Advanced midwifery practice or advancing midwifery practice?

Women and Birth

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 117-120

  Smith, Rachel ^a   Leap, Nicky ^a   Homer, Caroline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Advanced practice; Midwifery

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; CANADA; DELIVERY; MIDWIFE; MIDWIFERY EDUCATION; NEW ZEALAND; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; REGISTRATION;

EID: 77955514465     PISSN: 18715192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2009.11.002     Document Type: Note

References (28)

1. Haxton J., Fahy K. Reducing length of stay for women presenting as outpatients to delivery suite: a clinical practice improvement project. Women & Birth 2009, 22(4).
2. Community Affairs Legislation Committee Health Legislation Amendment (Midwives and Nurse Practitioners) Bill 2009 and two related Bills [Provisions] 2009, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
3. House of Representatives Votes and Proceedings Hansard 2009.
4. Australian Government Budget 2009-2010. Part 2. Expense measures 2009, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
5. ICM International definition of a midwife 2005, International Confederation of Midwives, The Hague, The Netherlands.
6. Sookhoo M., Butler M. An analysis of the concept of advanced midwifery practice. British Journal of Midwifery 1999, 7(11):690-693.
7. Lewis P. Editorial: A framework for advancing practice. British Journal of Midwifery 2003, 11(5):260-261.
8. Leap N. Rhetoric and reality: narrowing the gap in Australian midwifery (Doctor of Midwifery thesis), Sydney: Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, University of Technology Sydney; 2005.
9. State Government of Victoria Health workforce competency principles: a Victorian discussion paper 2009, Victorian Government's Department of Human Services, Melbourne.
10. Benner P. From novice to expert: excellence and power in clinical nursing practice 1984, Addison Wesley, California.
11. Eraut M. Concepts of competence. Journal of Interprofessional Care 1998, 12(2):127-139.
12. Hunter B. Conflicting ideologies as a source of emotion work in midwifery in midwifery: best practice 2009, vol. 5. Butterworth, Heinmann, Elsevier, Edinburgh.
13. Warwick C. Editorial: higher level practice-have you a view?. British Journal of Midwifery 2003, 11(3):132-133.
14. ACM. Midwifery and the Nurse Practitioner. Volume, DOI: ; 2005. http://www.midwives.org.au/AboutUs/ACMPositionStatements/MidwiferyandtheNursePractitioner/tabid/263/Default.aspx.
15. Canadian Midwifery Regulators Consortium Canadian competencies for midwives 2008, Canadian Midwifery Regulators Consortium, Winnapeg.
16. ANMC National Competency Standards for the Nurse Practitioner 2006, Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council, Canberra.
17. Brodie P., Barclay L. Contemporary issues in Australian midwifery regulation. Australian Health Review 2001, 24(4):103-118.
18. Brodie P. Addressing the barriers to midwifery-Australian midwives speaking out. Australian Journal of Midwifery 2002, 15(2):5-14.
19. Barclay L., et al. The AMAP report. Volume I and II 2003, Centre for Family Health and Midwifery, UTS, Sydney.
20. Gamble J., Vernon B. Midwifery in Australia: emerging from the shadows, in Midwifery freedom to practise? An international exploration of midwifery practice 2007, 30-50. Churchill Livingston, Elsevier, Edinburgh. L. Reid (Ed.).
21. Commonwealth of Australia Improving Maternity Services in Australia: A Discussion Paper from the Australian Government 2008, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
22. Commonwealth of Australia Improving Maternity Services in Australia: Report of the Maternity Services Review 2009, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
23. ANMC. Accreditation of nursing & midwifery courses-a national project undertaken by the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Council. 2009 [cited 10 September 2009]; Available from: http://www.anmc.org.au/current_projects.
24. Hatem M., et al. Midwife-led versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2008, [Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004667]. 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub2.
25. Sandall J. Choice, continuity and control: changing midwifery, towards a sociological perspective. Midwifery 1995, 11(4):201-209.
26. Todd C., Farquhar M., Camilleri-Ferrante C. Team midwifery: the views and job satisfaction of midwives. Midwifery 1998, 14(4):214-224.
27. Stevens T., McCourt C. One-to-one midwifery practice. Part 4. Sustaining the model. British Journal of Midwifery 2002, 10(3):174-179.
28. Foureur M., Brodie P., Homer C. Midwife-centered versus woman-centered care: a developmental phase?. Women & Birth 2009, 22(2):47-49.