Environmental legislation and contamination: The gap between theory and reality in South Africa

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 91, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2275-2280

  Papu Zamxaka, Vathiswa ^a   Harpham, Trudy ^b,c   Mathee, Angela ^a,d,e  

^a SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (South Africa)

^b LONDON SOUTH BANK UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^e UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Contamination; Environment; Legislation; Mercury

Indexed keywords

HEALTH RISKS; MERCURY (METAL);

ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL WASTES; HUMAN POSE; MERCURY; MERCURY CONTAMINATION; RECENT RESEARCHES; SOUTH AFRICA; WASTE LEGISLATION;

CONTAMINATION;

MERCURY;

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; CONTAMINATED LAND; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; HEALTH RISK; MERCURY (ELEMENT); NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; RURAL AREA; SOIL POLLUTION; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ARTICLE; CONTAMINATION; LAW; MASS MEDIUM; NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION; POLLUTION; RURAL AREA; SOUTH AFRICA; WASTE;

SOUTH AFRICA;

EID: 77955510775     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.014     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. AMAP Assessment Report: Arctic Pollution Issues 1998, Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo.
2. Barratt G.J., Combrink J. An assessment of the degree of mercury bio-transformation in two river systems following discharges from a mercury recovery plant. Water Institute of South Africa 2002, (Water SA Special Edition: WISA Proceedings).
3. Birkett J.W., Noreng J.M.K., Lester J.N. Spatial distribution of mercury in the sediments and riparian environment of the river Yare, Norfolk, UK. Environmental Pollution 2002, 116(1):65-74.
4. Carnie T. Disposal plans for toxic Thor waste. The Mercury 2009, 30 September 2009.
5. Clapp J. Toxic Exports, the Transfer of Hazardous Wastes from Rich to Poor Countries 2001, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.
6. Clarke L. Comment: Thor Chemicals under scrutiny. Daily News 1994, 23 March 1994.
7. De Marchi B., Funtowicz S., Ravetz J. Seveso: a paradoxical classic disaster. The Long Road to Recovery: Community Responses to Industrial Disasters 1996, 86-120. United Nations University Press, New York. J.K. Mitchell (Ed.).
8. Ei-Fadel M., Zeinati M., Ei-Jisr K., Jamali D. Industrial-waste management in developing countries: the case of Lebanon. Journal of Environmental Management 2001, 61:281-300.
9. Euripidou R., Peek B. Still nothing happening at Thor, the fate of the contaminated Thor Chemicals is still not decided. Groundwork 2007, 9(3):4-9.
10. Fabbri D., Feisatti M., Lombardo M., Trombini C., Vassura I. The lagoon of Ravenna (Italy): characterisation of mercury-contaminated sediments. Science of the Total Environment 1998, 213(1-3):121-128.
11. Groundwork Advising and monitoring the clean up and disposal of mercury waste in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa [Online] Available from:, (accessed 22.06.07). http://www.zeromercury.org/projects/Proposal_EEB_Thor_Chemicals_Final_revised_new_WebVs.pdf.
12. Harada M. Minamata disease: methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 1995, 25(1):1-24.
13. Hylander L.D., Goodsite M.E. Environmental costs of mercury pollution. Science of the Total Environment 2006, 368:352-370.
14. Johnston P., Stringer R., French M.C., Vallette J. Contamination of soils in the vicinity of a mercury processing plant. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicity 1991, 46(1):74-78.
15. Kehrig H., Malm O., Akagi H., Guimarães J.R.D., Torres J.P.M. Methylmercury in fish and hair samples from the Balbina Reservoir, Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research 1998, 77:84-90.
16. Maruyama S. Responses to Minamata disease. The Long Road to Recovery: Community Responses to Industrial Disasters 1996, 41-59. United Nations University Press, New York. J.K. Mitchell (Ed.).
17. Maxson P. Mercury flows and safe storage of surplus mercury, Report to the Environment Directorate, European Commission, August 2006 [Online] Available from:, (accessed 28.04.10). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/mercury/pdf/hg_flows_safe_storage.pdf.
18. Memela M. Poisoned water scare for millions in Durban. Sowetan 2008, 15 October 2008.
19. Nuttall K.L. Interpreting hair mercury levels in individual patients. Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science 2006, 36(3):248-261.
20. Ontario Ministry of the Environment Ontario's sediment quality guidelines as provided in Guidelines for identifying, assessing and managing contaminated sediments in Ontario: An integrated approach (OMOE, 2008) [Online] Available from:, (accessed 03.07.08). http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/publications/forms/index.php%23resources.
21. Oosthuizen J., Ehrlich R. The impact of pollution from a mercury processing plant in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, on the health of fish-eating communities in the area: an environmental health risk assessment. International Journal of Environmental Health Research 2001, 11:41-50.
22. Papu-Zamxaka, V., 2009. Industrial mercury contamination and human health in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: exposure and awareness. Ph.D. Thesis, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom.
23. Papu-Zamxaka V., Mathee A., Harpham T., Barnes B., Röllin H., Lyons M., Jordaan W., Cloete M. Elevated mercury exposure in communities living alongside the Inanda Dam, South Africa. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 2010, 12:472-477.
24. Puckett J. Disposing of the waste trade: closing the recycling loophole. The Ecologist 1994, 24:53-58.
25. Reid P. A model for a multi-agency response management system (MARMS) for South Africa. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Management 2008, 17(2):244-255.
26. Shelton L.R., Capel P.D. Guidelines for Collecting and Processing Samples of Stream Bed Sediments for Analysis of Trace Elements and Organic Contaminants for the National Water-Quality Assessment Programme 1994, U S Geological Survey Open-File Report 94-458, Sacramento, California.
27. Shi J., Liang L., Jiang G., Jin X. The speciation and bioavailability of mercury in sediments of Haihe River, China. Environment International 2005, 31:357-365.
28. Shrivastava P. Long-term recovery from the Bhopal crisis. The Long Road to Recovery: Community Responses to Industrial Disasters 1996, 121-147. United Nations University Press, New York. J.K. Mitchell (Ed.).
29. South Africa National Environmental Management Act 1998 (c.107). Pretoria: Office of the President [Online] Available from:, (accessed 01.11.09). http://www.info.gov.za/view/DownloadFileAction%3Fid%3D70641.
30. South Africa National Environmental Management: Waste Act 2008 (c.59). Pretoria: office of the President [Online] Available from:, (accessed 01.11.09). http://www.info.gov.za/view/DownloadFileAction%3Fid%3D97351.
31. Spiegel S.J. Socioeconomic dimensions of mercury pollution abatement: engaging artisanal mining communities in Sub-Saharan Africa. Ecological Economics 2009, 68:3072-3083.
32. US EPA, 1997 Office of air quality planning and standards office of research and development. Mercury Study Report to Congress, Fate and transport of mercury in the environment Vol. III: 205-402. EPA-452/R-97-005.
33. US EPA Mercury Update: Impact on Fish Advisories 1999, [Online] Available from:, (accessed 12.10.09). http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/fish/advice/mercupd.pdf.
34. Van Gemert W.J.Th., Quakernaat J., Van Veen H.J. Methods for the treatment of contaminated dredged sediments. Environmental Management of Solid Wastes: Dredged Material and Mine Tailings 1988, 44-64. Springer-Verlag, New York. W. Salomons, U. Forstner (Eds.).
35. Ward H. Corporate accountability in search of a treaty? Some insights from foreign direct liability 2002, [Online] Available from:, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Sustainable Development Programme, (accessed 20 01 07). http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/publications/papers/view/-/id/56/.
36. WHO Environmental Health Criteria 101: Methylmercury 1990, IPCS Publication, WHO, Geneva.