Evaluation of optical rhinometry for nasal provocation testing in allergic and nonallergic subjects

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 143, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 284-289

  Luong, Amber ^a   Cheung, Esther J ^a   Citardi, Martin J ^a   Batra, Pete S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTAMINE; OXYMETAZOLINE; ALLERGEN; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ALLERGIC RHINITIS; ARTICLE; BLOOD VOLUME; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; NOSE CAVITY; NOSE CONGESTION; NOSE PROVOCATION TEST; OPTICAL RHINOMETRY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RHINOMETRY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HAY FEVER; INTRANASAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PERENNIAL RHINITIS; RHINOMANOMETRY;

ADMINISTRATION, INTRANASAL; ADULT; ALLERGENS; FEMALE; HISTAMINE; HUMANS; OXYMETAZOLINE; RHINITIS, ALLERGIC, PERENNIAL; RHINITIS, ALLERGIC, SEASONAL; RHINOMANOMETRY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 77955484692     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.03.030     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. L. Malm, R. Gerth van Wijk, and C. Bachert Guidelines for nasal provocations with aspects on nasal patency, airflow, and airflow resistance International Committee on Objective Assessment of the Nasal Airways, International Rhinologic Society Rhinology 38 2000 1 6
2. P.J. Gergen, and P.C. Turkeltaub The association of individual allergen reactivity with respiratory disease in a national sample: data from the second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1976-80 (NHANES II) J Allergy Clin Immunol 90 1992 579 588
3. J.H. Krouse, K. Sadrazodi, and K. Kerswill Sensitivity and specificity of prick and intradermal testing in predicting response to nasal provocation with timothy grass antigen Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131 2004 215 219
4. J.H. Krouse, A.G. Shah, and K. Kerswill Skin testing in predicting response to nasal provocation with alternaria Laryngoscope 114 2004 1389 1393
5. U. Hampel, E. Schleicher, and E.G. Wustenberg et al. Optical measurement of nasal swellings IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51 2004 1673 1679
6. E.G. Wustenberg, T. Zahnert, and K.B. Huttenbrink et al. Comparison of optical rhinometry and active anterior rhinomanometry using nasal provocation testing Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133 2007 344 349
7. J.N. Baraniuk, and D. Kim Nasonasal reflexes, the nasal cycle, and sneeze Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 7 2007 105 111
8. R.F. Andre, H.D. Vuyk, and A. Ahmed et al. Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway A systematic review of the highest level of evidence Clin Otolaryngol 34 2009 518 525
9. M. Simola, and H. Malmberg Sensation of nasal airflow compared with nasal airway resistance in patients with rhinitis Clin Otolaryngol 22 1997 260 262
10. N. Iriyoshi, K. Takeuchi, and A. Yuta et al. Increased expression of histamine H1 receptor mRNA in allergic rhinitis Clin Exp Allergy 26 1996 379 385