European trade in forest products and fuels

Journal of Forest Economics

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 235-251

  Lundmark, Robert ^a  

^a LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bioenergy; Biomass; Energy; Forestry; Heckscher Ohlin; Revealed comparative advantage

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; INTERNATIONAL TRADE;

BIO-ENERGY; COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE; DEPENDENT VARIABLES; DOMESTIC DEMAND; ENERGY; EUROPEAN COUNTRIES; HECKSCHER-OHLIN; MODEL SPECIFICATIONS;

FORESTRY;

BIOENERGY; BIOMASS; COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE; EUROPEAN UNION; FOREST PRODUCT; MODELING; REGIONAL TRADE;

BIOMASS; ENERGY; FOREIGN TRADE; FOREST PRODUCTS; FORESTRY; FUELS; LOGS; WOOD;

EUROPE;

EID: 77955510390     PISSN: 11046899     EISSN: 16181530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2009.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Balassa B. Trade liberalisation and 'revealed' comparative advantage. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 1965, 33(1):99-123.
2. Balassa B. Comparative advantage in manufactured goods: a reappraisal. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1986, 68:259-266.
3. Balassa B. Comparative Advantage, Trade Policy and Economic Development 1989, New York University Press, New York.
4. Baldwin R. Determinants of trade and foreign investment: further evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1979, 61:40-48.
5. Ballance R., Forstner H., Murray T. On measuring comparative advantage: a note on Bowen's indices. Weltwirtschuftliches Archiv 1985, 121:346-350.
6. Ballance R., Forstner H., Murray T. Consistency tests of alternative measures of comparative advantage. Review of Economics and Statistics 1987, 69(1):157-161.
7. Bojnec S. Trade and revealed comparative advantage measures. Eastern European Economics 2001, 39(1):72-98.
8. Bonnefoi B., Buongiorno J. Comparative advantage of countries in forest-products trade. Forest Ecology and Management 1990, 36:1-17.
9. Bowen H. On the theoretical interpretation of indices of trade intensity and revealed comparative advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 1983, 199(3):464-472.
10. Bowen H. On measuring comparative advantage: further comments. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 1986, 122(3):379-381.
11. Bowen H., Learner E., Sveikauskas L. Multicountry, multifactor tests of the factor abundance theory. American Economic Review 1987, 77:791-809.
12. Brecher R., Choudhri E. The factor content of consumption in Canada and the United States: a two-country test of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Model. Empirical Methods for International Trade 1988, MIT Press, Massachussets. R. Feenstra (Ed.).
13. Eiteljörge U., Hartmann M. Central and Eastern European food chains competitiveness. The European Agro-Food System and the Challenge of Global Competition 1999, ISMEA, Italy. T. Favoretto (Ed.).
14. Estevadeordal A., Taylor M. A century of missing trade?. American Economic Review 2002, 92(1):383-393.
15. Eurostat, 2008. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu.
16. FAO - Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations. (2008). FAOSTAT, http://www.fao.org.
17. Frohberg K., Hartmann M. Baltic agricultural competitiveness and prospects under EU accession. Agriculture and East-West European Integration 1999, Ashgate publishing, UK. J. Hartell, J. Swinnen (Eds.).
18. Harkness J. Factor abundance and comparative advantage. American Economic Review 1978, 68:784-800.
19. Heckscher, E. (1919). The effects of foreign trade on the distribution of income. Ekonomisk Tidskriff, 21:l-32.
20. Hinsch, C., 2003. Going forward. New Energy, 36-38.
21. Kohler W. How robust are sign and rank order tests of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Theorem?. Oxford Economic Papers 1991, 43:158-171.
22. Leamer E. Sources of International Comparative Advantage 1984, MIT Press, Massachusetts.
23. Liesner H. The European Common Market and British Industry. Economic Journal 1958, 68:302-316.
24. Mansikkasalo, A. (2007).The European forest trade model: EU policy and the impact on forest raw material use. Licentiate thesis 2007:11, Luleå university of technology, Sweden.
25. Maskus K. A test of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Theorem: the Leontief Commonplace. Journal of International Economics 1985, 19:201-212.
26. Noussair C., Plott C., Riezman R. An experimental investigation of the patterns of international trade. American Economic Review 1995, 85:462-491.
27. Ohlin B. Interregional and International Trade 1933, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts.
28. Peterson J. Export shares and revealed comparative advantage. A study of international trade. Applied Economics 1988, 20:351-365.
29. Porter M. The Competitive Advantage of Nations 1990, The Free Press, New York.
30. Prestemon J., Buongiorno J. Comparative advantage in US interstate forest products trade. Journal of forest economics 1997, 3(3):207-228.
31. Staiger R. A specification test of the Heckscher-Ohlin Theory. Journal of International Economics 1988, 25:129-141.
32. Tamor K. An empirical examination of the factor endowments hypothesis. Canadian Journal of Economics 1987, 2:387-398.
33. Trefler D. The case of missing trade and other mysteries. American Economic Review 1995, 85:1029-1046.
34. Trefler D. International factor price differences: Leontief was right!. Journal of Political Economy 1993, 101(6):961-987.
35. UNIDO - United Nations Industrial Development Organization Industry in a Changing World 1983, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna.
36. Uusivuori J., Tervo M. Comperative advantage and forest endowment in forest products trade: evidence from panel data of OECD-countries. Journal of Forest Economics 2002, 8:53-75.
37. Vanek J. The Natural Resources Content of United States Foreign Trade, 1870-1955 1963, MIT Press, Massachusetts.
38. Vanek J. The factor proportions theory: the N-factor case. Kyklos 1968, 21(4):749-756.
39. Vollrath T. A Theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 1991, 127(2):263-280.
40. Webster A. Some issues in the measurement of comparative advantage. Applied Economics 1991, 23:937-948.
41. Yeats A. On the appropriate interpretation of the revealed comparative advantage index: implications of a methodology based on industry sector analysis. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 1985, 121(1):61-73.