Evaluation of experimental parameters in the microbond test with regard to lyocell fibers

Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites

Volumn 29, Issue 15, 2010, Pages 2356-2367

  Adusumalli, Ramesh Babu ^a,b   Weber, Hedda K ^b,c   Roeder, Thomas ^c   Sixta, Herbert ^c,d   Gindl, Wolfgang ^b,e  

^a SWISS FEDERAL LABORATORIES FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^b KOMPETENZZENTRUM HOLZ GMBH   (Austria)

^c LENZING AG   (Austria)

^d AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

Author keywords

embedded length; fiber matrix adhesion; interfacial shear strength; lyocell fibers; microbond technique; polymer matrices

Indexed keywords

FIBER-MATRIX ADHESION; INTERFACIAL SHEAR STRENGTH; LYOCELL FIBER; MICROBOND TECHNIQUES; POLYMER MATRICES;

ADHESION; ASPECT RATIO; CELLULOSE; CONTACT ANGLE; TEXTILE FIBERS; THERMOSETS;

SHEAR STRENGTH;

ADHESION; CELLULOSE; CONTACT ANGLE; FIBERS; INTERFACES; TENSILE STRENGTH; TEXTILE FIBERS; THERMOSETS;

EID: 77955391050     PISSN: 07316844     EISSN: 15307964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0731684409349929     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Mohanthy, A.K., Misra, M. and Hinrichsen, G. (2000). Biofibres, Biodegradable Polymers and Biocomposites, Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 276-277 (1). 1-24.
2. Kessler, R.W. and Kohler, R. (1996). New Strategies for Exploiting Flax and Hemp, Chemtech, 26: 34-42.
3. Ganster, J., Fink, H.P. and Pinnow, M. (2006). High-tenacity Regenerated Cellulose Fibre Reinforced Thermoplastics - Injection Moulding Compounds With Polypropylene and Alternative Matrices, Composites Part A, 37: 1796-1804.
4. Franko, A., Seavy, K.C., Gumaer, J. and Glasser, W.G. (2001). Continious Cellulose Fibre-reinforced Cellulose Ester Composites III - Commercial Matrix and Fibre Options, Cellulose, 8: 171-179.
5. Lutzkendorf, R., Mieck, K.P., Reußmann, T., Nechwatal, A. and Eilers, M. (2000). Lyocellfasern - ihr Entwicklungsstand Unter dem Aspekt des Einsatzes in Composites, In: Third International Wood and Natural Fibre Composite Symposium, Kassel, Germany.
6. Woodings, C. (2001). Regenerated Cellulose Fibres, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK.
7. Adusumalli, R.B., Reifferscheid, M., Weber, H., Roeder, T., Sixta, H. and Gindl, W. (2006). Mechanical Properties of Regenerated Cellulose Fibres for Composites, Macromolecular Symposia, 244: 119-125.
8. Chawla, K.K. (1998). Composite Materials, 2 nd edn, pp. 101-133, Springer-Verlag, New York.
9. Zhandarov, S. and MCurrency signder, E. (2005). Characterization of Fibre/Matrix Interface Strength: Applicability of Different Tests, Approaches and Parameters, Composite Science and Technology, 65: 149-160.
10. Mottershead, B. and Eichhorn, S.J. (2007). Deformation Micromechanics of Model Regenerated Cellulose Fibre-epoxy/Polyester Composites, Composites Science and Technology, 67: 2150-2159.
11. Miller, B., Muri, P. and Rebenfeld, L. (1987). A Microbond Method for Determination of the Shear Strength of a Fibre/Resin Interface, Composite Science and Technology, 28: 17-32.
12. Gaur, U. and Miller, B. (1989). Microbond Method for Determination of the Shear Strength of Fibre/Resin Interface: Evaluation of Experimental Parameters, Composite Science and Technology, 34: 35-51.
13. Drzal, L.T., Herrera-Franco, P.J. and Ho, H. (2000). Fibre-matrix Interface Tests, In: Kelly, A. and Zweben, C. (eds), Comprehensive Composite Materials, pp. 71-111, Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford.
14. Straub, A., Slivka, M. and Schwartz, P. (1997). A Study of the Effects of Time and Temperature on the Fibre/Matrix Interface Strength Using the Microbond Test, Composite Science and Technology, 57: 991-994.
15. Pisanova, E., Zhandarov, S., MCurrency signder, E., Ahmad, I. and Young, R.J. (2001). Three Techniques of Interfacial Bond Strength Estimation From Direct Observation of Crack Initiation and Propagation in Polymer-fibre Systems, Composites Part A, 32: 435-443.
16. Stamboulis, A., Baillie, C. and Schulz, E. (1999). Interfacial Characterization of Flax Fibre-thermoplastic Polymer Composites by the Pull-out Test, Die Angewandte Makromoleculare Chemie, 272: 117-120.
17. Pitkethly, M.J., Favre, J.P., Gaur, U., Jakubowski, J., Mudrich, S.F., Caldwell, D.L., Drzal, L.T., Nardin, M., Wagner, H.D., Di Landro, L., Hampe, A., Armistead, J.P., Desaeger, M. and Verpoest, I. (1993). A Round-Robin Programme on Interfacial Test Methods, Composite Science and Technology, 48: 205-214.
18. Craven, J.P., Cripps, R. and Viney, C. (2000). Evaluating the Silk/Epoxy Interface by Means of the Microbond Test, Composites Part A, 31: 653-660.
19. Baley, C., Busnel, F., Grohens, Y. and Sire, O. (2006). Influence of Chemical Treatments on Surface Properties and Adhesion of Flax Fibre-polyester Resin, Composites Part A, 37: 1626-1637.
20. Nam, S. and Netravali, A.N. (2004). Characterization of Ramie Fibre/Soy Protein Concentrate (SPN) Resin Interface, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 18 (9). 1063-1076.
21. Silva, J.L.G. and Al-qureshi, H.A. (1999). Mechanics of Wetting Systems of Natural Fibres with Polymeric Resin, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 92-93: 124-128.
22. Song, B., Bismarck, A., Tahhan, R. and Springer, J. (1998). A Generalized Drop Length-Height Method for Determination of Contact Angle in Drop-on-fibre Systems, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 197 (1). 68-77.
23. Wielage, B., Lampke, Th., Marx, G., Nestler, K. and Starke, D. (1993). Thermogravimetric and Differential Scanning Calorimetric Analysis of Natural Fibres and Polypropylene, Thermochimica Acta, 337 (1-2). 169-177.
24. Persin, Z., Stanta-Kleinschek, K. and Kreze, T. (2002). Hydrophilic/Hydrophobic Characteristics of Different Cellulose Fibres Monitored by Tensiometry, Croatica chemica acta, 75 (1). 271-280.
25. Broutmann, L.J. (1969). Measurement of the Fibre-Polymer Matrix Interfacial Strength. ASTM Digital Library-Symposia Papers/STPs-1969-STP 452-Interfaces in Composites, pp. 27-41.