Group cognitive behavioural therapy for postnatal depression: A systematic review of clinical effectiveness, costeffectiveness and value of information analyses

Health Technology Assessment

Volumn 14, Issue 44, 2010, Pages 1-152

  Stevenson, M D ^a   Scope, A ^a   Sutcliffe, P A ^a   Booth, A ^a   Slade, P ^a   Parry, G ^a   Saxon, D ^a   Kalthenthaler, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT;

CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITIVE THERAPY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; EDINBURGH POSTNATAL DEPRESSION SCALE; FOLLOW UP; GROUP THERAPY; HUMAN; MATERNAL CARE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PSYCHOEDUCATION; PUERPERAL DEPRESSION; PUERPERIUM; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT DURATION;

COGNITIVE THERAPY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION, POSTPARTUM; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PSYCHOTHERAPY, GROUP; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 77955355659     PISSN: 13665278     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3310/hta14440     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Milgrom J, Martin PR, Negri LM. Treating postnatal depression. A psychological approach for health care practitioners. England: Wiley; 1999.
2. Cox JL, Murray D, Chapman G. A controlled study of the onset, duration and prevalence of postnatal depression. Br J Psychiatry 1993;163:27-31.
3. World Health Organization. Tenth revision of the international classification of diseases and related health problems. Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 1992.
4. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition. New York, NY: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
5. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Antenatal and postnatal mental health: clinical management and service guidance (Brief record). London: NICE; 2007.
6. Jomeen J, Martin C. Confirmation of an occluded anxiety component within the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during early pregnancy. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2005;23:143-54.
7. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Scottish Executive Health Department, Department of Health, and Social Services and Public Safety, Northern Ireland. Why mothers die 1997-1999. The fifth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. London: RCOG Press; 2001.
8. Cooper P, Murray L. Course and recurrence of postnatal depression: Evidence for the specificity of the diagnostic concept. Br J Psychiatry 1995;166:191-5.
9. Cooper PJ, Murray L. Postnatal depression. BMJ 1998;316:1884-6.
10. Beck C. Predictors of postpartum depression: An update. Nurs Res 2001;50:275-85.
11. Robertson E, Grace S, Wallington T, Stewart D. Antenatal risk factors for postpartum depression: a synthesis of recent literature. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2004;26:289-95.
12. Morrell CJ, Slade P, Warner R, Paley G, Dixon S, Walters SJ, et al. Clincial effectiveness of health visitor training in psychologically informed approaches for depression in postnatal women: pragmatic cluster randomised trial in primary care. BMJ 2009;338:1-10.
13. Morrell CJ, Warner R, Slade P, Dixon S, Walters S, Paley G, et al. Psychological interventions for postnatal depression: Cluster randomised trial and economic evaluation. The PoNDER trial. Health Technol Assess 2009;13(30).
14. Gaynes BN, Gavin N, Meltzer-Brody S, Lohr KN, Swinson T, Gartlehner G, et al. Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 2005:1-8.
15. O'Hara MW, Swain AM. Rates and risk of postpartum depression-a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry 1996;8:37-54.
16. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck Depression Inventory Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1996.
17. Wieck A, Kumar R, Hirst AD, Marks MN, Campbell IC, Checkley SA. Increased sensitivity of dopamine receptors and recurrence of affective psychosis after childbirth. BMJ 1991;303:613-16.
18. Beck CT. Postpartum depression: it isn't just the blues. Am J Nurs 2006;106:40-50.
19. Kendell RE, Chalmers JC, Platz C. Epidemiology of puerperal psychoses. Br J Psychiatry 1987;150:662-73. [Erratum published in Br J Psychiatry 1987;151:135.]
20. O'Hara M. The nature of postpartum depressive disorders. In Murray L, Cooper P, editors. Postpartum depression and child development. New York, NY: Guildford; 1997: 3-31.
21. Beck C. A meta-analysis of predictors of postpartum depression. Nurs Res 1996;45:297-303.
22. O'Hara M, Schlechte J, Lewis D, Wright E. Prospective study of postpartum blues: Biologic and psychosocial factors. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991;48:801-6.
23. Cooper P, Murray L, Hooper R, West A. The development and validation of a predictive index for postpartum depression. Psychol Med 1996;26:627-34.
24. Murray L, Cooper P. The impact of postpartum depression on child development. Int Rev Psychiatry 1996;8:55-63.
25. Murray L. The impact of postnatal depression on infant development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1992;33:543-61.
26. Hay D, Pawlby S, Sharp D, Asten P, Mills A, Kumar R. Intellectual problems shown by 11-year-old children whose mothers had postnatal depression. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2001;42:871-89.
27. Carter A, Garrity R, Chazan C, Little C, Briggs G. Maternal depression and comorbidity: Predicting early parenting, attachment security, and toddler social-emotional problems and competencies. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2001;40:18-26.
28. Campbell SB, Cohn JF, Meyers T. Depression in first-time mothers - mother-infant interaction and depression chronicity. Dev Psychol 1995;31:349-57.
29. Escribe-Aguir V, Gonzalez-Galarzo MC, Barona-Vilar C, Artazcoz L. Factors related to depression during pregnancy: are there gender differences? J Epidemiol Community Health 2008;62:410-14.
30. Areias MEG, Kumar R, Barros H, Figueiredo E. Correlates of postnatal depression in mothers and fathers. Br J Psychiatry 1996;169:36-41.
31. Healthcare Commission towards better births. A review of maternity services in England. Service Review. London: Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection; 2008.
32. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Antenatal and postnatal mental health: Clinical management and service guidance. 2006. URL: www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/APMHConsFullGuideline.pdf (accessed 1 April 2009).
33. Appleby L, Warner R, Whitton AF, Faragher B. A controlled study of fluxetine and cognitivebehavioral counselling in the treatment of postnatal depression. BMJ 1997;314:932-6.
34. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Commissioning antenatal and postnatal mental health services. 2007. URL: www.nice.org.uk/usingguidance/commissioningguides/apmh.jsp (accessed 1 April 2009).
35. Family & Parenting Institute. Health visitors: A progress report. 2009. URL: www.familyandparenting.org/Filestore//Documents/Our_work/Campaigns/HealthVisitors_a_progress_report.pdf (accessed 1 April 2009).
36. Dennis CL, Chung-Lee L. Postpartum depression help-seeking barriers and maternal treatment preferences: a qualitative systematic review. Birth 2006;33:323-31.
37. Royal College of Psychiatrists. Perinatal Maternal Mental Health Services. Council Report CR88. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2000.
38. Curtis L. Unit costs of health and social care. Canterbury: University of Kent; 2007.
39. Department of Health. Treatment choice in psychological therapies and counselling. Evidence based clinical practice guideline. London: DoH; 2001.
40. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Depression (amended). Management of Depression in primary and secondary care. NICE Clinical Guideline 23 (amended). London: NICE; 2007.
41. Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Andersson G, van Oppen P. Psychotherapy for depression in adults: A meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. J Consult Clin Psychol 2008;76:909-22.
42. Dennis CL, Hodnett E. Psychosocial and psychological interventions for treating postpartum depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;CD006116.
43. Honey KLB. A brief psycho-educational group intervention for postnatal depression. Br J Clin Psychol 2002;41:405-9.
44. Ades AE, Cliffe S. Markov Chain Monte Carlo estimation of a multi-parameter decision model: consistency of evidence and the accurate assessment of uncertainty. Med Decis Making 2002;22:359-71.
45. Fenwick E, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Health Econ 2001;10:779-87.
46. Claxton K, Posnett J. An economic approach to clinical trial design and research priority-setting. Health Econ 1996;5:513-24.
47. Ades AE, Lu G, Claxton K. Expected values of sample information calculation in medical decision making. Med Decis Making 2004;24:207-27.
48. Felli JC, Hazen JB. Sensitivity analysis and the expected value of perfect information. Med Decis Making 1998;18:95-109.
49. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression: Development of the 10- item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 1987;150:782-6.
50. Beck AT, Steer RA. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1993.
51. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. University of York, York: CRD; 2009.
52. Davies S, Jasper M. A first-stage evaluation of a group programme for PND. Community Pract 2004;77:426-33.
53. Morgan M, Matthey S, Barnett B, Richardson C. A group programme for postnatally distressed women and their partners. J Adv Nurs 1997;26:913-20.
54. Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, et al. Evaluating nonrandomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 2003;7(27).
55. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodolgical quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:377-84.
56. National CASP collaboration for qualitative methodologies. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) making sense of evidence. 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research. England: Public Health Resource Unit; 2006.
57. Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.; 2007.
58. Rojas G, Fritsch R, Solis J, Jadresic E, Castillo C, González M, et al. Treatment of postnatal depression in low-income mothers in primary-care clinics in Santiago, Chile: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007;370:1629-37.
59. Milgrom J, Negri LM, Gemmill AW, McNeil M, Martin PR. A randomized controlled trial of psychological interventions for postnatal depression. Br J Clin Psychol 2005;44:529-42.
60. Highet N, Drummond P. A comparative evaluation of community treatments for postpartum depression: implications for treatment and management practices. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2004;38:212-18.
61. Clark R, Tluczek A, Wenzel A. Psychotherapy for postpartum depression: a preliminary report. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2003;73:441-54.
62. Meager I, Milgrom J. Group treatment for postpartum depression: A pilot study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1996;30:852-60.
63. Wampold BE, Brown GS. Estimating variability in outcomes attributable to therapists: A naturalistic study of outcomes in managed care. J Consult Clin Psychol 2005;73:914-23.
64. Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res 1998;8:341-51.
65. Duskin C. Experiences of social comparison in a postpartum depression support group. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 2006;67:539.
66. Beck C. Teetering on the edge: A substantive theory of postpartum depression. Nurs Res 1993;42:42-8.
67. Pitts F. Professional. Health visiting: the Monday group: postnatal depression revisited. Community Pract 1999;72:327-9.
68. Eastwood P. Group work 1. Promoting peer group support with postnatally depressed women. Health Visit 1995;68:148-50.
69. Najavits LM, Weiss RD. Variations in therapist effectiveness in the treatment of patients with substance use disorders: An empirical review. Addiction 1994;89:679-88.
70. Drummond MF, Jefferson TO. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. BMJ 1996;313:275-83.
71. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guide to the methods of technology appraisals. 2008. URL: www.nice.org.uk/media/B52/A7/TAMethodsGuideUpdatedJune2008.pdf (accessed 1 April 2009).
72. Brazier JE, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-J Health Econ 2002;21:271-92.
73. Briggs A, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
74. Claxton K, Sculpher M, McCabe C, Briggs A, Akehurst R, Buxton M. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: not an optional extra. Health Econ 2005;14:339-47.
75. Stinnett A, Mulahy J. Net health benefits: a new framework for the analysis of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analyses. Med Decis Making 1998;18:S68-S80.
76. Office for National Statistics. Births and deaths. London: Office for National Statistics; 2004.
77. Schafer JL. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman and Hall; 1997.
78. Schafer JL. Multiple imputation: a primer. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:3-15.
79. Tanner BA. A multidimensional client satisfaction instrument. Eval Program Plann 1982;5:161-7.