Measuring Operations: An Analysis of US Private Colleges and Universities’ Financial Statements

Financial Accountability and Management

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 129-151

  Fischer, Mary ^a   Gordon, Teresa P ^b   Greenlee, Janet ^c   Keating, Elizabeth K ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT TYLER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON   (United States)

^d HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

accountability; higher education; operating measure; statement of activities

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955419685     PISSN: 02674424     EISSN: 14680408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2004.00190.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, AICPA 2001, Proposed Statement of Position – Accounting for Certain Costs and Activities Related to Property, Plant and Equipment(Exposure Draft 6/29/01, New York).
2. Chabotar, K.J. 1989, ‘Financial Ratio Analysis Comes to Nonprofits’, Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 188–209.
3. Dickmeyer, N. and K.S. Hughes 1980, Financial Self-Assessment: A Workbook for College, National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO, Washington DC).
4. DiSalvio, P. 1989, ‘Ratio Analysis in Higher Education: Caveat Emptor’, Journal of Education Finance. Vol. 14, pp. 500–12.
5. Engstrom, J.H. 1988, Information Needs of College and University Financial Decision Makers, Research Report (Government Accounting Standards Board, Norwalk, CT).
6. Engstrom, J.H. and C. Esmond-Kiger 1997, ‘Different Formats, Same User Needs: A Comparison of the FASB and GASB College and University Financial Reporting Models’, Accounting Horizons, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 16–34.
7. Financial Accounting Standards Board, FASB 1987, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 95 – Statement of Cash Flows(FASB, Norwalk, CT).
8. Financial Accounting Standards Board, FASB 1993a, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 116 – Accounting for Contributions Received and Made(FASB, Norwalk, CT).
9. Financial Accounting Standards Board, FASB 1993b, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 117 – Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Organizations(FASB, Norwalk, CT).
10. Financial Accounting Standards Board, FASB 1995, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 124 – Accounting for Certain Investments Held by Not-for-Profit Organizations(FASB, Norwalk, CT).
11. Financial Accounting Standards Board, FASB 2003, Jan. 31, The FASB Report: Technical Plans for the Quarter Ended December 31, 2002(FASB, Norwalk, CT).
12. Fitch Inc. 2001, July 27, ‘Rating Guidelines for Private Colleges and Universities’ (http://www.fitchratings.com), accessed 4/6/03.
13. Fitch Inc. 2003, Feb. 3, ‘Best Management Practices in Higher Education: Impact of Management Practices on Higher Education Credit Ratings’ (http://www.fitchratings.com), accessed 4/6/03.
14. Fischer, M. 1997, ‘Two Accounting Standard Setters: One Industry’, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, Vol. 9, No 2 (Summer), pp. 251–84.
15. Fischer, M. and T. Gordon 2002, ‘Inching Toward an Operating Measure’, Business Officer, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 39–43.
16. Fischer, M., T. Gordon and M. Kraut 2002, ‘An Examination of Differences between Financial Information Provided in IRS Form 990 and Audited Financial Statement Data of U.S. Private Colleges and Universities’, Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 87–104.
17. Fischer, M., T. Gordon D. Malone and M. Kraut 2002, ‘Reporting Cash Flows: An Investigation of College and University Compliance with SFAS No. 117’, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 331–59.
18. Geiger, R.L. 1986, Private Sectors in Higher Education: Structure, Function, and Change in Eight Countries(University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).
19. Government Accounting Standards Board, GASB 1989, Statement No. 9: Reporting Cash Flows of Proprietary and Nonexpendable Trust Funds and Governmental Entities That Use Proprietary Fund Accounting(GASB, Norwalk, CT).
20. Government Accounting Standards Board, GASB 1999a, Statement No. 34: Basic Financial Statements – and Management's Discussion and Analysis – for State and Local Governments(GASB, Norwalk, CT).
21. Government Accounting Standards Board, GASB 1999b, Statement No. 35: Basic Financial Statements – and Management's Discussion and Analysis – for Public Colleges and Universities(GASB, Norwalk, CT).
22. Goldstein, L. 2002, ‘To Measure or Not to Measure – That's Still in Question’, Business Officer, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 31–37.
23. Gordon, T.P. and S.B. Khumawala 1999, ‘The Demand for Nonprofit Financial Statements: A Model of Individual Giving’, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 18, pp. 31–56.
24. Higher Education Act (HEA) 1994, Standards for Financial Responsibility of Institutions Participating in Title IV 34 CFR 668.15(US Department of Education, Washington, DC).
25. Higher Education Publications 2000, Higher Education Directory (HED) (Higher Education Publications, Inc., Falls Church, VA).
26. Independent Sector 2002, The New Nonprofit Almanac & Desk Reference, Independent Sector (Washington, DC, excerpts available at http://www.independentsector.org), accessed 4/6/03.
27. KPMG LLP and Prager, McCarthy & Sealy, LLC 1999, Ratio Analysis in Higher Education: Measuring Past Performance to Chart Future Direction, For Independent Institutions(4th ed., KPMG LLP).
28. Lane, F.S., J.S. Lawrence and H. Mertins 1987, ‘University Financial Analysis Using Interinstitutional Data’, New Directions for Institutional Research, Vol. 4 (Spring), pp. 83–101.
29. Minter, J., K.S. Hughes, D.D. Robinson, F.J. Turk, A.D. Buchanan and F.J. Prager 1982, ‘Using Ratio Analysis to Evaluate Financial Performance’, New Directions for Higher Education, Vol. 10, No. 2 (June), pp. 25–38.
30. Moody's Investor Service 1999a, February, Special Comment: Moody's Introduces New Concepts to Measure Operating Performance and Leverage: Evaluation of Creditworthiness Improved for Colleges, Universities, and Other Not-for-Profit Organizations (Moody's Investor Service, http://www.moodys.com), accessed 12/10/01.
31. Moody's Investor Service 1999b, September, Rating Methodology: Moody's Rating Approach for Private Colleges and Universities (Moody's Investor Service, http://www.moodys.com), accessed 12/12/01.
32. Moody's Investor Service 2002, September, Rating Methodology: Moody's Rating Approach for Private Colleges and Universities (Moody's Investor Service, http://www.moodys.com), accessed 4/6/03.
33. National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) 2001, Education Statistics Quarterly (http://www.nces.ed.gov\quicktables).
34. National Postsecondary Education Cooperative (NPEC) 2000, Proceedings NPEC/NACUBO FORUM Institutional Operating Measures(Washington, DC, September 13–14).
35. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. 1982, Ratio Analysis in Higher Education: Independent Institutions(Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.).
36. Population Reference Bureau 2002, World Population Data Sheet (http://www.data.worldpop.org), accessed 11/10/02.
37. Standard & Poor’s, S&P 2001, July 19, Ratios for Private Colleges and Universities (S&P, http://www.standardandpoors.com), accessed 12/10/01.
38. Standard & Poor’s, S&P 2002a, Nov. 26, Weak Equity Markets Hurt U.S. Higher Education Endowments (S&P, http://www.standardandpoors.com), accessed 4/6/03.
39. Standard & Poor’s, S&P 2002b, Nov. 13, Public Finance Criteria: Higher Education (S&P, http://www.standardandpoors.com), accessed 4/6/03.
40. Standard & Poor’s, S&P 2003, April, Public Finance Criteria: Higher Education Changing by Degrees: University Credit Ratings (S&P, http://www.standardandpoors.com), accessed 4/6/03.
41. Weis, F.M. 1999, Survey of Financial Statements of National Liberal Arts Colleges(Clarement McKenna College, Clarement, CA).