Phylogenetic isolation of host trees affects assembly of local Heteroptera community

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 277, Issue 1691, 2010, Pages 2227-2236

  Vialatte, A ^a,f   Bailey, R I ^a,g   Vasseur, C ^a   Matocq, A ^b   Gossner, M M ^c   Everhart, D ^a   Vitrac, X ^d   Belhadj, A ^d   Ernoult, A ^a   Prinzing, A ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

^b MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^c FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^e WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^f UMR 1201 Dynafor   (France)

^g UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Canopy; Community assembly; Evolutionary landscape; Habitat fragmentation; Metapopulation; Trophic level

Indexed keywords

ASSEMBLY RULE; CANOPY; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HOST PLANT; HOST SPECIFICITY; INSECT; ISLAND BIOGEOGRAPHY; METAPOPULATION; NUTRITIVE VALUE; OMNIVORY; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SELECTION; SPECIALIST; TROPHIC LEVEL;

EID: 77955388690     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0365     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. APG. 2003 An update of the Angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II Bot. J Linn. Soc. 141, 399-436. (doi:10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.t01-1-00158.x)
2. Borghetti, M. & Giannini, R. 2001 Natural regeneration in Woodland management. In Encyclopedia of life support systems. Oxford, UK: Eolss Publishers.
3. Brändie, M. & Brandl, R. 2006 Is the composition of phytophagous insects and parasitic fungi among trees predictable? Oikos 113, 296-304. (doi:10.1111/j.2006. 0030-1299.14418.x) (Pubitemid 43781670)
4. Brown, J. H. & Kodric-Brown, A. 1977 Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58, 445-449. (doi:10.2307/1935620)
5. Cornelissen, J. H. C. et al 2003 Handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Austral J. Bot. 51, 335-380. (doi:10. 1071/BT02124)
6. Chase, J. M. & Leibold, M. A. 2003 Ecological niches. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7. Danielson, B. J. 1991 Communities in a landscape: The influence of habitat heterogeneity on the interactions between species. Am. Nat. 138, 1105-1120. (doi:10.1086/285272)
8. Garrett, K. A. & Mundt, C. C. 1999 Epidemiology in mixed host populations. Phytopath. 89, 984-990. (doi:10.1094/ PHYTO. 1999.89.11.984)
9. Gilbert, G. S. & Webb, C. O. 2007 Phylogenetic signal in plant pathogen-host range. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 104, 4979-4983. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 0607968104)
10. Gilpin, M. E. & Hanski, I. A. 1991 Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations. London, UK: Academic Press.
11. Goßner, M. M., Chao, A., Bailey, R. I. & Prinzing, A. 2009 Native fauna on exotic trees: phylogenetic conservation and geographic contingency in two lineages of phytophages on two lineages of trees. Am. Nat. 173, 599-614.
12. Hirao, T., Murakami, M. & Oguma, H. 2008 Functional spatial scale of community composition change in response to windthrow disturbance in a deciduous temperate forest. Ecol. Res. 23, 249-258. (doi:10.1007/ si 1284-007-0372-1)
13. Holt, R. D. 1996 Food webs in space: an island biogeographic perspective. In Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics (eds G. A. Polis & K. O. Winemiller), pp. 313-323. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.
14. Holt, R. D. 1997 From metapopulation dynamics to community structure: some consequences of spatial heterogeneity. In Metapopulation biology (eds I. A. Hanski & M. E. Gilpin), pp. 149-164. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15. Holt, R. D. & Keitt, T. H. 2000 Alternative causes for range limits: a metapopulation perspective. Ecol. Lett. 3, 41-47. (doi:10.1046/j.l461-0248. 2000.00116.x)
16. Holt, R. D., Barfield, M. & Gonzalez, A. 2003 Impacts of environmental variability in open populations and communities: 'inflation' in sink environments. Theor. Popul Biol. 64, 315-330. (doi:10.1016/S0040-5809(03) 00087-x)
17. Holyoak, M. 2000 Habitat subdivision causes changes in food web structure. Ecol. Lett. 3, 509-515. (doi:10. 1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00180.x)
18. Johnson, J. B. & Omland, K. S. 2004 Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 101-108. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.013)
19. Kennedy, C. E. J. & Southwood, T. R. E. 1984 The number of species of insects associated with British trees: a reanalysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 53, 455-478. (doi:10.2307/4528)
20. Lawton, J. H. 1995 Population dynamics principles. In Extinction rates (eds R. H. Lawton & R. M. May), pp. 147-163. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford Press.
21. Legendre, P., Galzin, R. & Harmelin-Vivien, M. L. 1997 Relating behavior to habitat: solutions to the fourth-corner problem. Ecobgy 78, 547-562. (doi:10.1890/03-0677)
22. Legendre, P., Dale, M. R. T., Fortin, M.-J., Casgrain, P. & Gurevitch, J. 2004 Effects of spatial structures on the results of field experiments. Ecology 85, 3202-3214. (doi:10.1890/03-0677)
23. Leibold, M. A. & Miller, T. E. 2004 From metapopulations to metacommunities. In Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations (eds I. Hanski & O. E. Gaggiotti), pp. 133-150. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier/ Academic Press.
24. Leibold, M. A. et al. 2004 The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 1, 601-613.
25. Levins, R. 1969 Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15, 237-240.
26. Lewis, T. & Taylor, L. R. 1965 Diurnal periodicity of flight by insects. Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 6, 393-469.
27. MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. 1967 An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution 17, 373-387. (doi:10.2307/2407089)
28. Magallon, S., Crabe, P. R. & Herendeen, P. S. 1999 Phylogenetic pattern, diversity, and diversification of eudicots. Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden 86, 1407-1419. (doi:10.2307/2666180)
29. Manos, P. S., Doyle, J. J. & Nixon, K. C. 1999 Phylogeny, biogeography, and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). Mol. Phyl Evol. 12, 333-349. (doi:10.1006/mpev.1999.0614)
30. Mouquet, N. & Loreau, M. 2002 Coexistence in metacommunities: The regional similarity hypothesis. Am. Nat. 159, 420-426. (doi:10.1086/338996)
31. Niinemets, U. 1997 Distribution patterns of foliar carbon and nitrogen as affected by tree dimensions and relative light conditions in the canopy of Picea abies. Trees Struct. Funct. 11, 144-154.
32. Novotny, V. & Basset, Y. 2005 Host specificity of insect herbivores in tropical forests. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 1083-1090. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2004. 3023)
33. Novotny, V., Basset, Y., Miller, S. E., Weiblen, G. D., Bremer, B., Cizek, L. & Drozd, P. 2002 Low beta diversity of herbivorous insects in tropical forests. Nature 448, 692-697. (doi:10.1038/nature06021)
34. Ozanne, C. M. P., Speight, M. R., Hambler, C. & Evans, H. F. 2000 Isolated trees and forest patches: patterns in canopy arthropod abundance and diversity in Pinus sylvestris (Scots Pine). Forest Ecol. Manag. 137, 53-63. (doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00317-5)
35. Parker, I. M. & Gilbert, G. S. 2004 The evolutionary ecology of novel plant-pathogen interactions. Ann. Rev. Ecol Evol. Syst. 35, 675-700. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys. 34.011802.132339)
36. Pericart, J. 1972 Hémiptères Anthocoridae, Cimiddae et Microphysidae de l'Ouest-Paléarctique. Faune de l'Europe et du bassin méditerranéen, vol. 7. Paris, France: Masson et Cie.
37. Pericart, J. 1987 Hémiptères Nabidae d'Europe occidentale et du Maghreb. Faune de France. Paris, France: Fédération française des Sociétés de Sciences Naturelles.
38. Pericart, J. 1998 Hémiptères Lygaeidae euro- méditerranéens. Faune de France. Paris, France: Fédération française des Sociétés de Sciences Naturelles.
39. Poinar, G., Chambers, K. L. & Buckley, R. 2007 Eoepigynia burmensis Gen. and Sp. Nov., an early Cretaceous Eudicot flower (Angiospermae) in Burmese Amber. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 1, 91-96.
40. Pulliam, H. R. 1988 Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132, 652-661. (doi:10.1086/284880)
41. Ritchie, M. E. & Olff, H. 1999 Spatial scaling laws yield a synthetic theory of biodiversity. Nature 400, 557-560. (doi:10.1038/23010)
42. Roland, J. & Taylor, P. D. 1997 Insect parasitoid species respond to forest structure at different spatial scales. Nature 386, 710-713. (doi:10.1038/386710a0)
43. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1995 Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44. Roslin, T., Gripenberg, S., Salminen, J. P., Karonen, M., O'Hara, R., Pihlaja, K. & Pulkkinen, P. 2006 Seeing the trees for the leaves-oaks as mosaics for a host-specific moth. Oikos 113, 106-120. (doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299. 2006.14460.x)
45. Shmida, A. & Wilson, M. V. 1985 Biological determinants of species diversity. J. Biogeogr. 12, 1-20. (doi:10.2307/ 2845026)
46. Singleton, V. L., Orthofer, R. & Lamuela-Raventos, R. M. K. 1999 Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Meth. Ensymol 99, 152-178. (doi:10.1016/ S0076-6879(99)99017-1)
47. Southwood, T. R. E., Wint, G. R. W., Kennedy, C. E. J. & Greenwood, S. R. 2005 The composition of the arthropod fauna of the canopies of some species of oaks (Quercus). Eur. J. Entomol. 102, 65-72.
48. Stichel, W. 1956 Illustrierte Bestimmungstabellen der Wanzen II Europa (Heteroptera-Heteroptera Europae), pp. 169-907. Berlin-Hermsdorf, Berlin: Stichel.
49. Stork, N. E., Adis, J. & Didham, R. K. 1997 Canopy arthropods. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
50. Tilman, D. 1982 Resource competition and community structure. Princeton, USA: Princeton University of Press.
51. Tschamtke, T., Klein, A. M., Kruess, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Thies, C. 2005 Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecol. Lett. 8, 857-874. (doi:10.1111/j. 1461-0248.2005.00782.x)
52. Wachmann, E., Melber, A. & Deckert, J. 2004-2008 Wanzen Band 1. Dipsomorpha, Nepomorpha, Gerromorpha, Leptopodomorpha, Cimicomorpha I. Band 2. Cimicomorpha II. Band 3. Pentatomomorpha I. Band 4. In Pentatomomorpha II. Keltern, Germany: Goecke & Evers.
53. Wagner, E. 1975 Die Miridae Hahn 1831 des Mittelmeerraumes und der Makaronesischen Inseln (Heteroptera, Heteroptera). Entomologische Abhandlungen. Leipzig.
54. Wagner, E. & Weber, H. H. 1964 Hétéroptères Miridae. Faune de France. Paris, France: Fédération Française des Sociétés de Sciences naturelles.
55. Wieser, G., Hecke, K., Tausz, M., Häberle, K. H., Grams, T. E. & Matyssek, R. 2003 The influence of microclimate and tree age on the defense capacity of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) against oxidative stress. Ann. Forest Sci. 60, 31-135. (doi:10.1051/forest:2003005)
56. Wikström, N., Savolainen, V. & Chase, M. W. 2001 Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 2211-2220. (doi:10.1098/ rspb.2001.1782)
57. Wilson, D. S. 1992 Complex interactions in metacommunities, with implications for biodiversity and higher levels of selection. Ecology 73, 1984-2000.