Primordial perturbations in Einstein-aether and BPSH theories

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Volumn 2010, Issue 7, 2010, Pages

  Armendariz Picon, Cristian ^a,b   Sierra, Noela Fariña ^b   Garriga, Jaume ^b  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cosmological parameters from CMBR; Cosmological perturbation theory; Inflation; Modified gravity

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955447407     PISSN: 14757516     EISSN: 14757516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/07/010     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. G. R. Dvali, G. Gabadadze and M. Porrati, 4D gravity on a brane in 5D Minkowski space, Phys. Lett. B 485 (2000) 208 [hep-th/0005016]
2. A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi and E. Trincherini, The galileon as a local modification of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 064036 [arXiv:0811.2197]
3. C. Deffayet, G. Esposito-Farese and A. Vikman, Covariant galileon, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 084003 [arXiv:0901.1314]
4. P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Cosmology with a time variable cosmological constant, Astrophys. J. 325 (1988) L17
5. This includes the case where we "modify" the Einstein-Hilbert action to an arbitrary function of the Ricci scalar [6, 7], since the resulting theory can be reformulated as a standard scalar-tensor theory [8].
6. S. Capozziello, Curvature quintessence, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 11 (2002) 483 [gr-qc/0201033]
7. S. M. Carroll, V. Duvvuri, M. Trodden and M. S. Turner, Is cosmic speed-up due to new gravitational physics?, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 043528 [astro-ph/0306438]
8. C. M. Will, Theory and experiment in gravitational physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U. K. (1981), pg. 342
9. R. Bousso and J. Polchinski, Quantization of four-form fluxes and dynamical neutralization of the cosmological constant, JHEP 06 (2000) 006 [hep-th/0004134]
10. C. Armendariz-Picon, T. Damour and V. F. Mukhanov, k-Inflation, Phys. Lett. B 458 (1999) 209 [hep-th/9904075];
11. J. Garriga and V. F. Mukhanov, Perturbations in k-inflation, Phys. Lett. B 458 (1999) 219 [hep-th/9904176];
12. C. Armendariz-Picon, V. F. Mukhanov and P. J. Steinhardt, A dynamical solution to the problem of a small cosmological constant and late-time cosmic acceleration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 4438 [astro-ph/0004134];
13. Essentials of k-essence, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 103510 [astro-ph/0006373].
14. N. Arkani-Hamed, H.-C. Cheng, M. A. Luty and S. Mukohyama, Ghost condensation and a consistent infrared modification of gravity, JHEP 05 (2004) 074 [hep-th/0312099].
15. N. Arkani-Hamed, H. Georgi and M. D. Schwartz, Effective field theory for massive gravitons and gravity in theory space, Ann. Phys. 305 (2003) 96 [hep-th/0210184].
16. S. L. Dubovsky, Phases of massive gravity, JHEP 10 (2004) 076 [hep-th/0409124];
17. D. Blas, D. Comelli, F. Nesti and L. Pilo, Lorentz breaking massive gravity in curved space, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 044025 [arXiv:0905.1699].
18. A. H. Chamseddine and V. Mukhanov, Higgs for graviton: simple and elegant solution, arXiv:1002.3877.
19. V. A. Rubakov, Lorentz-violating graviton masses: Getting around ghosts, low strong coupling scale and VDVZ discontinuity, hep-th/0407104.
20. S. L. Dubovsky, P. G. Tinyakov and I. I. Tkachev, Massive graviton as a testable cold dark matter candidate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 181102 [hep-th/0411158];
21. S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger, A. Starobinsky and I. Tkachev, Signatures of a graviton mass in the cosmic microwave background, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 023523 [arXiv:0907.1658];
22. D. Bessada and O. D. Miranda, CMB anisotropies induced by tensor modes in massive gravity, JCAP 08 (2009) 033 [arXiv:0908.1360].
23. T. Damour and I. I. Kogan, Effective Lagrangians and universality classes of nonlinear bigravity, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 104024 [hep-th/0206042].
24. Z. Berezhiani, D. Comelli, F. Nesti and L. Pilo, Spontaneous Lorentz breaking and massive gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 131101 [hep-th/0703264];
25. D. Blas, C. Deffayet and J. Garriga, Bigravity and Lorentz-violating Massive Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 104036 [arXiv:0705.1982];
26. Z. Berezhiani, D. Comelli, F. Nesti and L. Pilo, Exact spherically symmetric solutions in massive gravity, JHEP 07 (2008) 130 [arXiv:0803.1687].
27. C. Armendariz-Picon and A. Diez-Tejedor, Aether unleashed, JCAP 12 (2009) 018 [arXiv:0904.0809].
28. T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, Gravity with a dynamical preferred frame, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 024028 [gr-qc/0007031].
29. A fixed norm vector field determining a preferred frame has also been used in relativistic versions of MOND [22], such as TeVeS [23], which attempt to explain the rotation curves of galaxies without introducing cold dark matter
30. M. Milgrom, A Modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis, Astrophys. J. 270 (1983) 365.
31. J. D. Bekenstein, Relativistic gravitation theory for the MOND paradigm, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 083509 [astro-ph/0403694].
32. I. Low and A. V. Manohar, Spontaneously broken spacetime symmetries and Goldstone's theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 101602 [hep-th/0110285].
33. P. Hořava, Quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 084008 [arXiv:0901.3775];
34. Spectral dimension of the universe in quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 161301 [arXiv:0902.3657].
35. D. Blas, O. Pujolás and S. Sibiryakov, On the extra mode and inconsistency of Hořava gravity, JHEP 10 (2009) 029 [arXiv:0906.3046].
36. D. Blas, O. Pujolás and S. Sibiryakov, Consistent extension of Hořava gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 181302 [arXiv:0909.3525];
37. Comment on 'Strong coupling in extended Hořava-Lifshitz gravity', Phys. Lett. B 688 (2010) 350 [arXiv:0912.0550].
38. T. Jacobson, Extended Hořava gravity and Einstein-aether theory, arXiv:1001.4823.
39. E. A. Lim, Can we see Lorentz-violating vector fields in the CMB?, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 063504 [astro-ph/0407437].
40. B. Li, D. Fonseca Mota and J. D. Barrow, Detecting a Lorentz-Violating Field in cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 024032 [arXiv:0709.4581].
41. J. A. Zuntz, P. G. Ferreira and T. G. Zlosnik, Constraining Lorentz violation with cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 261102 [arXiv:0808.1824].
42. J. Zuntz, T. G. Zlosnik, F. Bourliot, P. G. Ferreira and G. D. Starkman, Vector field models of modified gravity and the dark sector, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 104015 [arXiv:1002.0849].
43. T. Kobayashi, Y. Urakawa and M. Yamaguchi, Cosmological perturbations in a healthy extension of Hořava gravity, JCAP 04 (2010) 025 [arXiv:1002.3101].
44. S. M. Carroll and E. A. Lim, Lorentz-violating vector fields slow the universe down, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 123525 [hep-th/0407149].
45. F. Lucchin and S. Matarrese, Power law inflation, Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 1316.
46. T. Jacobson and D. Mattingly, Einstein-aether waves, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 024003 [gr-qc/0402005].
47. J. M. Cline, S. Jeon and G. D. Moore, The phantom menaced: constraints on low-energy effective ghosts, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 043543 [hep-ph/0311312].
48. C. Armendariz-Picon and E. A. Lim, Vacuum choices and the predictions of inflation, JCAP 12 (2003) 006 [hep-th/0303103].
49. S. Weinberg, Adiabatic modes in cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 123504 [astro-ph/0302326].
50. S. Weinberg, Can non-adiabatic perturbations arise after single-field inflation?, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 043541 [astro-ph/0401313].
51. S. Weinberg, Must cosmological perturbations remain non-adiabatic after multi-field inflation?, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 083522 [astro-ph/0405397].
52. S. Weinberg, Cosmology, Oxford University Press, Oxford U. K. (2008), pg. 593.
53. C. Eling and T. Jacobson, Static post-Newtonian equivalence of GR and gravity with a dynamical preferred frame, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 064005 [gr-qc/0310044].
54. T. Koivisto and D. F. Mota, Dark energy anisotropic stress and large scale structure formation, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 083502 [astro-ph/0512135].
55. S. F. Daniel et al., A multi-parameter investigation of gravitational slip, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 023532 [arXiv:0901.0919].
56. T. Giannantonio, M. Martinelli, A. Silvestri and A. Melchiorri, New constraints on parametrised modified gravity from correlations of the CMB with large scale structure, JCAP 04 (2010) 030 [arXiv:0909.2045].
57. R. Bean and M. Tangmatitham, Current constraints on the cosmic growth history, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 083534 [arXiv:1002.4197].
58. T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese, Testing for preferred frame effects in gravity with artificial earth satellites, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 1693 [gr-qc/9311034].
59. M. L. Graesser, A. Jenkins and M. B. Wise, Spontaneous Lorentz violation and the long-range gravitational preferred-frame effect, Phys. Lett. B 613 (2005) 5 [hep-th/0501223].
60. S. Dodelson and L. Hui, A horizon ratio bound for inflationary fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 131301 [astro-ph/0305113].
61. W. Hu and M. J. White, CMB anisotropies: total angular momentum method, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 596 [astro-ph/9702170].
62. V. Mukhanov, Physical foundations of cosmology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U. K. (2005), pg. 421.
63. I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of integrals, series and products, New York Academic Press, New York U. S. A. (1980).
64. A. A. Starobinsky, Cosmic Background anisotropy induced by isotropic flat-spectrum gravitational-wave perturbations, Sov. Astron. Lett. 11 (1985) 133.
65. M. S. Turner, M. J. White and J. E. Lidsey, Tensor perturbations in inflationary models as a probe of cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 4613 [astro-ph/9306029].
66. B. Withers, Einstein-aether as a quantum effective field theory, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 225009 [arXiv:0905.2446].
67. WMAP collaboration, E. Komatsu et al., Five-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological interpretation, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180 (2009) 330 [arXiv:0803.0547].
68. T. Jacobson, Einstein-aether gravity: a status report, PoS QG-PH (2007) 020 [arXiv:0801.1547].
69. J. F. Bell, F. Camilo and T. Damour, A tighter test of local lorentz invariance using PSR J2317+1439, Astrophys. J. 464 (1996) 857 [astro-ph/9512100].
70. 7 using the sping axis of the sun, Astrophys. J. 320 (1987) 871.
71. J. W. Elliott, G. D. Moore and H. Stoica, Constraining the new aether: gravitational Cherenkov radiation, JHEP 08 (2005) 066 [hep-ph/0505211].
72. A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi, Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion, JHEP 10 (2006) 014 [hep-th/0602178].
73. J.-P. Bruneton, On causality and superluminal behavior in classical field theories. Applications to k-essence theories and MOND-like theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 085013 [gr-qc/0607055].
74. E. Babichev, V. Mukhanov and A. Vikman, k-Essence, superluminal propagation, causality and emergent geometry, JHEP 02 (2008) 101 [arXiv:0708.0561].
75. R. Jackiw, (Constrained) quantization without tears, hep-th/9306075.
76. J. Garriga, X. Montes, M. Sasaki and T. Tanaka, Canonical quantization of cosmological perturbations in the one-bubble open universe, Nucl. Phys. B 513 (1998) 343 [astro-ph/9706229].