Differences in QRS axis measurements, classification of inferior myocardial infarction, and noise tolerance for 12-lead electrocardiograms acquired from monitoring electrode positions compared to standard locations

American Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 106, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 581-586

  Welinder, Annika ^a   Wagner, Galen S ^b   Maynard, Charles ^c   Pahlm, Olle ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIMB MOVEMENT; LUND ELECTRODE PLACEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASON LIKAR ELECTRODE PLACEMENT; NOISE; NOISE TOLERANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QRS COMPLEX; SCORING SYSTEM; WAVEFORM; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INFERIOR WALL MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STANDARDS; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTRODES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFERIOR WALL MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;

EID: 77955433067     PISSN: 00029149     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.073     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. P. Kligfield, L.S. Gettes, J.J. Bailey, R. Childers, B.J. Deal, E.W. Hancock, G. van Herpen, J.A. Kors, P. Macfarlane, D.M. Mirvis, O. Pahlm, P. Rautaharju, and G.S. Wagner Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part I: the electrocardiogram and its technology: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology Circulation 115 2007 1306 1324 (Pubitemid 46594775)
2. R.E. Mason, and I. Likar A new system of multiple-lead exercise electrocardiography Am Heart J 71 1966 196 205
3. M. Papouchado, P.R. Walker, M.A. James, and L.M. Clarke Fundamental differences between the standard 12-lead electrocardiograph and the modified (Mason-Likar) exercise lead system Eur Heart J 8 1987 725 733
4. L. Edenbrandt, O. Pahlm, and L. Srnmo An accurate exercise lead system for bicycle ergometer tests Eur Heart J 10 1989 268 272
5. R.M. Farrell, A. Syed, A. Syed, and D.D. Gutterman Effects of limb electrode placement on the 12-and 16-lead electrocardiogram J Electrocardiol 41 2008 536 545
6. O. Pahlm, and G.S. Wagner Potential solutions for providing standard electrocardiogram recordings from nonstandard recording sites J Electrocardiol 41 2008 207 210
7. D.C. Sevilla, N.B. Wagner, R. Pegues, S. Peck, E. Mikat, R. Ideker, G. Hutchins, K. Reimer, D. Hackel, R. Selvester, and G.S. Wagner Correlation of the complete version of the Selvester QRS scoring system with quantitative anatomic findings for multiple left ventricular myocardial infarcts Am J Cardiol 69 1992 465 469
8. P.W. Macfarlane Evolution of the Glasgow program for computer-assisted reporting of electrocardiograms1964/1998 Acta Cardiol 53 1998 117 120
9. P.W. Macfarlane, B. Devine, and E. Clark The University of Glasgow (Uni-G) ECG analysis program Comput Cardiol 32 2005 451 454
10. R.H. Selvester, G.S. Wagner, and N.B. Hindman The Selvester QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size The development and application of the system Arch Intern Med 145 1985 1877 1881
11. H. Engblom, G.S. Wagner, R.M. Setser, R.H. Selvester, T. Billgren, J.M. Kasper, C. Maynard, O. Pahlm, H. Arheden, and R.D. White Quantitative clinical assessment of chronic anterior myocardial infarction with delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging and QRS scoring Am Heart J 146 2003 359 366
12. R.E. Ideker, G.S. Wagner, W.K. Ruth, D.R. Alonso, S.P. Bishop, C.M. Bloor, J.T. Fallon, G.J. Gottlieb, D.B. Hackel, H.R. Phillips, K.A. Reimer, S.F. Roark, W.J. Rogers, R.M. Savage, R.D. White, and R.H. Selvester Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size II. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for anterior infarcts Am J Cardiol 49 1982 1604 1614
13. S.F. Roark, R.E. Ideker, G.S. Wagner, D.R. Alonso, S.P. Bishop, C.M. Bloor, D.A. Bramlet, J.E. Edwards, J.T. Fallon, G.J. Gottlieb, D.B. Hackel, H.R. Phillips, K.A. Reimer, W.J. Rogers, W.K. Ruth, R.M. Savage, R.D. White, and R.H. Selvester Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size III. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for inferior infarcts Am J Cardiol 51 1983 382 389
14. R.M. Ward, R.D. White, R.E. Ideker, N.B. Hindman, D.R. Alonso, S.P. Bishop, C.M. Bloor, J.T. Fallon, G.J. Gottlieb, D.B. Hackel, G.M. Hutchins, H.R. Phillips, K.A. Reimer, S.F. Roark, S.P. Rochlani, W.J. Rogers, W.K. Ruth, R.M. Savage, J.L. Weiss, R.H. Selvester, and G.S. Wagner Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size IV. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for posterolateral infarcts Am J Cardiol 53 1984 706 714
15. W.D. Anderson, N.B. Wagner, K.L. Lee, R.D. White, J. Yuschak, V.S. Behar, R.H. Selvester, R.E. Ideker, and G.S. Wagner Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size VI: Identification of screening criteria for non-acute myocardial infarcts Am J Cardiol 61 1988 729 733
16. F.N. Wilson The distribution of the potential differences produced by the heart beat within the body and its surface Am Heart J 5 1930 599 616