Gene action for morphological, anatomical and biochemical traits in inter-specific crosses of cotton

Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 38-43

  Amolic, V L ^a   Mehetre, S S ^a   Shinde, G C ^a  

^a MAHATMA PHULE KRISHI VIDYAPEETH   (India)

Author keywords

Anatomical and biochemical characters; Gene action; Generation means; Gossypium anomalum; Gossypium arboreum; Interspecific crosses

Indexed keywords

GOSSYPIUM; GOSSYPIUM ANOMALUM; GOSSYPIUM ARBOREUM; GOSSYPIUM CAPITIS-VIRIDIS; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 77955405078     PISSN: 00195200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bhatt J. G. and Andal R. 1979. Variation in foliar anatomy of cotton. Proceedings of Indian Academy of Sciences B (part II), 88: 451-453.
2. Maite R. K., Bidinger F. R., Sheshu Reddy K. V. and Davies J. K. 1980. Nature and occurance of trichomes in sorghum lines with resistance to the sorghum shootfly. Joint progress report of Sorghum Physiology-3, Sorghum Entomology-3, ICRISAT, Patancheru, India.
3. Sharma H. C. and Nwanze K. F. 1997. Mechanism of resistance to insect in sorghum and their usefulness in crop improvement. Information Bull. No. 45, ICRISAT, Patencheru, A. P., India.
4. Arnon D. I. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts in Beeta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 24: 1-15.
5. Sadasivam S. and Manikam A. 1992. In: Bio chemicals methods for agricultural sciences, Willey Eastern Limited, New Delhi, pp. 10-11.
6. Bell A. A. 1967. Formation of gossypol in infected or chemically irritated tissue of Gossypium species. Phytopath., 57: 759-764.
7. Hayman B. T. 1958. Separation of epistasis from additive and dominance variation in generation mean. Heredity, 12: 371-391.
8. Gamble E. E. 1962. Gene effects in corn (Zea maize L.) I. Seperation and relative importance of gene effects for yield. Can. J. Pl. Sci., 42: 339-348.
9. White T. G. and Richmond T. R. 1963. Heterosis and combining ability in top and diallel crosses among positive. Foreign and cultivated American upland cotton. Crop Sci., 3: 58-62.
10. Kolte T. B. and Thombre M. V. 1981. Inheritance studies of some qualitative traits in G. hirsutum L. and G. barbadense L. Cotton. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 6: 94-96.
11. Rao P. S. 1982. Studies on heterosis and combining ability in diallel crosses in cotton. M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis. A. P. A. U., Hyderabad.
12. Gupta S. P. and Singh T. H. 1986. Diallel analysis of earliness and plant height in upland cotton. Crop Improv., 13: 122-125.
13. Barens C. E. and Staten P. C. 1961. The combining ability of some varieties and strains of G. hirsutum L. New Mexico Agri. Expt. Sta. Bull., p. 457.
14. Baker J. L. and Verhalen L. M. 1975. Heterosis and combining ability for several agronomic and fibre properties among selected lines. Cotton Gr. Rev., 52: 209-223.
15. Holla Udaykumar. 1986. L × T analysis of combining ability and heterosis in G. herbaceum L. × G. arboreum L. cotton. Mysore J. Agric. Sci., 20: 155.
16. Gawand P. B., Jadhav M. G. and Thombre M. V. 1985. Gene effects for qualitative characters in cotton. J. Maharashtra agric. Univ., 10: 151-153.
17. Mehetre S. S., Rajput H. J. and Shinde G. C. 2003. Genetic analysis for seed cotton yield and its components in G. hirsutum. J. Cotton Res. Dev., 17: 199-122.
18. Singh M. and Raut R. N. 1983. Genetical researchers in cotton and jute. ICAR, New Delhi.
19. Phul P. S., Bajaj R. K. and Gill K. S. 1977. Inheritance of chlorophyll-a and b in pearl millet. Crop Improv., 4: 35-40.