Athlete and coach perceptions of technology needs for evaluating running performance

Sports Engineering

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-18

  Fleming, Paul ^a   Young, Colin ^b   Dixon, Sharon ^c   Carré, Matt ^d  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Sports and Play Construction Association (SAPCA)   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Gait analysis; Instrumentation; Perceptions; Running performance

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES; CONTROLLED LABORATORIES; CURRENT TECHNOLOGY; DIRECT METHOD; EXPERT ADVICE; FORCE PLATE; GPS TRACKING; GRAPHICAL PLOTS; HIGH-SPEED VIDEO; INDIRECT METHODS; INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY; INSTRUMENTATION; MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGIES; PERCEPTIONS; PRESSURE SYSTEM; QUALITATIVE DATA; QUANTITATIVE DATA; RELATIONSHIP MODEL; RUNNING PERFORMANCE; SMALL AREA; SUPPORT STAFF;

ACCELEROMETERS; COMPETITION; GAIT ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENTS; RATING; SURVEYS; TECHNOLOGY;

INNOVATION;

EID: 77955355085     PISSN: 13697072     EISSN: 14602687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12283-010-0049-9     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Billing DC, Nagarajah CR, Hayes JP, Baker J (2006) Predicting ground reaction forces in running using micro-sensors and neural networks. Sports Eng 9: 15-27.
2. Cohen L, Manion L (1980) Research methods in education. Routledge, London.
3. De Cock A, de Clercq D, Willems T, Witrouvuw E (2005) Temporal characteristics of foot roll-over during barefoot jogging: reference data for young adults. Gait Posture 21: 432-439.
4. De Cock A, Willems T, Witrouvuw E, Varenterghem J, de Clercq D (2006) A functional foot type classification with cluster analysis based on plantar pressure distribution during jogging. Gait Posture 23: 339-347.
5. De Cock A, Willems T, Witrouvuw E, Varenterghem J, de Clercq D (2008) The trajectory of the centre of pressure during barefoot running as a potential measure for foot function. Gait Posture 27: 669-675.
6. Dixon SJ (2006) Application of centre of pressure data to indicate rearfoot inversion-eversion in shod running. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 96: 305-312.
7. Fleming PR, Young C, Dixon N, Roberts JR, Jones R (2005) Human perceptions of artificial surfaces for field hockey. Sports Eng 8(3): 121-136.
8. Hay JG, Reid JG (1988) Anatomy, mechanics, and human motion, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
9. Heller B, Haake SJ, Kirtley C (2004) An instrumented insole for measurement of foot motion. In: Hubbard M (ed) The engineering of sport 5: proceedings of the 5th international conference on the engineering of sport, vol 2, pp 201-206. ISEA, Sheffield, UK, ISBN 0-9547861-2-2.
10. Hocknell A, Jones R, Rothberg SJ (1996). Engineering 'feel' in the design of golf clubs. In: Haake SJ (ed) The engineering of sport: proceedings of the 1st international conference on the engineering of sport, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 333-337.
11. Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage, London.
12. Putti AB, Arnold GP, Cochrane L, Abboud RJ (2007) The Pedar in-shoe system: repeatability and normal pressure values. Gait Posture 25(3): 401-405.
13. Roberts JR, Jones R, Harwood C, Mitchell S, Rothberg S (2001) Human perceptions of sports equipment under playing conditions. J Sports Sci 19: 485-497.
14. Scanlan TK, Ravizza K, Stein GL (1989) An in depth study of former elite figure skaters: I. Introduction to the project. J Sport Exerc Psychol 11: 54-64.
15. Scanlan TK, Stein GL, Ravizza K (1989) An in depth study of former elite figure skaters: II. Sources of enjoyment. J Sport Exerc Psychol 11: 65-83.