Statistical models to standardize catch rates in the multi-species trawl fishery for Patagonian grenadier (Macruronus magellanicus) off Southern Chile

Fisheries Research

Volumn 105, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 200-214

  Tascheri, R ^a   Saavedra Nievas, J C ^b,c   Roa Ureta, R ^d  

^a INSTITUTO DE FOMENTO PESQUERO   (Chile)

^b IFOP   (Chile)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES   (Chile)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CONCEPCIÓN   (Chile)

Author keywords

Chile; Compound Poisson; CPUE; GLM; GLMM; Macruronus magellanicus; Multi species; Standardization; Targeting behavior; Tweedie; Zero catch records

Indexed keywords

MACRURONUS MAGELLANICUS;

EID: 77955334169     PISSN: 01657836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2010.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Aguayo M. Biology and fisheries of Chilean hakes M. gayi and M. australis. Hake Fisheries, Ecology and Markets 1995, 478. Chapman y Hall. J. Alheit, T. Pitcher (Eds.).
2. Aires-da-Silva A.M., Hoey J.J., Gallucci V.F. A historical index of abundance for the blue shark (Prionace glauca) in the western North Atlantic. Fish. Res. 2008, 92:41-52.
3. Anon, 1981. Report of the Ad-Hoc Working Group on the Use of Effort Data in Assessments. ICES CM 1981/G, 5, 65 pp.
4. Arab L., Wildhaber M.L., Wikle C.K., Gentry C.N. Zero-inflated modeling of fish catch per unit area resulting from multiple gears: applicationto channel carfish and shovelnose sturgeon in the Missouri river. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 2008, 28:1044-1058.
5. Ballara, S.L., Phillips, N.L., Smith, M.H., Dunn, A., 2006. Descriptive analysis of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae) fisheries on the west coast South Island, Cook Strait, Chatham Rise, and sub-Antarctic, and catch per unit effort analysis of the Chatham Rise hoki fishery for the years 1990 to 2003. New Zealand Fisheries Report 2006/19 July 2006. ISSN 1175-1584, p. 53.
6. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Dai, B., 2008. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-28.
7. Bezzi S.I. Aspectos biológico-pesqueros de la merluza de cola del Atlántico sudoccidental. Revista de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero 1984, 4:61-80.
8. Biseau A. Definition of directed fishing effort in a mixed species trawl fishery, and its impacts on stock assessments. Aquat. Living Resour. 1998, 11(3):119-136.
9. Bishop J., Venables W.N., Wang Y.-G. Analysing commercial catch and effort data from a Penaid trawl fishery. A comparison of linear models, mixed models, and generalized estimating equations approaches. Fish. Res. 2004, 70:179-193.
10. Bishop J., Venables W.N., Discmont C.M., Sterling D.J. Standardizing catch rates: is logbook information by itself enough?. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2008, 65:255-266.
11. Bishop J. Standardizing fishery-dependent match and effort data in complex fisheries with technology change. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2006, 16:21-38.
12. Bull, B., 2000. An acoustic study of the vertical distribution of hoki on the Chatham Rise. New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 2000/5, p. 60.
13. Campbell R.A. CPUE standardization and the construction of indices of stock abundance in a spatially varying fishery using general linear models. Fish. Res. 2004, 70:209-227.
14. Camus P. Biogeografía marina de Chile continental. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 2001, 74:587-617.
15. Canales, C., Gálvez, P., Montenegro, C., 2007. Investigación evalaución de stock y CTP merluza común, 2008. Instituto de Fomento Pesquero-Subsecretaría de Pesca, p. 76 (In spanish; request a copy at ). http://www.subpesca.cl/.
16. Canales, C., Gálvez, P., Escobar, V., Tascheri, R., Céspedes, R., Quiroz, J.C., 2008. Investigación evaluación de stock y CTP regionalizada merluza de cola, 2008. Instituto de Fomento Pesquero-Subsecretaría de Pesca, p. 69. (In spanish; request a copy at ). http://www.subpesca.cl/.
17. Candy, S., 2004. Modelling catch and effort data using generalised linear models, the Tweedie distribution, and random vessel effects: longline fishery for Dissostichus eleginoides in CCAMLR Area 48.3. CCAMLR document WG-FSA SAM-03/12, p. 36.
18. Cooke J.G., Lankester K. Consideration of statistical models for catch-effort indices for use in tuning VPAs. ICCAT Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. 1996, 45(2):125-131.
19. Cheung W., Pitcher T.J. Evaluating the status of exploited taxa in the northern South China Sea using instrinsic vulnerability and spatially explicit catch per unit effort data. Fish. Res. 2008, 92:28-40.
20. Dick E.J. Beyond 'lognormal versus gamma': discrimination among error distributions for generalized linear models. Fish. Res. 2004, 70:351-366.
21. Dunn, P.K., 2009a. Tweedie: Tweedie exponential family models. R package version 1.6.2.
22. Dunn P.K. Improving comparisons between models for CPUE. Fish. Res. 2009, 97:148-149.
23. Dunn P.K., Smyth G.K. Randomized quantile residuals. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 1996, 5:236-244.
24. Dunn, A., Livingston, M.E., 2004. Updated catch-per-unit-effort indices fir hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae) on the west coast South Island, Cook Strait, Chatham Rise, and sub-Antarctic for the years 1990 to 2001. New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 2002/47, p. 51.
25. Dunn P.K., Smyth G.K. Series evaluation of Tweedie exponential dispersion model densities. Stat. Comput. 2005, 15:267-280.
26. Dunn P.K., Smyth G.K. Evaluation of Tweedie exponential dispersion model densities by Fourier inversion. Stat. Comput. 2008, 18(1):73-86.
27. Draper N.R., Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis 1998, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, p. 697. 3rd ed.
28. Ernst, B., Aedo, G., Roa, R., Cubillos, L., Rubilar, P., Zuleta, A., Castro, L., Landaeta, M., 2005. Evaluación del reclutamiento de merluza de cola entre la V y X regiones: revisión metodológica. Informe Final. FIP 2004-12. Fondo de Investigación Pesquera. Universidad de Concepción. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas. Departamento de Oceanografía, p. 270 (In spanish). http://www.fip.cl/proyectos/2004/2004-12.htm.
29. FAO, 1999. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 1998. Rome, ISBN 92-5-104187-3, p. 114.
30. Glazer J.P., Butterworth D.S. GLM-based standardization of the catch per unit effort series for south African west coast hake, focusing on adjustments for targeting other species. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 2002, 24:323-339.
31. Goñi R., Alvarez F., Adlerstein S. Application of generalized linear modeling to catch rate analysis of Western Mediterranean fisheries: the Castellón trawl fleet as a case a study. Fish. Res. 1999, 42:291-302.
32. Guisan A., Zimmermann N.E. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 2000, 135:147-186.
33. Gulland J.A. On the fishing effort in English demersal fisheries. Fish. Invest. (Series 2) 1956, 20(5):41.
34. Hilborn R., Walters C. Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment, Choice, Dynamics and Uncertainty 1992, Chapman and Hall, NY, p. 570.
35. Hinton M., Maunder M. Methods for standardizing cpue and how to select among them. Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 2004, 56(1):169-177.
36. Jørgensen, B., 1997. The Theory of Dispersion Models. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, p. 231.
37. Kimura D. Standardize measures of relative abundance based on modeling log(cpue) and their application to Pacific ocean perch (Sebastes alutus). J. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer. 1981, 39:211-218.
38. Krzanowski W.J. An Introduction to Statistical Modeling 1998, Arnold Publishers, p. 252.
39. Kulka D.W., Pinhorn A.T., Halliday R.G., Pitcher D., Stansbury D. Accounting for changes in spatial distribution of groundfish when estimating abundance from commercial fishing data. Fish. Res. 1996, 28:321-342.
40. Large P.A. Use of a multiplicative model to estimate relative abundante from comercial CPUE data. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 1992, 49:253-261.
41. Lewin-Koh, N.J., Bivand, R., Pebesma, E.J., Baddeley, E.A., Bibiko, H.-J., Dray, S., Forrest, D., Giraudoux, P., Golicher, D., Gómez Rubio, V., Hausmann, P., Jagger, T., Luque, S.P., Queen, D., Niccolai, A., Short, T., 2009. Maptools: Tools for reading and handling spatial objects. R Package Version 0.7-23.
42. Lillo, S., Céspedes, R., Balbontín, F., Ojeda, V., Saavedra, A., 2004. Evalaución del stock desovante de merluza del sur y merluza de cola en la zona sur-austral, año 2003. Informe Final proyecto FIP 2003-09. Instituto de Fomento Pesquero-Fondo de Investigación Pesquera, p. 70 (In Spanish). http://www.fip.cl/proyectos/2003/2003-09.htm.
43. Lillo, S., Espejo, M., Céspedes, R., Adasme, L., Blanco, J.L., Letelier, J., Braun, M., Valenzuela, V., 1997. Evalaución directa del stock de merluza de cola en la X y XI Regiones. Informe Final proyecto FIP 95-18. Instituto de Fomento Pesquero-Fondo de Investigación Pesquera, p. 70 (In spanish). http://www.fip.cl/prog_x_year/1995/9518.htm.
44. Lillo, S., Molina, E., Ojeda, V., Céspedes, R., Adasme, L., Balbontín, F., Rojas, M., Rojas, P., Saavedra, A., 2008. Evaluación hidroacústica del stock desovánte de merluza de cola en aguas exteriores, 2007. Informe Final proyecto FIP 2007-13. Instituto de Fomento Pesquero-Fondo de Investigación Pesquera, p. 94 (In spanish). http://www.fip.cl/proyectos/2007/2007-13.htm.
45. Lindsey J.K. Applying Generalized Linear Models 1997, Springer Texts in Statistics, p. 256. G. Casella, S. Fienberg, I. Olkin (Eds.).
46. Livingston M.E., Vignaux M., Schofield K.A. Estimating the annual proportion of nonspawning adults in New Zealand hoki, Macruronus novaezelandiae. Fish. Bull. 1997, 95:99-113.
47. Lo N.C., Jacobson L.D., Squire J.L. Indices of relative abundance from fish spotter data based on delta-lognormal. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 1992, 49:2515-2526.
48. Maunder M.N., Sibert J.R., Fonteneau A., Hampton J.H., Kleiber P., Harley S.J. Interpreting catch per unit effort data to assess the status of individual stocks and communities. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2006, 63:1373-1385.
49. Maunder M.N., Punt A.E. Standardizing catch and effort data: a review of recent approaches. Fish. Res. 2004, 70:141-159.
50. McCullagh P., Nelder J.A. Generalized Linear Models, Second edition. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 1989, vol. 37. Chapman and Hall, p. 511.
51. Meeus J. Astronomical Algorithms 1998, Willmann-Bell, Richmond, VA, p. 477. 2nd ed.
52. Nelder J.A., Wedderburn R.W.M. Generalized linear models. J. R. Statistic Soc. A. 1972, 135(Part 3):370.
53. Ortiz M., Arocha F. Alternative error distribution models for the standardization of catch rates of non-target species from a pelagic longline fishery: billfish species in the Venezuelan tuna longline fishery. Fish. Res. 2004, 70:275-297.
54. Ortíz M., Legault C., Ehrhardt N. An alternative method for estimating bycatch from the U.S. shrimp trawl fishery in the Gulf of Mexico, 1972-1995. Fish. Bull. 2000, 98:583-599.
55. Payá I. The diet of patagonian hake Merluccius australis polylepis and its daily ration of patagonian grenadier Macruronus magellanicus. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 1992, 12:753-760.
56. Payá, I., Montecinos, M., González, J., Céspedes, R., Adasme, L., Ojeda, V., Lillo, S., 2005. Investigación CTP regionalizada de merluza de cola, 2005 Fase II. Subsecretaria de Pesca-Instituto de Fomento Pesquero, p. 41 (In spanish; request a copy at ). http://www.subpesca.cl/.
57. Pebesma, E.J., Bivand, R.S., 2005. Classes and methods for spatial data in R. R News 5.
58. Pelletier D., Ferraris J. A multivariate approach for fishing tactics from commercial catch and effort data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2000, 57:51-65.
59. Punt A.E., Smith D.C., Thomson R.B., Haddon M., He X., Lyle J.M. Stock assessment of the blue grenadier Macruronus novaezelandiae resource off southeastern Australia. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2001, 52:701-717.
60. Punt E.A., Walker T.I., Taylor B.L., Pribac F. Standardization of catch and effort data in a spatially-structured shark fishery. Fish. Res. 2000, 45:129-145.
61. Quirijns F.J., Poos J.J., Rijnsdorp A.D. Standardizing commercial CPUE data in monitoring stock dynamics. Accounting for targeting behaviour in mixed fisheries. Fish. Res. 2008, 89(1):1-8.
62. R Development Core Team, 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.r-project.org/.
63. Richards S.A. Dealing with overdispersed count data in applied ecology. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45:218-227.
64. Schnute, J.T., Boers, N., Haigh, R., Couture-Beil, A., 2008. PBSmapping: PBS Mapping 2.59. R package version 2.59.
65. Shono H. Application of the Tweedie distribution to zero-catch data in CPUE analysis. Fish. Res. 2008, 93:154-162.
66. Shono H. Confidence interval estimation of CPUE year trend in delta type two step model. Fish. Sci. 2008, 74:712-717.
67. Smyth, G.K., 2009. Statmod: Statistical Modeling. R package version 1.4.0.
68. Stefánsson G. Análisis of groundfish survey abundante data: combining the GLM and delta approaches. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 1996, 53:577-588.
69. Stephens A., MacCall A. A multi-species approach to subsetting logbook data for purposes of estimating CPUE. Fish. Res. 2004, 70:299-310.
70. Swartzman G., Huang C.H., Kaluzny S. Spatial analysis of Bearing Sea groundfish survey data using generalized additive models. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 1992, 49:1366-1378.
71. Tascheri, R., 2009. Estandarización de la captura por unidad de esfuerzo de la merluza de cola (Macruronus magellanicus) en la pesquería demersal chilena: un enfoque que considera la intencionalidad del esfuerzo. Tésis para optar al grado de Magíster en Ciencias con mención en Pesquerías. Universisdad de Concepción. p. 111 (In spanish: available from the corresponding author).
72. Tascheri, R., Gálvez, P., Sateler, J., 2009. Investigación del estatus y evaluación de estrategias de explotación sustentables en merluza común, 2010. p. 95 (In spanish; request a copy at ). http://www.subpesca.cl/.
73. Venables W.N., Dichmont C.M. GLMs, GAMs and GLMMs: an overview of theory for applications in fisheries research. Fish. Res. 2004, 70(2-3):319-337.
74. Venables W.N., Dichmont C.M. A generalized linear model for catch allocation an example from Australia's Northern Prawn Fishery. Fish. Res. 2004, 70:409-426.
75. Venables W.N., Ripley B.D. Modern Applied Statistics with S 2002, Springer, New York. Fourth ed.
76. Walters C. Folly and fantasy in the analysis of spatial catch rate data. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 2003, 60:1433-1436.
77. Ward E.J. A review and comparison of four commonly used Bayesian and maximum likelihood model selection tools. Ecol. Model. 2008, 211:1-10.
78. Wedderburn R.W.M. Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss-Newton method. Biometrika 1974, 61(3):439-447.
79. Yañez, E., Pizarro, L., Alberti, M, 1985. Dinámica del stock de merluza común (Merluccius gayi, Guichenot 1848) explotado en la zona central de Chile (30S-40S) entre 1960 y 1982, In: Melo, T. (Eds.), Estudios en Pesquerías Chilenas. Escuela de Cs. Del Mar. Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, pp. 67-74.
80. Young, Z., Chong, J., Robotham, H., Gálvez, P., González, H., 1998. Análisis de la pesquería de merluza de cola en la zona sur austral. Informe Final FIP 96-37. Instituto de Fomento Pesquero-Fondo de Investigación Pesquera (In spanish). http://www.fip.cl/prog_x_year/1996/9637.htm.