Utility scores for facial disfigurement requiring facial transplantation [Outcomes Article]

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 126, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 443-449

  Sinno, Hani H ^a,b   Thibaudeau, Stephanie ^a   Duggal, Anil ^a   Lessard, Lucie ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MONTREAL CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; CANADA; COHORT ANALYSIS; CRANIOFACIAL MALFORMATION; FACE INJURY; FACIAL TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INJURY SCALE; INTERNET; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERCEPTION; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AGE FACTORS; BODY IMAGE; COHORT STUDIES; CRANIOFACIAL ABNORMALITIES; FACIAL INJURIES; FACIAL TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; INTERNET; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PROBABILITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUEBEC; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955374055     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e094fa     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. The first facial transplant. Lancet 2005;366:1984.
2. Spurgeon B. Surgeons pleased with patient's progress after face transplant. BMJ. 2005;331:1359.
3. Jiang HQ, Wang Y, Hu XB, Li YS, Li JS. Composite tissue allograft transplantation of cephalocervical skin flap and two ears. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:31e-35e; discussion 36e-37e.
4. Barker JH, Furr A, Cunningham M, et al. Investigation of risk acceptance in facial transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118:663-670. (Pubitemid 44318925)
5. Bermudez L. Face transplant: Is it worth it? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1891-1896.
6. Read JL, Quinn RJ, Berwick DM, Fineberg HV, Weinstein MC. Preferences for health outcomes: Comparison of assessment methods. Med Decis Making 1984;4:315-329.
7. Torrance GW, Feeny D. Utilities and quality-adjusted life years. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1989;5:559-575.
8. Kerrigan CL, Collins ED, Kneeland TS, et al. Measuring health state preferences in women with breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:280-288.
9. van Osch SM, Stiggelbout AM. The construction of standard gamble utilities. Health Econ. 2008;17:31-40.
10. Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ. 1986;5:1-30.
11. Stevens KJ, McCabe CJ, Brazier JE. Mapping between Visual Analogue Scale and Standard Gamble data: Results from the UK Health Utilities Index 2 valuation survey. Health Econ. 2006;15:527-533.
12. Chang WT, Collins ED, Kerrigan CL. An Internet-based utility assessment of breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 108:370-377.
13. Llewellyn-Thomas H, Sutherland HJ, Tibshirani R, Ciampi A, Till JE, Boyd NF. Describing health states: Methodologic issues in obtaining values for health states. Med Care 1984; 22:543-552.
14. Boyd NF, Sutherland HJ, Heasman KZ, Tritchler DL, Cummings BJ. Whose utilities for decision analysis? Med Decis Making 1990;10:58-67.
15. McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC Jr, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:1259-1262.
16. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol: A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16:199-208.
17. Nord E. EuroQol: Health-related quality of life measurement. Valuations of health states by the general public in Norway. Health Policy 1991;18:25-36.
18. Nease RF Jr, Tsai R, Hynes LM, Littenberg B. Automated utility assessment of global health. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:175-182.
19. Lenert LA, Morss S, Goldstein MK, Bergen MR, Faustman WO, Garber AM. Measurement of the validity of utility elicitations performed by computerized interview. Med Care 1997;35:915-920.
20. Morris PJ, Bradley JA, Doyal L, et al. Facial transplantation: A working party report from the Royal College of Surgeons of England. Transplantation 2004;77:330-338.
21. Liem YS, Bosch JL, Hunink MG. Preference-based quality of life of patients on renal replacement therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Value Health 2008;11:733-741.
22. Lara AM, Wakholi BN, Kasirye A, et al. Utility assessment of HIV/AIDS-related health states in HIV-infected Ugandans. AIDS 2008;22(Suppl 1):S123-S130.
23. Coffey JT, Brandle M, Zhou H, et al. Valuing healthrelated quality of life in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002;25: 2238-2243.
24. Cugno S, Sprague S, Duku E, Thoma A. Composite tissue allotransplantation of the face: Decision analysis model. Can J Plast Surg. 2007;15:145-152.
25. Weinstein MC, Stason WB. Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. N Engl J Med. 1977;296:716-721.