Antecedent soil moisture conditions of different soil types in South-western Ontario, Canada

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 24, Issue 17, 2010, Pages 2417-2424

  Nishat, S ^a   Guo, Y ^a   Baetz, B W ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Continuous simulation; Design storm approach; Empirical equations; Frequency distributions

Indexed keywords

ANTECEDENT SOIL MOISTURE; CLIMATE CONDITION; CONTINUOUS SIMULATION; DESIGN STORMS; EMPIRICAL EQUATIONS; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS; INPUT DESIGN; LIMITED INFORMATION; ONTARIO , CANADA; PLANNING AND DESIGN; SOIL CHARACTERISTICS; SOIL PARTICLES; SOIL TYPES; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; URBAN STORMWATER;

CLIMATE MODELS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESIGN; GEOLOGIC MODELS; MOISTURE CONTROL; MOISTURE DETERMINATION; SOIL MOISTURE; STORMS;

SOIL SURVEYS;

ANTECEDENT CONDITIONS; CLIMATE CONDITIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; SOIL MOISTURE; SOIL TYPE;

CANADA; ONTARIO [CANADA];

EID: 77955476766     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7647     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adams BJ, Papa F. 2000. Urban Stormwater Management Planning with Analytical Probabilistic Models. John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New York.
2. Ahmed M, Dietrich K, Durrans RS. 2003. Stormwater Conveyance Modeling and Design. Haested Press: Waterbury, CT, USA.
3. Beaudoin P, Rouselle J, Marchi G. 1983. Reliability of the design storm concept in evaluating runoff peak flow. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 19(3): 483-487.
4. Brocca L, Melone F, Moramacro T. 2008. On the estimation of antecedent wetness conditions in rainfall-runoff modelling. Hydrological Processes 22(5): 629-642. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6629.
5. Castillo VM, Gomez-Plaza A, Martinez-Mena M. 2003. The role of antecedent soil moisture content in the runoff response of semiarid catchments: a simulation approach. Journal of Hydrology 284: 114-130. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00264-6.
6. City of Toronto. 2003. Wet Weather Flow Management Guidelines. Policy and Program Development. Water Infrastructure Management. Toronto Water. Last Accessed 10/11/2008. (http://www.toronto.ca/water/protecting quality/wwfmmpguidelines/pdf/wwwmmppolicy.pdf).
7. Clapp RB, Hornberger GM. 1978. Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties. Water Resources Research 14(4): 601-604.
8. De Michele C, Salvadori G. 2002. On the derived flood frequency: analytical formulation and the influence of antecedent soil moisture condition. Journal of Hydrology 262: 245-258.
9. Descroix L, Nouvelot J-F, Vauclin M. 2002. Evaluation of an antecedent precipitation index to model runoff yield in the Western Sierra Madre (North-West Mexico). Journal of Hydrology 263: 114-130.
10. D'Odorico PD, Ridolfi L, Porporato A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2000. Preferential states of seasonal soil moisture: the impact of climate fluctuations. Water Resources Research 36(8): 2209-2219.
11. Ginting D, Mamo M. 2006. Measuring runoff-suspended solids using an improved turbidometer method. Journal of Environmental Quality 35: 815-823.
12. Guo Y, Zhuge Z. 2008. Analytical probabilistic flood routing for urban stormwater management purposes. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 35: 487-499. DOI: 10.1139/L07-131.
13. Hawkins RH. 1993. Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 119(2): 334-345.
14. Hoffman DW, Richards NR. 1953. Soil Survey of Peel County: Report No. 18 of the Ontario Soil Survey. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food: Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
15. Jones CA, Kiniry JR. 1986. CERES-Maize: A Simulation Model of Maize Growth and Development. Texas A&M University Press: USA.
16. Kannan N, Santhi C, Williams JR, Arnold JG. 2008. Development of a continuous soil moisture accounting procedure for curve number methodology and its behaviour with different evapotranspiration methods. Hydrological Processes 22: 2114-2121. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6811.
17. Knisel WG, Davis FM. 1999. GLEAMS: Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems. Version 3D0 User Manual. Publication No. SEWRL-WGK/FMD-050199.
18. Laio F, Porporato A, Ridolfi L, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2001. Plants in watercontrolled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and response to water stress II. Probabilistic soil moisture dynamics. Advances in Water Resources 24: 707-723.
19. Lamont SJ, Eli RN, Fletcher JJ. 2008. Continuous hydrologic models and curve numbers: a path forward. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 13(7): 621-635.
20. Levy B, McCuen R. 1999. Assessment of storm duration for hydrologic design. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 4(3): 209-213.
21. Marselak J. 1978. Research on the design storm concept. ASCE Urban Water Resources Research Program. Technical Memorandum No. 33.
22. Martel L, Parkin G. 1998. Summary of activities: lysimeters at GTIERC. Summer 1998. Department of Land Resource Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
23. rd edn. Prentice Hall Inc: New Jersey, USA.
24. Mishra SK, Jain MK, Pandey RP, Singh VP. 2005. Catchment areabased evaluation of the AMC-dependent SCS-CN-based rainfallrunoff models. Hydrological Processes 19: 2701-2718. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5736.
25. Nishat S, Guo Y, Baetz BW. 2007. Development of a simplified continuous simulation model for investigating long-term soil moisture fluctuations. Agricultural Water Management 92: 53-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.04.012.
26. Nishat S, Guo Y, Baetz BW. 2008. Climate change and urban grass land soil moisture conditions in South-Western Ontario, Canada. Journal of Environmental Informatics 12(2): 105-119. DOI: 10.3808/jei200800129.
27. Nnadi FN, Kline FX, Wray HL, Wanielista MP. 1999. Comparison of design storm concepts using continuous simulation with short duration storms. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 31(1): 61-85.
28. Packman JC, Kidd CHR. 1980. A logical approach to the design storm concept. Water Resources Research 16(6): 994-1000.
29. Ponce VM, Hawkins RH. 1996. Runoff curve number: has it reached maturity. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 1(1): 11-19.
30. Quader A. 2007. Analytical estimation of the effective discharge of small urban streams. PhD thesis. McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
31. Roy JW, Parkin GW, Wagner-Riddle C. 2000. Water flow in unsaturated soil below turfgrass: observations and LEACHM (within EXPRESS) predictions. Soil Scence Society of America Journal 64: 86-93.
32. Roy JW, Hall JC, Parkin GW, Wagner-Riddle C, Clegg BS. 2001. Seasonal leaching and biodegradation of dicamba in turfgrass. Journal of Environmental Quality 30: 1360-1370.
33. Sahu RK, Mishra SK, Eldho TI, Jain MK. 2007. An advanced soil moisture accounting procedure for SCS curve number method. Hydrological Processes 21: 2872-2881. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6503.
34. Senior M. 2007. A comparison of two hydrologic modeling approaches for the estimation of flood frequency distributions. MASc thesis. McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
35. Tan SBK, Chua LHC, Shuy EB, Lo EY-M, Lim LW. 2008. Performance of rainfall-runoff models calibrated over single and continuous storm flow events. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 13(7): 597-607. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE) 1084-0699(2008)13: 7(597).
36. USDA website. http://www.usda.gov, Official website of the United States Department of Agriculture. Last Accessed 10/11/2008.
37. Viessman WJ, Lewis GL. 2003. Introduction to Hydrology, 5th edn. Prentice Hall: New Jersey, USA.
38. Voorhees ML, Wenzel HG. 1984. Urban design-storm sensitivity and reliability. Journal of Hydrology 68: 39-60.
39. Wenzel HG, Voorhees ML. 1984. An evaluation of urban design storm sensitivity. Water Science Technology 16: 219-236.
40. Willmott CJ. 1982. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin American Meteorological Society 63: 1309-1313.