-
1
-
-
5744228472
-
-
10.1016/j.carbon.2004.07.028
-
J. Jiang, R. Saito, A. Grüneis, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, Carbon 42, 3169 (2004). 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.07.028
-
(2004)
Carbon
, vol.42
, pp. 3169
-
-
Jiang, J.1
Saito, R.2
Grüneis, A.3
Dresselhaus, G.4
Dresselhaus, M.S.5
-
2
-
-
77954743958
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevB.80.195422
-
A. Zarifi and T. G. Pedersen, Phys. Rev. B 80, 195422 (2009). 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.195422
-
(2009)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.80
, pp. 195422
-
-
Zarifi, A.1
Pedersen, T.G.2
-
3
-
-
29744464925
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevB.72.195403
-
S. V. Goupalov, Phys. Rev. B 72, 195403 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.72. 195403
-
(2005)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.72
, pp. 195403
-
-
Goupalov, S.V.1
-
5
-
-
77955382101
-
-
In particular, it fails to predict the order of the energy bands.
-
In particular, it fails to predict the order of the energy bands.
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
0013148135
-
-
10.1103/PhysRevB.66.155404
-
E. L. Ivchenko and B. Z. Spivak, Phys. Rev. B 66, 155404 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.155404
-
(2002)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.66
, pp. 155404
-
-
Ivchenko, E.L.1
Spivak, B.Z.2
-
7
-
-
77955362793
-
-
As a consequence of the overlap integral of the tight-binding method being neglected. See Ref..
-
As a consequence of the overlap integral of the tight-binding method being neglected. See Ref..
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
77955406487
-
-
The state with μ=N/2, K2 =0 corresponds to the M point in the reciprocal space of graphene. If the origin in the reciprocal space were moved to this point then the time-reversal operation would relate the electronic states of a carbon nanotube characterized by the opposite two-dimensional k vectors (the electron spin is neglected). For the (4,2) nanotube N=28.
-
The state with μ = N / 2, K 2 = 0 corresponds to the M point in the reciprocal space of graphene. If the origin in the reciprocal space were moved to this point then the time-reversal operation would relate the electronic states of a carbon nanotube characterized by the opposite two-dimensional k vectors (the electron spin is neglected). For the (4,2) nanotube N = 28.
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
77955372985
-
-
As was pointed out in Ref., this is not the case of Fig. 6 in Ref. describing optical transitions in a (10, 10) armchair nanotube.
-
As was pointed out in Ref., this is not the case of Fig. 6 in Ref. describing optical transitions in a (10, 10) armchair nanotube.
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
77955381358
-
-
For μ=11, K2 =π/T one has K1 =11 (5 b1 +4 b2 ) /28, K2 =1/2 (2 b1 -4 b2 ) /28, where b1 and b2 are the reciprocal-lattice vectors of graphene (Ref.). Thus, one has K1 + K2 =2 b1 +3/2 b2, which corresponds to the M point in the reciprocal space of graphene.
-
For μ = 11, K 2 = π / T one has K 1 = 11 (5 b 1 + 4 b 2) / 28, K 2 = 1 / 2 (2 b 1 - 4 b 2) / 28, where b 1 and b 2 are the reciprocal-lattice vectors of graphene (Ref.). Thus, one has K 1 + K 2 = 2 b 1 + 3 / 2 b 2, which corresponds to the M point in the reciprocal space of graphene.
-
-
-
|
