A predictive model for well loss using fuzzy logic approach

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 24, Issue 17, 2010, Pages 2400-2404

  Altunkaynak, Abdüsselam ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Drawdown; Fuzzy; Groundwater; Prediction; Well loss

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER TEST ANALYSIS; DRAWDOWN; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FUZZY; FUZZY LOGIC APPROACH; FUZZY MODELS; GROUNDWATER SOURCES; INITIAL ESTIMATE; MEAN ABSOLUTE ERROR; OBSERVED DATA; PREDICTIVE MODELS; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; REALISTIC LIMITATION; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERRORS; SIMPLE METHOD; WELL DESIGN;

AQUIFERS; BLOCK CODES; FORECASTING; FUZZY SYSTEMS; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; LAMINAR FLOW; MEAN SQUARE ERROR;

FUZZY LOGIC;

AQUIFER; DRAWDOWN; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; GROUNDWATER; LAMINAR FLOW; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; TURBULENT FLOW;

EID: 77955476970     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7642     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Altunkaynak A. 2009. Sediment load prediction by genetic algorithms. Advances in Engineering Software 40(9): 928-934.
2. Altunkaynak A, Sen Z. 2007. Fuzzy logic model of lake water level fluctuations in Lake Van, Turkey. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 90(3-4): 227-233.
3. Altunkaynak A, Özger M, Çakmakç1 M. 2005. Water consumption prediction of Istanbul city by using fuzzy logic approach. Water Resources Management 19: 641-654.
4. Avci CB. 1992. Parameter estimation for step-drawdown tests. Ground Water 30(3): 338-342.
5. Bardossy A, Duckstein L. 1995. Fuzzy-Rule Based Modeling with Application to Geophysical, Biological and Engineering Systems. CRC Press: Boca Raton, Florida.
6. Batu V. 1998. Aquifer Hydraulics a Comprehensive Guide to Hydrogeologic Data Analysis. John Wiley&Sons, Inc.: New York; 600-623.
7. Firat M, Gungor M. 2008. Hydrological time series modeling using neuro-fuzzy inference system. Hydrological Processes 22: 2122-2132.
8. Hantush MS. 1964. Advances in Hydroscience. Chapter: Hydraulics of Wells. Academic Press: New York; 281-442.
9. Jacob CE. 1946. Radial flow in a leaky artisian aquifer. Transactions, American Geophysical Union 27: 198-205.
10. Jacob CE. 1947. Drawdown test to determine effective radius of artisian wells. Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers 112: 1047-1070.
11. Jacob CE. 1950. Flow of groundwater. In Engineering Hydraulics, Rouse H. (ed.). John Wiley: New York; 321-386.
12. Mamdani EH. 1974. Application of fuzzy algorithms for control of simple dynamic plant. Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers-London 121(12): 1585-1588.
13. Ö zger M. 2009. Comparison of fuzzy inference systems for streamflow prediction. Hydrological Sciences Journal 54(2): 261-273.
14. Rorabaugh MI. 1953. Graphical and theoretical analysis of stepdrawdown test of artesian wells. Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers 79(separate 362): 1-23.
15. Sen Z. 1995. Applied Hydrogeolgy for Scientists and Engineers. CRC Lewis Publishers: Baco Racon, New York; 355-386.
16. Sen Z, Altunkaynak A, Özger M. 2003. Autorun persistence of hydrologic design. Journal of Hydraulogic Engineering 130(8): 816-826.
17. Sen Z, Altunkaynak A. 2006. A comparative fuzzy logic approach to runoff coefficient and runoff estimation. Hydrological Processes 20(9): 1993-2009.
18. Sen Z, Altunkaynak A. 2009. System modeling of drinking water consumption prediction. Expert Systems with Applications 36(9): 11745-11752.
19. Takagi T, Sugeno M. 1985. Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 15: 116-132.
20. Uyumaz A, Altunkaynak A, Ozger M. 2006. Fuzzy logic model for equilibrium scour downstream of a dam's vertical gate. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering-ASCE 132(10): 1069-1075.