Multi-environment model estimation for motility analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 7, 2010, Pages

  Sznitman, Raphael ^a   Gupta, Manaswi ^a   Hager, Gregory D ^a   Arratia, Paulo E ^b   Sznitman, Josué ^c  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c Princeton University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CELL MOTILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERNEL METHOD; LOCOMOTION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MULTI ENVIRONMENT MODEL ESTIMATION; NONHUMAN; PARASITE EXAMINATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; PHYSIOLOGY;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; NEMATODA;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; LOCOMOTION; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 77955354466     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011631     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Brenner S (1974) The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77: 71-94.
2. Rankin CH (2002) From gene to indentified neuron to behaviour in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature Rev Genetics 3: 622-630.
3. Link EM, Hardiman G, Sluder AE, Johnson CD, Liu LX (2000) Therapeutic target discovery using Caenorhabditis elegans. Pharmacogenomics 1: 203-217.
4. Jorgensen EM, Mango SE (2002) The art and design of genetic screens: Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature Rev Genetics 3: 356-369.
5. Chamberlain JS, Benian GM (2000) Muscular dystrophy: the worm turns to genetic disease. Curr Biol 10: 795-797.
6. Silverman GA, Luke CJ, Bhatia SR, Long OS, Vetica AC, et al. (2009) Modeling molecular and cellular aspects of human disease using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Pediatr Res 65: 10-18.
7. Sulston JE, Horvitz HR (1977) Post-embryonic cell lineages of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 56: 110-156.
8. Sulston JE, Schierenberg E, White JG, Thomson JN (1983) The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 100: 64-119.
9. White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S (1986) The structure of the nervous system of the nematode C. elegans. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 314: 1-340.
10. CES Consortium (1998) Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biolog. Science 282: 2012-2018.
11. Karbowski J, Cronin CJ, Seah A, Mendel JE, Cleary D, et al. (2006) Conservation rules, their breakdown, and optimality in Caenorhabditis sinusoidal locomotion. J Theor Biol 242: 652-669.
12. Pierce-Shimomura JT, Morse TM, Lockery SR (1999) The fundamental role of pirouettes in Caenorhabditis elegans chemotaxis. J Neurosci 19: 9557-9569.
13. Pierce-Shimomura JT, Chen BL, Mun JJ, Ho R, Sarkis R, et al. (2008) Genetic analysis of crawling and swimming locomotory patterns in C. elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 20982-20987.
14. Tavernarakis N, Shreffler W, Wang S, Driscoll M (1997) unc-8, a deg/enac family member, encodes a subunit of a candidate mechanically gated channel that modulates C. elegans locomotion. Neuron 18: 107-119.
15. Berri S, Boyle JH, Tassieri M, Hope IA, Cohen N (2009) Forward locomotion of the nematode C. elegans is achieved through modulation of a single gait. HFSP J 3: 186-193.
16. Korta J, Clark DA, Gabel CV, Mahadevan L, Samuel ADT (2007) Mechanosensation and mechanical load modulate the locomotory gait of swimming C. elegans. J Exp Biol 210: 2383-2389.
17. Ghosh R, Emmons SW (2008) Episodic swimming behavior in the nematode C. elegans. J Exp Biol 211: 3703-3711.
18. Sznitman J, Purohit PK, Krajacic P, Lamitina T, Arratia PE (2010) Material properties of Caenorhabditis elegans swimming at low Reynolds number. Biophys J 98: 617-626.
19. Sznitman J, Shen X, Purohit PK, Arratia PE (2010) The effects of fluid viscosity on the kinematics and material properties of C. elegans swimming at low Reynolds number. Exp Mech DOI 10.1007/s11340-010-9339-1.
20. Chronis N, Zimmer M, Bargmann CI (2007) Microfluidics for in vivo imaging of neuronal and behavioral activity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature Methods 4: 727-731.
21. Lockery SR, Lawton KJ, Doll JC, Faumont S, Couthard SM, et al. (2008) Artificial dirt: microfluidic substrates for nematode neurobiology. J Neurophysiol 99: 3136-3143.
22. Park S, Hwang H, Nam SW, Martinez F, Austin RH, et al. (2008) Enhanced Caenorhabditis elegans locomotion in a structured microfluidic environment. PLOS One 3: e2550.
23. Qin J, Wheeler AR (2007) Maze exploration and learning in C. elegans. Lab Chip 7: 186-192.
24. Rhode CB, Zeng F, Gonzalesz-Rubio R, Angel M, Yanik MF (2007) Microfluidic system for on-chip high-throughput whole-animal sorting and screening at subcellular resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 13891-13895.
25. Shi W, Qin J, Ye N, Lin B (2008) Droplet-based microfluidic system for individual Caenorhabditis elegans assay. Lab Chip 8: 1432-1435.
26. Bessou C, Giugia JB, Franks CJ, Holden-Dye L, Segalat L (1998) Mutations in the Caenorhabditis elegans dystrophin-like gene dys-1 lead to hyperactivity and suggest a link with cholinergic transmission. Neurogenetics 2: 61-72.
27. Baek JH, Cosman P, Feng Z, Silver J, Schafer WR (2002) Using machine vision to analyze and classify Caenorhabditis elegans behavioral phenotypes quantitatively. J Neurosci Meth 118: 9-21.
28. Buckingham SD, Sattelle DB (2008) Strategies for automated analysis of C. elegans locomotion. Invert Neurosci 8: 121-131.
29. Buckingham SD, Sattelle DB (2009) Fast, automated measurement of nematode swimming (thrashing) without morphometry. BMC Neuroscience 10: 84.
30. Cronin CJ, Mendel JE, Mukhtar S, Kim YM, Stirb RC, et al. (2005) An automated system for measuring parameters of nematode sinusoidal movement. BMC Genetics 6: 5.
31. Feng Z, Cronin CJ, Wittig JH, Sternberg PW, Schafer WR (2004) An imaging system for standardized quantitative analysis of C. elegans behavior. BMC Bioinformatics 5: 115.
32. Geng W, Cosman P, Berry CC, Feng Z, Schafer WR (2004) Automatic tracking, feature extraction and classification of C. elegans phenotypes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51: 1811-1820.
33. Huang KM, Cosman P, Schafer WR (2006) Machine vision based detection of omega bends and reversals in C. elegans. J Neurosc Meth 158: 323-336.
34. Huang KM, Cosman P, Schafer WR (2008) Automated detection and analysis of foraging behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosc Meth 171: 153-164.
35. Hoshi K, Shingai R (2006) Computer-driven automatic identification of locomotion states in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neuro Meth 157: 355-363.
36. Tsibidis GD, Tavernarakis N (2007) Nemo: a computational tool for anayzing nematode locomotion. BMC Neuroscience 8: 86.
37. Ramot D, Johnson BE, Berry TL, Carnell L, Goodman MB (2008) The parallel worm tracker: a platform for measuring average speed and drug-induced paralysis in nematodes. PLOS One 3: e2208.
38. Roussel N, Morton CA, Finger FP, Roysam B (2007) A computational model for C. elegans locomotory behavior: application to multiworm tracking. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54: 1786-1797.
39. Tsechpenakis G, Bianchi L, Metaxas DN, Driscoll M (2008) A novel computational approach for simultaneous tracking and feature extraction of C. elegans populations in fluid environments. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55: 1539-1549.
40. Geng W, Cosman P, Baek JH, Berry CC, Schafer WR (2003) Quantitative classification and natural clustering of Caenorhabditis elegans behavioral phenotypes. Genetics 165: 1117-1126.
41. Huang KM, Cosman P, Schafer WR (2009) Using articulated models for tracking multiple C. elegans in physical contact. J Sign Process Syst 55: 113-126.
42. Stauffer C, Grimson W (1999) Adaptive background mixture models for realtime tracking. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp 246-252.
43. Piccardi M (2004) Background subtraction techniques: a review. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. pp 3099-3104.
44. Sznitman R, Lin H, Gupta M, Hager G (2009) Active background modeling: Actors on a stage. In: IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision, Workshop on Visual Surveillance. pp 1222-1228.
45. Fleuret F, Blanchard G (2005) Pattern recognition from one example by chopping. In: Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems conference (NIPS). pp 371-378.
46. Fei-Fei L, Fergus R, Perona P (2006) One-shot learning of object categories. IEEE Trans Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 28: 594-611.
47. Laird NM, Rubin DB, Dempster AP (1997) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. J Roy Stat Soc B 39: 1-38.
48. Kalman RE (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. ASME J Basic Eng 82: 35-45.
49. Isard M, Blake A (1998) CONDENSATION-conditional density propagation for visual tracking. Int J Comp Vis 29: 5-28.
50. Sznitman R, Jedynak B (2010) Active testing for face detection and localization. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 99: in press.
51. Barrow HG, Tenenbaum JM, Bolles RC, Wolf HC (1977) Parametric correspondence and chamfer matching: Two new techniques for image matching. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. pp 659-663.
52. Gavrila DM (2007) A bayesian, exemplar-based approach to hierarchical shape matching. IEEE Trans on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 29: 1408-1421.
53. Dublin-Thaler BJ, Hofman JM, Cai Y, Xenias H, Spielman I, et al. (2008) Quantification of cell edge velocities and traction forces reveals distinct motility modules during cell spreading. PLOS One 3: e3735.
54. Li K, Chen M, Kanade T, Miller ED, Weiss LE, et al. (2008) Cell population tracking and lineage construction with spatiotemporal context. Med Image Anal 12: 546-566.
55. Xiong G, Feng C, Ji L (2006) Dynamical Gaussian mixture model for tracking elliptical living objects. Patt Rec Lett 27: 838-842.