Comprehensive evaluation for construction performance in concurrent engineering environment

International Journal of Project Management

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 708-718

  Shouke, Chen ^a   Zhuobin, Wei ^a   Jie, Li ^b  

^a NAVAL UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING   (China)

^b NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Comprehensive evaluation; Concurrent engineering; Construction performance; Evidential reasoning; Indexes system

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION; CONCURRENT DESIGN; CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE; DECISION MAKERS; EVALUATION INDEX; EVALUATION METHOD; EVIDENCE THEORIES; EVIDENTIAL REASONING; INCOMPLETE INFORMATION; INDEXES SYSTEM; NEGATIVE INFLUENCE; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; WORK PATTERNS;

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; FIGHTER AIRCRAFT;

CONCURRENT ENGINEERING;

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; MANUFACTURING; METHODOLOGY; REFORM PROCESS;

EID: 77955517187     PISSN: 02637863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Brookes N.J., Backhouse V.J. Understanding concurrent engineering implementation: a case study approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 1997, 36:3035-3054.
2. Chen, S.K., 2007. Research on the Application of Concurrent Engineering in Construction Project. Ph.D. Dissertation, Management Southeast University, Nanjing (in Chinese).
3. Chen S.K., Cheng H., Wei Z.B. Research on coordination mechanism in construction project organization. Eng. Sci. 2006, 4(3):100-110.
4. Chimay J.A., Anumba C., Baugh C. Organizational structure to support concurrent engineering in construction. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 2002, 102:260-270.
5. Dai Y.Q., Xu Z.H., Li Y., Da Q.L. New evaluation scale of linguistic information and it application. Chin. J. Manage. Sci. 2008, 16(2):145-149. (in Chinese).
6. Dang Y.G., Liu S.F., Liu B., Zhai Z.J. Study on the integrated clustering method under clustering coefficient with non-distinguished difference. Chin. J. Manage. Sci. 2005, 13(4):69-73. (in Chinese).
7. Deng J.L. General Methods of Grey System 2005, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, Wuhan, (in Chinese). second ed.
8. Evbuomwan N.O.F., Anumba C.J. An integrated framework for concurrent life-cycle design and construction. Adv. Eng. Soft. 2000, 9:7-9.
9. Farell M.J. The measurement of productive efficiency. J. Roy. Stat. Soc., A, Gen 1957, 120:253-281.
10. Fine C.H., Golany B., Naseraldin Modeling tradeoffs in three-dimensional concurrent engineering: a goal programming approach. J. Oper. Manage. 2005, 23:389-403.
11. George W.R.G., Terranova M. Collaborative decision weights in choice under uncertainty. Manage. Sci. 1999, 45:74-85.
12. Huang G.Q., Huang J., Mak K.L. Agent-based work flow management in collaborative product development on the internet. Comput.-Aided. Des. 2000, 32:133-144.
13. Jennings N.R., Sycara K., Wooldringe M. A roadmap of agent research and development. Auton. Agt. Multi.-Agt. Syst. 1998, 1:275-306.
14. Jiang L. Economic entropy and its application to the structure of the transport system-quality and quantity. Int. J. Methodol. 1996, 30:161-171.
15. Khafan, M.M.A., Anumba, C., 2000. A comparative review of concurrent engineering readiness assessment tools and models. In: Proceedings of Concurrent Engineering 2000 Conference, pp. 578-585.
16. Kittock J.E. Emergent conventions and the structure of multi-agent system. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System 1993, 371-383. Addison Wesley Press, New Mexico.
17. Koufteros X., Vonderembse M., Doll W. Concurrent engineering and its consequences. J. Oper. Manage. 2001, 19:91-115.
18. Kryszkiewicz M. Rough set approach to incomplete information system. Inform. Sci. 1998, 112:39-49.
19. Li Z.X., Wang P.X. Study on the model of performance evaluation to establish a fair incentive system. Chin. J. Manage. Sci. 2005, 13(3):126-130. (in Chinese).
20. Liu S.F., Lin Y. Grey Information: Theory and Practical Applications 2006, Spinger-Verlag, London.
21. Lu W., Xu W., Chen H.X. Validation method of simulation system. J. Shanghai Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2005, 11(4):86-88.
22. Nicholas J.M. Concurrent engineering overcoming obstacles to teamwork. Prod. Invent. Manage. J. 2001, 3:18-22.
23. Ostwald P.F., Jairo M. Manufacturing Processes and Systems 1997, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
24. Pawlak Z. Rough sets and intelligent date analysis. Inform. Sci. 2002, 147:1-12.
25. Pillai A.S., Joshi A., Rao K.S. Performance measurement of R&D projects in a multi-project, concurrent engineering environment. Int. J. Project Manage. 2002, 20:165-177.
26. Qiu W.L., Ye Y.C. The DEA model and application for evaluating in organization performance. Val. Eng. 2005, 132:86-88. (in Chinese).
27. Rosenblatt A., Waston G.F. Concurrent Engineering 1999, IEEE Spectrum.
28. Sarkar M. Rough-fuzzy functions in classification. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 2002, 132:353-369.
29. Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence 1976, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
30. Vincent G.D., Gavriel S. Concurrent engineering diagnostic model integrating people, organization and technology. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 1998, 11:461-474.
31. Wei D.K., Zhou X.Z. Huang B. Rough set model and precision reduction in incomplete and fuzzy decision information system. Comput. Sci. 2006, 33:182-185.
32. Winner, R.I., Pennell, J.P., Bertrand, H.E., Slusaczuk, M.M.G., 1988. The Role of CE in Weapons System. Institute for Defense Analysis Report, R-338, Washington, DC, USA.
33. XU Z.H. A new interactive method for multi-objective decision-making problems. Syst. Eng. Theor. Pract. 2002, (4):104-108. (in Chinese).
34. Xue X.L., Wang Y.W., Shen Q.P., Yu G.Y. Coordination mechanism for the construction supply chain management in the internet environment. Int. J. Project Manage. 2007, 25:150-157.
35. Zhang H.X., Shen Y.Z., Zhang Z.L. Local government performance evaluation model based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2006, 7:44-52. (in Chinese).