Validation of DynaCT in the morphological assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm for endovascular repair

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 183-189

  Nordon, Ian M ^a   Hinchliffe, Robert J ^a   Malkawi, Amir H ^a   Taylor, Jeremy ^a   Holt, Peter J ^a   Morgan, Robert ^a   Loftus, Ian M ^a   Thompson, Matt M ^a  

^a ST GEORGE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D rotational angiography; Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Computed tomography; DynaCT; Endovascular aneurysm repair; Ruptured aneurysm

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AGED; AORTA GRAFT; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTERY THROMBOSIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KAPPA STATISTICS; MALE; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PHYSICIAN; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE; STENT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ANGIOPLASTY; AORTOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSEL TRANSPLANTATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT MONITORING; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; COHORT STUDIES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77955489511     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: 15451550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/09-2955.1     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Parker MV, O'Donnell SD, Chang AS, et al. What imaging studies are necessary for abdominal aortic endograft sizing? A prospective blinded study using conventional computed tomography, aortography, and three-dimensional computed tomography. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41:199-205.
2. Heran NS, Song JK, Namba K, et al. The utility of DynaCT in neuroendovascular procedures. Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:330-332.
3. Biasi L, Ali T, Ratnam L, et al. DynaCT improves quality control during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2009;29:288-295.
4. Eide KR, Odegard A, Myhre HO, et al. DynaCT during EVAR - A comparison with multidetector CT. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:23-30.
5. Sadat U, Boyle JR, Walsh SR, et al. Endovascular vs. open repair of acute abdominal aortic aneurysms-a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:227-236.
6. Rose DFG, Davidson IR, Hinchliffe RJ, et al. Anatomical suitability of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms for endovascular repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2003;10:453-457. (Pubitemid 37129204)
7. Reichart M, Geelkerken RH, Huisman AB, et al. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: endovascular repair is feasible in 40% of patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;26:479-486. (Pubitemid 37362088)
8. Mayer D, Pfammatter T, Rancic Z, et al. 10 years of emergency endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortoiliac aneurysms: lessons learned. Ann Surg. 2009;249:510-515.
9. Ahn SS, Rutherford RB, Johnston KW, et al. Reporting standards for infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 1997;25:405-410. (Pubitemid 27102665)
10. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135-160. (Pubitemid 29425900)
12. Singh K, Jacobsen BK, Solberg S, et al. Intra- and interobserver variability in the measurements of abdominal aortic and common iliac artery diameter with computed tomography. The Tromso study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;25:399-407. (Pubitemid 36592458)