Web services domain knowledge with an ontology on software quality standards

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Internet Technologies and Applications, ITA 09

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 74-85

  Losavio, F ^a   Matteo, A ^a   Levy, N ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL DE VENEZUELA   (Venezuela)

^b LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

Architecture centric design; Domain knowledge; Ontology; Software quality; Web services domain

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTION LEVEL; BUSINESS PROCESS; DESIGN METHOD; DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; QUALITY PROPERTIES; REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE; SERVICES COMPOSITION; SOFTWARE PRODUCT QUALITY; SOFTWARE QUALITY; WEB-SERVICES DOMAIN;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; INTERNET; ONTOLOGY; QUALITY CONTROL; TERMINOLOGY;

WEB SERVICES;

EID: 77955347832     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Abran, A., Moore, J., Bourque, P., Dupuis, R.L. & Tripp, L. (2003) Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge - SWEBOK, Trial Version 1.0, IEEE-Computer Society Press, May 2003, URL: http://www.swebok.org
2. [ANSI/IEEE, 1998] ANSI/IEEE STD 1061, IEEE Standard for a Software Quality Metrics Methodology, IEEE Computer Society Press, New York 1998
3. Berard E. (1992) "Essays in Object-Oriented Software Engineering", Prentice Hall
4. Bosch, J., Svahnberg, M. & van Gurp, J. (2005) A Taxonomy of Variability Realization Techniques, Software Practice and Experience, vol 35(8), 1-50
5. De Champeaux D., D. Lea, & P. Faure. (1993). "Object-Oriented System Development", Addison-Wesley
6. Dobson, G., Hall, S. and Kotonya, G. (2007) "A Domain-Independent Ontology for Non Functional Requirements", Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE 07), 563-566
7. Evesti, A. (2007) Quality-oriented software architecture development. ISBN 978-951-38-7011-9 (URL: http://www.vtt.fi/publications/index.jsp) Copyright © VTT Technical Research Centre of Finlan
8. Gruber. T. R. (1993) A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199-220
9. Horridge M., Knublauch H., Rector A., Stevens R. & Wroe C. (2004) A Practical Guide to Building OWL Ontologies Using the Protégé-OWL Plugin and CO-ODE Tools, Edition 1.0. University of Manchester. URL: http://www.coode.org/resources/tutorials/ProtegeOWLTutorial.pdf
10. Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology 610.12-1990, (1999) Vol.1. Los Alamitos, IEEE Press
11. ISO/IEC 13236. Quality of Service: Framework. Version 1. (1999). International Organisation for Standardisation / International Electrotechnical Commission
12. ISO/IEC 9126-1, 2 "Quality characteristics and guidelines for their use (1, 2), (2001). International Organisation for Standardisation / International Electrotechnical Commission
13. Jean, S., Aït-Ameur, Y. & Pierra, G. (2006) Querying ontology based databases. The OntoQL proposal, proc. of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE2006), San Francisco Bay, USA, July 5-7, 2006
14. Lamanna, D., Skene, J. & Emmerich, W. (2003) "SLAng: a language fir Refining Service Level Agreements", In proc. 9th IEEE Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems, San Juan Puerto Rico, May 2003
15. Losavio, F., Matteo, A. & Rahamut, R. (2008) Web Services Domain Analysis Based on Quality Standards. ECSA 2008: LNCS, Vol. 5292, 354-358.
16. Matinlassi, M. (2004) "Comparison of Software Product Line Architecture Design Methods: COPA, FAST, FORM, KobrA and QADA" Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'04), 0270-5257/04, IEEE
17. Moreira, A., Araujo, J. & Brito I. (2002) "Crosscutting Quality Attributes for Requirements Engineering", SEKE, pp. 167-174
18. Thomas Manes. A. "Web Services. A Manager's Guide". (2003). Addison Wesley.
19. Wirsing. M. (2006) Software Intensive Systems, Report of the Horizon Thematic Group 6, draft, ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/ist/docs/fet/strat-6.pdf
20. World Wide Web Consortium. Web Services Description Requirements. W3C Working Draft 28 October (2002). Copyright © 2002 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio). http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-desc-reqs
21. World Wide Web Consortium. Web Services Architecture Requirements. W3C Working Group Note 11 February (2004). Copyright © 2004 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio). http://www.w3.org/TR/wsa-reqs
22. World Wide Web Consortium. Web Service Modeling Ontology. W3C Member Submission 3 June 2005. W3C Working Draft 28 October (2002). Copyright © 2005 W3C®. http://www.w3.org/Submission/WSMO/
23. World Wide Web Consortium, SPARQL Query Language for RDF, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
24. http://www.ercim.org/publication/Ercim-News/enw64/bth6.html, ERCIM News, Online Edition, Thematic Group 6 on Software Intensive Systems January 2006
25. Sack, P.M.O.O., Bouneffa, M., Maweed, Y. & Basson, H. (2006) On Building an Integrated and Generic Platform for Software Quality Evaluation, Information and Communication Technologies, 2006. ICTTA '06. 2nd