A utility centered approach for evaluating and optimizing geo-tagging

KDIR 2009 - 1st International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 134-139

  Weichselbraun, Albert ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Geo tagging; GeoNames; Quality assessment; Utility model

Indexed keywords

DESIGN DECISIONS; DOMAIN ONTOLOGIES; ECONOMIC THEORIES; EXTERNAL DATA SOURCES; FINE GRAINED; GEOSPATIAL APPLICATIONS; GOOGLE MAPS; HUBMANN; MULTIPLE DIMENSIONS; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; USER PROFILE; UTILITY MODEL;

CLIMATE CHANGE; ECONOMICS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; ONTOLOGY; OPTIMIZATION;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 77955372865     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Alani, H., Jones, C. B., and Tudhope, D. (2001). Voronoi-based region approximation for geographical information retrieval with gazetteers. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15(4):287-306. (Pubitemid 32554965)
2. Allan, J., Carterette, B., and Lewis, J. (2005). When will information retrieval be "good enough"? In SIGIR '05: Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 433-440, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
3. Amitay, E., Har'El, N., Sivan, R., and Softer, A. (2004). Web-a-where: geotagging web content. In SIGIR '04: Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 273-280, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
4. Clough, P. and Sanderson, M. (2004). A proposal for comparative evaluation of automatic annotation for georeferenced documents. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval at SIGIR 2004.
5. Hersh, W., Turpin, A., Price, S., Chan, B., Kramer, D., Sacherek, L., and Olson, D. (2000). Do batch and user evaluations give the same results? In Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 17-24, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
6. Hubmann-Haidvogel, A., Scharl, A., and Weichselbraun, A. (2009). Multiple coordinated views for searching and navigating web content repositories. Information Sciences, 179(12):1813-1821.
7. Leidner, J. L. (2006). An evaluation dataset for the toponym resolution task. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30:400-417.
8. Martins, B., Silva, M. J., and Chaves, M. S. (2005). Challenges and resources for evaluating geographical ir. In GIR '05: Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Geographic information retrieval, pages 65-69, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
9. Nielsen, J. and Landauer, T. K. (1993). A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 206-213, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ACM.
10. Riekert, W.-F. (2002). Automated retrieval of information in the internet by using thesauri and gazetteers as knowledge sources. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 8(6):581-590.
11. Turpin, A. H. and Hersh, W. (2001). Why batch and user evaluations do not give the same results. In SIGIR '01: Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 225-231, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
12. Turpin, A. H. and Scholer, F. (2006). User performance versus precision measures for simple search tasks. In SIGIR '06: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 11-18, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
13. Warren, D. H. D. and Pereira, F. C. N. (1982). An efficient easily adaptable system for interpreting natural language queries. Computational Linguistics, 8(3-4): 110-122.
14. Weichselbraun, A. (2008). Strategies for optimizing querying third party resources in semantic web applications. In Cordeiro, J., Shishkov, B., Ranchordas, A., and Helfer, M., editors, 3rd International Conference on Software and Data Technologies, pages 111-118, Porto, Portugal.