Estimation of the measurement uncertainty by the bottom-up approach for the determination of methamphetamine and amphetamine in urine

Journal of Analytical Toxicology

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 222-228

  Lee, Sooyeun ^a   Choi, Hyeyoung ^a   Kim, Eunmi ^a   Choi, Hwakyung ^a   Chung, Heesun ^a   Chung, Kyu Hyuck ^b  

^a National Institute of Scientific Investigation   (South Korea)

^b Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE; METHAMPHETAMINE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFECT SIZE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY; TOXICITY TESTING; UNCERTAINTY; URINALYSIS; URINE LEVEL; VALIDATION PROCESS; ALGORITHM; CALIBRATION; HUMAN; MASS FRAGMENTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS; URINE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ALGORITHMS; AMPHETAMINE; CALIBRATION; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY; HUMANS; METHAMPHETAMINE; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; UNCERTAINTY; VALIDATION STUDIES AS TOPIC;

EID: 77955497710     PISSN: 01464760     EISSN: 01464760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jat/34.4.222     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. V.R. Meyer. Measurement uncertainty. J. Chromatogr. A 1158(1- 2): 15-24 (2007).
2. G.N. Leung, E.N. Ho, W.H. Kwok, D.K. Leung, F.P. Tang, T.S. Wan, A.S. Wong, C.H. Wong, J.K. Wong, and N.H. Yu. A bottom-up approach in estimating the measurement uncertainty and other important considerations for quantitative analyses in drug testing for horses. J. Chromatogr. A 1163(1-2): 237-246 (2007).
3. E. Spirito and F. Botre. The role of measurement uncertainty in doping analysis. Int. J. Risk Assess. Manage. 5: 374-386 (2005).
4. World drug report 2008, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). http://www.undispatch.com/archives/2008/06/world_drug_repo.php (accessed May 2009).
5. R.C. Baselt. Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man, 5th ed. Chemical Toxicology Institute, Foster City, CA, 2000, p 527.
6. E. Kim, J. Lee, H. Choi, E. Han, Y. Park, H. Choi, and H. Chung. Comparison of methamphetamine concentrations in oral fluid, urine and hair of twelve drug abusers using solid-phase extraction and GC-MS. Ann. Toxicol. Anal., in press.
7. Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, EURACHEM/CITAC Guide, 2nd ed., 2000.
8. International Organization for Standardization. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, 1995.
9. S. Lee, Y. Park, W. Yang, E. Han, S. Choe, M. Lim, and H. Chung. Estimation of the measurement uncertainty of methamphetamine and amphetamine in hair analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. 185(1-3): 59- 66 (2009).
10. G. Bagura, M. Sánchez-Viñasa, D. Gázqueza, M. Ortegab, and R. Romeroa. Estimation of the uncertainty associated with the standard addition methodology when a matrix effect is detected. Talanta 66: 1168-1174 (2005).
11. R. Gullberg. Estimating the measurement uncertainty in forensic breath-alcohol analysis. Accred. Qual. Assur. 11: 562-568 (2006).
12. M. Patriarca, M. Castelli, F. Corsetti, and A. Menditto. Estimate of uncertainty of measurement from a single-laboratory validation study: application to the determination of lead in blood. Clin. Chem. 50: 1396-1405 (2004).
13. J. Kristl, B. Krajnčič, D. Brodnjak-Vončina, and M. Veber. Evaluation of measurement uncertainty in the determination of jasmonic acid in Lemna minor L. by liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Accred. Qual. Assur. 12: 303-310 (2007).
14. Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of measurement results, Korean Agency for Technology and Standards notification No. 2007-134 (April 9 2007).
15. F.T. Peters and H.H. Maurer. Bioanalytical method validation and its implications for forensic and clinical toxicology-a review. Accred. Qual. Assur. 7: 441-449 (2002).