Statistical analysis of multichannel scalp field data

Electrical Neuroimaging

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 169-190

  Koenig, Thomas ^a   Melie García, Lester ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b CUBAN NEUROSCIENCE CENTER   (Cuba)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC PHYSICS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); ELECTRIC FIELDS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL METHODS;

CORRELATION STRUCTURE; INVERSE SOLUTION; QUALITY OF RESULTS; REPEATED MEASURES; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; STATISTICAL INFERENCE; TEMPORAL SAMPLING; VOLUME CONDUCTION;

ELECTRODES;

EID: 77955465987     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511596889.009     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Gevins A, Le J, Martin NK et al. High resolution EEG: 124-channel recording, spatial deblurring and MRI integration methods. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1994;90:337-358.
2. Michel CM, Thut G, Morand S et al. Electric source imaging of human brain functions. Brain Research. Brain Research Review 2001; 36:108-118.
3. Tucker DM. Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1993;87:154-163.
4. Duffy FH, Bartels PH, Burchfiel JL. Significance probability mapping: an aid in the topographic analysis of brain electrical activity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1981;51:455-462.
5. Steger J, Imhof K, Steinhausen H, Brandeis D. Brain mapping of bilateral interactions in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and control boys. Clinical Neurophysiology 2000;111:1141-1156.
6. Vasey MW, Thayer JF. The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: a multivariate solution. Psychophysiology 1987;24:479-486.
7. Galan L, Biscay R, Rodriguez JL, Perez-Abalo MC, Rodriguez R. Testing topographic differences between event related brain potentials by using non-parametric combinations of permutation tests. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1997;102:240-247.
8. Greenblatt RE, Pflieger ME. Randomization-based hypothesis testing from event-related data. Brain Topography 2004;16:225-232.
9. Karniski W, Blair RC, Snider AD. An exact statistical method for comparing topographic maps, with any number of subjects and electrodes. Brain Topography 1994;6:203-210.
10. Koenig T, Melie-Garcia L, Stein M, StrikW, Lehmann C. Establishing correlations of scalp fieldmaps with other experimental variables using covariance analysis and resampling methods. Clinical Neurophysiology 2008;119:1262-1270.
11. Lobaugh NJ, West R, McIntosh AR. Spatiotemporal analysis of experimental differences in event-related potential data with partial least squares. Psychophysiology 2001;38:517-530.
12. Maris E. Randomization tests for ERP topographies and whole spatiotemporal data matrices. Psychophysiology 2004;41: 142-151.
13. Strik WK, Fallgatter AJ, Brandeis D, Pascual-Marqui RD.Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1998;108:406-413.
14. Edgington ES, Onghena P. Randomization Tests. 4th edn. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2007.
15. Manly BFJ. Randomization, Bootstrap, and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. 3rd edn. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2007.
16. Hoeffding W.The large sample power of tests based on permutations of observations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1952;23:169-192.
17. Kempthorne O, Doerfler TE. The behaviour of some significance tests under experimental randomization. Biometrika 1969;56:231-248.
18. SteinM, Dierks T, Brandeis D et al. Plasticity in the adult language system: a longitudinal electrophysiological study on second language learning. Neuroimage 2006;33:774-783.
19. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 1984;307:161-163.
20. Kondakor I, Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D. Event-related potential map differences depend on the prestimulus microstates. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology 1995;19:66-69.
21. WirthM, Horn H, Koenig T et al. The early context effect reflects activity in the temporo-prefrontal semantic system-evidence from electrical neuroimaging of abstract and concrete word reading. Neuroimage 2008;42:423-436.
22. McIntosh AR, Lobaugh NJ. Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances. Neuroimage 2004;23 Suppl 1:S250-S263.
23. Schumacher R, Wirth M, PerrigWet al. ERP correlates of supraordinate category activation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2009; in press.
24. Friston KJ, Holmes A, Poline JB, Price CJ, Frith CD. Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power. Neuroimage 1996;4:223-235.
25. Nichols TE, Holmes AP. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Human Brain Mapping 2002;15:1-25.
26. Worsley KJ, Taylor JE, Tomaiuolo F, Lerch J. Unified univariate and multivariate random field theory. Neuroimage 2004;23 Suppl 1:S189-S195.
27. Friston KJ, Stephan KE, Lund TE, Morcom A, Kiebel S.Mixed-effects and fMRI studies. Neuroimage 2005;24:244-252.