Results of the brugge benchmark study for flooding optimization and history matching

SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 391-405

  Peters, E ^a   Arts, R J ^a   Brouwer, G K ^a   Geel, C R ^a   Cullick, S ^b   Lorentzen, R J ^c   Chen, Y ^d   Dunlop, K N B ^e   Vossepoel, F C ^f   Xu, R ^g   Sarma, P ^h   Alhutali, A H ⁱ   Reynolds, A C ^j  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b HALLIBURTON   (Australia)

^c INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^e Roxar   (Australia)

^f Portfolio and New Business   (United Kingdom)

^g Abingdon Business Park   (United Kingdom)

^h STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF TULSA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLOODS; OIL WELL LOGGING; PETROLEUM RESERVOIRS; RESERVOIRS (WATER); SEISMOLOGY; OIL FIELDS; SECONDARY RECOVERY; WELL LOGGING;

BENCHMARK STUDY; CLOSED-LOOP; FLOODINGS; HISTORY MATCHING; MATCHING METHODS; OPTIMIZATION MATCHING; PRODUCTION DATA; PRODUCTION STRATEGY; THE NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV); WATERFLOODING OPTIMIZATIONS; HISTORY-MATCHED RESERVOIR MODELS; INFLOW CONTROL VALVE; OPTIMIZED PRODUCTION; SYNTHETIC DATASETS; TIME-LAPSE SEISMIC DATA;

OIL WELL FLOODING; PETROLEUM RESERVOIRS;

BENCHMARKING; DATA SET; FLOODING; OIL FIELD; OPTIMIZATION; PERMEABILITY; POROSITY; RESERVOIR; SEISMIC DATA;

NUCLEOPOLYHEDROVIRUS;

EID: 77955383053     PISSN: 10946470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2118/119094-PA     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alhuthali, A., Oyerinde, D., and Datta-Gupta, A. 2007. Optimal Waterflood Management Using Rate Control. SPE Res Eval & Eng 10(5):539-551. SPE-102478-PA. doi: 10.2118/102478-PA.
2. Alhuthali, A. H., Datta-Gupta, A., Yuen, B., and Fontanilia, J. P. 2008. Optimal Rate Control Under Geologic Uncertainty. Paper SPE 113628 presented the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, 20-23 April, doi: 10.2118/113628-MS.
3. Alhuthali, A. H., Datta-Gupta, A., Yuen, B., and Fontanilia, J. P. 2009. Field Applications of Waterflood Optimization via Optimal Rate Control With Smart Wells. Paper SPE 118948 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 2-4 February, doi: 10.2118/118948-MS.
4. Bailey, W. J., Couët, B., and Wilkinson, D. 2005. Field Optimization Tool for Maximizing Asset Value. SPE Res Eng 8(1):7-21. SPE-87026-PA. doi: 10.2118/87026-PA.
5. Bianco, A., Cominelli, A., Dovera, L., Nævdal, G., and Vallès, B. 2007. History Matching and Production Forecast Uncertainty by Means of the Ensemble Kalman Filter: A Real Field Application. Paper SPE 107161 presented at the EAGE/EUROPEC Conference and Exhibition, London, 11-14 June, doi: 10.2118/107161-MS.
6. Bos, C. F. M. 2000. Production Forecasting with Uncertainty Quantification. PUNQ final report, Fault Analysis Group, Dublin, UK.
7. Bos, C. F. M. et al. 1999. Production Forecasting with Uncertainty Quantification: PUNQ-2. TNO Report NITG 99-255-A, Fault Analysis Group, Dublin, UK.
8. Brouwer, D. R. and Jansen, J.-D. 2004. Dynamic Optmization of Water Flooding With Smart Wells Using Optimal Control Theory. SPE J. 9(4):391-102. SPE-78278-PA. doi: 10.2118/78278-PA.
9. Brouwer, D. R., Nævdal, G., Jansen, J.-D., Vefring, E. H., and van Kruijsdijk, C. P. J. W. 2004. Improved Reservoir Management Through Optimal Control and Continuous Model Updating. Paper SPE 90149 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 26-29 September, doi: 10.2118/90149-MS.
10. Chen, Y. and Oliver, D. S. 2009. Ensemble-Based Closed-Loop Production Optimization on Brugge Field. Paper SPE 118962 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 2-4 February, doi: 10.2118/118926-MS.
11. Chen, Y., Oliver, D. S., and Zhang, D. 2008. Efficient Ensemble-Based Closed-Loop Production Optimization. Paper SPE 112873 presented at the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, 21-23 April, doi: 10.2118/112873-MS.
12. Christie, M. A. and Blunt, M. J. 2001. Tenth SPE Comparative Solution Project: A Comparison of Upscaling Techniques. SPE Res Eval & Eng 4(4):308-317. SPE-72469-PA. doi: 10.2118/72469-PA.
13. Cullick, A. S., Johnson, W. D., and Shi, G. 2006. Improved and More Rapid History Matching With a Nonlinear Proxy and Global Optimization. Paper SPE 101933 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 24-27 September, doi: 10.2118/101933-MS.
14. Dunlop, K. N. B., Revus, D. E., and Webb, S. J. 2007. Enabling the "Big Loop"-History matching while ensuring consistency with the geological model. Presented at Production Geoscience 2007 "From Geo to Flow-Dealing with the Bottlenecks", Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, Stavanger, 5-6 November.
15. Evensen, G. 2007. Data Assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
16. Floris, F. J. T., Bush, M. D., Cuypers, M., Roggero, E, and Syversveen, A.-R. 2001. Methods for quantifying the uncertainty of production forecasts: A comparative study. Petroleum Geoscience 7 (Supplement, 1 May): 87-96.
17. Gill, P. E, Murray, W, and Saunders, M. A. 2002. User's Guide for SNOPT 6, A FORTRAN Package for Large Scale Nonlinear Programming. Systems Optimization Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA (December 2002).
18. Gu, Y. and Oliver, D. S. 2007. An Iterative Ensemble Kalman Filter for Multiphase Fluid Flow Data Assimilation. SPE J. 12(4):438-446. SPE-108438-PA. doi: 10.2118/108438-PA.
19. He, Z. and Datta-Gupta, A. 2002. Streamline-Based Production Data Integration With Gravity and Changing Field Conditions. SPE J. 7(4):423-436. SPE-71333-PA. doi: 10.2118/81208-PA.
20. Hooke, R. and Jeeves, T. A. 1961. "Direct Search" Solution of Numerical and Statistical Problems. J. of the ACM 8(2):212-229. doi: 10.1145/321062.321069.
21. Jansen, J. D., Douma, S. D., Brouwer, D. R., Van den Hof, P. M. J., Bosgra, O. H., and Heemink, A. W. 2009. Closed Loop Reservoir Management. Paper SPE 119098 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 2-4 February, doi: 10.2118/119098-MS.
22. Jutila, H. A. and Goodwin, N. H. 2006. Schedule Optimization to Complement Assisted History Matching and Prediction Under Uncertainty. Paper SPE 100253 presented at the SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 12-15 June, doi: 10.2118/100253-MS.
23. Killough, J. E. 1995. Ninth SPE Comparative Solution Project: A Reexamination of Black-Oil Simulation. Paper SPE 29110 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 12-15 February, doi: 10.2118/29110-MS.
24. Kraaijevanger, J. F. B. M., Egberts, P. J. P., Valstar, J. R., and Buurman, H. W. 2007. Optimal Waterflood Design Using the Adjoint Method. Paper SPE 105764 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, 26-28 February, doi: 10.2118/105764-MS.
25. Lorentzen, R. J., Shafieirad, A., and Nævdal, G. 2009. Closed-Loop Reservoir Management Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter and Sequential Quadratic Programming. Paper SPE 119101 presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 2-4 February, doi: 10.2118/119101-MS.
26. Nævdal, G., Johnsen, L. M., Aanonsen, S. I., and Vefring, E. H. 2005. Reservoir Monitoring and Continuous Model Updating Using Ensemble Kalman Filter. SPE J. 10(1):66-74. SPE-84372-PA. doi: 10.2118/84372-PA.
27. Nikolaou, M., Cullick, A. S., and Saputelli, L. 2006. Production Optimization: A Moving-Horizon Approach. Paper SPE 99358 presented at the Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, 11-13 April, doi: 10.2118/99358-MS.
28. Nocedal, J. and Wright, S. J. 1999. Numerical Optimization. New York City: Springer.
29. Sarma, P., Chen, W. H., Durlofsky, L. J., and Aziz, K. 2008. Production Optimization With Adjoint Models Under Nonlinear Control-State Path Inequality Constraints. SPE Res Eval & Eng 11(2):326-339. SPE-99959-PA. doi: 10.2118/99959-PA.
30. Sarma, P., Durlofsky, L. J., Aziz, K., and Chen, W. H. 2006. Efficient real-time reservoir management using adjoint-based optimal control and model updating. Computational Geosciences 10(1):3-36. doi: 10.1007/s 10596-005-9009-z. (Pubitemid 44116389)
31. Schittkowski, K. 1985. NLQPL: A FORTRAN-Subroutine Solving Constrained Nonlinear Programming Problems. Annals of Operations Research 5 (1-4): 485-500.
32. Skjervheim, J.-A., Evensen, G., Aanonsen, S. I., Ruud, B. O., and Johansen, T. A. 2007. Incorporating 4D Seismic Data in Reservoir Simulation Model Using Ensemble Kalman Filter. SPE J. 12(3):282-292. SPE-95789-PA. doi: 10.2118/95789-PA.
33. Vasco, D. W. and Karasaki, K. 2006. Interpretation and inversion of lowfrequency head observations. Water Resources Research 42: W05408. doi: 10.1029/2005 WR004445.
34. Wang, C, Li, G., and Reynolds, A. C. 2007. Production Optimization in Closed-Loop Reservoir Management. Paper SPE 109805 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, USA, 11-14 November, doi: 10.2118/109805-MS.
35. Webb, S. J., Bayless, J. S., and Dunlop, K. N. B. 2007. Enabling the "Big Loop"-Ensuring Consistency of Geological and Reservoir Simulation Models. Presented at the AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Long Beach, California, USA, 1-4 April.