Sensitivity designs for preventing bias replication in randomized clinical trials

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 415-424

  Berger, Vance W ^a   Grant, William C ^b   Vazquez, Laura F ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SHEPHERD CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPIDEMIOLOGY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FOLLOW UP; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL;

HUMANS; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELECTION BIAS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77955521011     PISSN: 09622802     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0962280209359875     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Berger VW, Ivanova A., Knoll MD Minimizing predictability while retaining balance through the use of less restrictive randomization procedures. Statistics in Medicine 2003 ; 22 (19). 3017-3028.
2. Berger, VW The p-value interval as an inferential tool. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society D (The Statistician) 2001 ; 50 (1). 79-85.
3. Rosenbaum PR Replicating effects and biases. The American Statistician 2001 ; 55 (3). 223-227.
4. Hill AB The environment and disease: association or causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 1965 ; 58 (5). 295-300.
5. Rosenbaum PR Design sensitivity in observational studies. Biometrika 2004 ; 91 (1). 153-164.
6. Berger VW, Exner DV Detecting selection bias in randomized clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1999 ; 20 (4). 319-327.
7. Berger VW Selection bias and covariate imbalances in randomized clinical trials. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester ; 2005.
8. Berger VW The reverse propensity score to detect selection bias and correct for baseline imbalances. Statistics in Medicine 2005 ; 24: 2777-2787.
9. Dupin-Spriet T., Fermanian J., Spriet A. Quantification methods were developed for selection bias by predictability of allocations with unequal block randomization. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2005 ; 58: 1269e1 - e2.