Interdependence and coordination in the Canadian environmental policy process

Environmental Governance and Decentralisation

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 77-110

  Valiante, Marcia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955428885     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781847209917.00010     Document Type: Chapter

References (70)

1. Alberta Environment (2003), Compliance Assessment and Enforcement Initiatives, Annual Report, April 1, 2002-March 31, 2003.
2. Amos, William, Kathryn Harrison and George Hoberg (2001), 'In search of a minimum winning coalition: The politics of species-at-risk legislation in Canada', in K. Beazley and R. Boardman (eds), Politics of the Wild: Canada and Endangered Species, Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford University Press, pp. 137-66.
3. Barg, Stephan (2000), 'Economic instruments for environmental policy making in Ontario', in Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Managing the Environment Report, Volume II, Research Papers, December 2000.
4. Benidickson, Jamie (2002), Essentials of Canadian Law: Environmental Law, 2nd edn, Toronto: Irwin Law.
5. Borrows, John (1997), 'Living between water and rocks - first nations, environmental planning and democracy', University of Toronto Law Journal, 47(4), 417-68.
6. Boyd, David (2003), Unnatural Law: Rethinking Canadian Environmental Law and Policy, Vancouver: UBC Press.
7. Cameron, David and Richard Simeon (2002), 'Intergovernmental relations in Canada: The emergence of collaborative federalism', Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 32(2), 49-71.
8. Canada, External Advisory Committee on Smart Regulation (2003a), Regulating in the 21st Century: Global Changes and Implications for Regulation, September.
9. Canada, External Advisory Committee on Smart Regulation (2003b), The Regulatory Process: Enabling Smart Regulation; A Dialogue with Stakeholders, September.
10. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (1998), 'Canada-Wide Accord on Environmental Harmonization', www.ccme.ca/assets/pdf/accord_harmonization_e.pdf.
11. CCME (2003), Five-Year Review of the Harmonization Accord, October.
12. CEAA (2004), Considering Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Assessments under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act: Interim Principles.
13. Doern, G. Bruce (2000), 'Patient science versus science on demand: The stretching of green science at environment Canada', in G.B. Doern and T. Reed (eds), Risky Business: Canada's Changing Science-Based Policy and Regulatory Regime, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 286-306.
14. Doern, G. Bruce and Thomas Conway (1994), The Greening of Canada: Federal Institutions and Decisions, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
15. Doyle-Bedwell, Patricia and Fay G. Cohen (2001), 'Aboriginal peoples in Canada: Their role in shaping environmental trends in the twenty-first century', in Edward A. Parson (ed.), Governing the Environment: Persistent Challenges, Uncertain Innovations, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 169-206.
16. Duncan, Linda (2003), 'Enforcement and compliance', in E. Hughes, A. Lucas and W. Tilleman (eds), Environmental Law and Policy, 3rd edn, Toronto: Emond Montgomery.
17. Elgie, Stewart A.G. (1993), 'Environmental groups and the courts: 1970-1992', in G. Thompson, M.L. McConnell and L.B. Heustis (eds), Environmental Law and Business in Canada, Toronto: Canada Law Book.
18. Environment Canada (2001), Policy Framework for Environmental Performance Agreements (June), Ottawa.
19. Environment Canada (2002), CEPA Annual Report: April 2001-March 2002.
20. Environmental Commissioner of Ontario (2001), 2000/2001 Annual Report.
21. Environmental Commissioner of Ontario (2002), Developing Sustainability: 2001-2002 Annual Report (September).
22. Fafard, Patrick (1998), 'Green harmonization: The success and failure of recent environmental intergovernmental relations', in H. Lazar (ed.), Canada: The State of the Federation, 1997, Non-Constitutional Renewal, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
23. Government of Canada, Council of Science and Technology Advisors (1999), Building Excellence in Science and Technology: The Federal Roles in Performing Science and Technology.
24. Gwich'in Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement (2002), 'Annual Report of the Implementation Committee. April 1, 2001-March 31, 2002', www.aincinac.gc.ca/pr/agr/gwich/anrh_e.pdf.
25. Harrison, Kathryn (1996), Passing the Buck: Federalism and Canadian Environmental Policy, Vancouver: UBC Press.
26. Harrison,Kathryn (1999), 'Retreat from regulation: The evolution of the Canadian environmental regulatory regime', in G. Bruce Doern, M. Hill, M.J. Prince and R.J. Schultz (eds), Changing the Rules: Canadian Regulatory Regimes and Institutions, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 122-42.
27. Harrison, Kathryn (2001), 'Voluntarism and environmental governance', in Edward A. Parson (ed.), Governing the Environment: Persistent Challenges, Uncertain Innovations, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 207-46.
28. Harrison, Kathryn (2002), 'Federal-provincial relations and the environment: Unilateralism, collaboration, and rationalization', in Debora L. VanNijnatten and Robert Boardman (eds), Canadian Environmental Policy: Context and Cases, 2nd edn, Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford University Press, ch. 7.
29. Harrison, Kathryn and Werner Antweiler (2001), 'Environmental regulation vs. environmental information: A view from Canada's national pollutant release inventory', 25 January, www.policy.ca.
30. Hoberg, George (1997), 'Governing the environment: Comparing Canada and the United States', in Keith Banting, George Hoberg and Richard Simeon (eds), Degrees of Freedom: Canada and the United States in a Changing World, Montreal: McGill-Queen's, ch. 9.
31. Holland, Kenneth M. (2000), 'Introduction', in Kenneth M. Holland, F.L. Morton and Brian Galligan (eds), Federalism and the Environment: Environmental Policymaking in Australia, Canada and the United States, Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
32. Hornung, Robert (1999), 'The VCR doesn't work', in Robert Gibson (ed.), Voluntary Initiatives: The New Politics of Corporate Greening, Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, pp. 134-40.
33. House of Commons Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development (1998), Enforcing Canada's Pollution Laws: The Public Interest Must Come First!, Third Report, May 1998.
34. Howlett, Michael (2002), 'Policy instruments and implementation styles: The evolution of instrument choice in Canadian environmental policy', in Debora L. VanNijnatten and Robert Boardman (eds), Canadian Environmental Policy: Context and Cases, 2nd edn, Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford University Press.
35. Industry Canada (2000), A Framework for Science and Technology Advice: Principles and Guidelines for the Effective Use of Science and Technology in Government Decision Making, May.
36. Keay, Ian and Cherie Metcalf (2004), 'Aboriginal rights, customary law and the economics of renewable resource exploitation', Canadian Public Policy-Analyse de Politiques, 30(1), 1-22.
37. Kennett, Steven A. (2000), 'Meeting the intergovernmental challenge of environmental assessment', Patrick C. Fafard and Kathryn Harrison (eds), Managing the Environmental Union: Intergovernmental Relations and Environmental Policy in Canada, Kingston: School of Policy Studies, Queen's University, pp. 105-32.
38. Krajnc, Anita (2000), 'Wither Ontario's environment? Neo-Conservatism and the decline of the environment ministry', Canadian Public Policy, 26(1), 111-27.
39. Lawrence, Sonia and Patrick Macklem (2000), 'From consultation to reconciliation: Aboriginal rights and the crown's duty to consult', Canadian Bar Review, 79, p. 252.
40. Lee, Eugene and Anthony Perl (2003), 'Introduction: Institutions and the integrity gap in Canadian environmental policy', in E. Lee and A. Perl (eds), The Integrity Gap: Canada's Environmental Policy and Institutions, Vancouver: UBC Press.
41. Lukasik, Linda (1999), 'The Dofasco deal', in Robert Gibson (ed.), Voluntary Initiatives: The New Politics of Corporate Greening, Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, pp. 141-8.
42. Macdonald, Douglas (2002), 'The business response to environmentalism', in Debora L. VanNijnatten and Robert Boardman (eds), Canadian Environmental Policy: Context and Cases, 2nd edn, Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford University Press, pp. 66-86.
43. Madé, Bernard (2001), 'Experience using tradable permits to eliminate methyl bromide', in Environment Canada, Supporting a Sustainable Future: Making Dollars and Sense; An International Conference on the Use of Economic Incentives and Instruments in Environmental Policy: Conference Summary and Analysis.
44. Meekison, J. Peter, Hamish Telford and Harvey Lazar (2003), 'The institutions of executive federalism: Myths and realities', in J. Peter Meekison et al. (eds), Canada: The State of the Federation, 2002, Reconsidering the Institutions of Canadian Federalism, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
45. Moffet, John and François Bregha (1999), 'Responsible care: Canada's most influential initiative offers many lessons but its biggest challenges may lie ahead', in Robert Gibson (ed.), Voluntary Initiatives: The New Politics of Corporate Greening, Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, pp. 69-92.
46. Nisga'a Final Agreement (2002), 'Annual Report', www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/pr/agr/nsga/.
47. OECD (2002a), Governance for Sustainable Development: Five OECD Case Studies, Paris: OECD.
48. OECD (2002b), Reviews of Regulatory Reform: Canada: Maintaining Leadership Through Innovation, Paris: OECD.
49. OECD (2002c), Canada. Country Performance Review, Paris: OECD.
50. OECD (2003), Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Usage in Policy Mixes, Paris: OECD.
51. Office of the Auditor General of Canada (2000), 2000 Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development, Ottawa.
52. Ontario, Ministry of the Attorney General (2002), Report of the Walkerton Inquiry, Part One, Toronto: Queen's Printer.
53. Paehlke, Robert (2000), 'Environmentalism in one country: Canadian environmental policy in an era of globalization', Policy Studies Journal, 28(1), 160-75.
54. Paehlke, Robert (2001), 'Spatial proportionality: Right sizing environmental decision-making', in Edward A. Parson (ed.), Governing the Environment: Persistent Challenges, Uncertain Innovations, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
55. Parson, Edward A. (2001), 'Persistent challenges, uncertain innovations: A synthesis', in Edward A. Parson (ed.), Governing the Environment: Persistent Challenges, Uncertain Innovations, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 345-89.
56. Poelzer, Greg (2002), 'Aboriginal peoples and environmental policy in Canada: No longer at the margins', in Debora L. VanNijnatten and Robert Boardman (eds), Canadian Environmental Policy: Context and Cases, 2nd edn, Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford University Press, pp. 87-106.
57. Privy Council Office (2003), A Framework for the Application of Precaution in Science-based Decision Making about Risk.
58. Rabe, Barry G. (1997), 'The politics of sustainable development: impediments to pollution prevention and policy integration in Canada', Canadian Public Administration, 40(3), 415-35.
59. Rabe, Barry G. (1999), 'Federalism and entrepreneurship: Explaining American and Canadian innovation in pollution prevention and regulation integration', Policy Studies Journal, 27, 288-306.
60. Schrecker, Ted (2001), 'Using science in environmental policy: Can Canada do better?', in Edward A. Parson (ed.), Governing the Environment: Persistent Challenges, Uncertain Innovations, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 31-72.
61. Skogstad, Grace (1996), 'Intergovernmental relations and the politics of environmental protection in Canada', in Kenneth M. Holland, F.L. Morton and Brian Galligan (eds), Federalism and the Environment: Environmental Policymaking in Australia, Canada and the United States, Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, ch. 5.
62. Treasury Board Secretariat (2000), The Integrated Risk Management Framework.
63. Valiante, Marcia (2002a), 'Legal foundations of Canadian environmental policy: Underlining our values in a shifting landscape', in Debora L. VanNijnatten and Robert Boardman (eds), Canadian Environmental Policy: Context and Cases, 2nd edn, Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-24.
64. Valiante, Marcia (2002b), '"Welcomed participants" or "environmental vigilantes"? The CEPA environmental protection action and the role of citizen suits in Canadian environmental law', Dalhousie Law Journal, 25, 81-111.
65. VanNijnatten, Debora L. (1999), 'The ARET challenge', in Robert Gibson (ed.), Voluntary Initiatives: The New Politics of Corporate Greening, Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, pp. 93-100.
66. VanNijnatten, Debora L. (2002), 'The bumpy journey ahead: Provincial environmental policies and national environmental standards', in Debora L. VanNijnatten and Robert Boardman (eds), Canadian Environmental Policy: Context and Cases, 2nd edn, Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford University Press, ch. 8.
67. Vourc'h, Ann (2001), 'Encouraging sustainable growth in Canada', Working Paper No. 290, Paris: OECD.
68. Webb, Kernaghan (2000), 'Gorillas in closets? Federal-provincial Fisheries Act pollution control enforcement', in Patrick C. Fafard and Kathryn Harrison (eds), Managing the Environmental Union: Intergovernmental Relations and Environmental Policy in Canada, Kingston: School of Policy Studies, Queen's University, ch. 7.
69. Wilson, Jeremy (2002), 'Continuity and change in the Canadian environmental movement: Assessing the effects of institutionalization', in Debora L. VanNijnatten and Robert Boardman (eds), Canadian Environmental Policy: Context and Cases, 2nd edn, Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford University Press, pp. 46-65.
70. Winfield, Mark S. (2002), 'Environmental policy and federalism', in Herman Bakvis and Grace Skogstad (eds), Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness and Legitimacy, Don Mills, Ont.: Oxford University Press, ch. 7.