80, n. 02, p. 209-213, 1955.