Microbiological material exchanges among scientists

Research in Microbiology

Volumn 161, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 446-452

  Staley, James T ^a   FitzGerald, Kelly ^a   Fuerst, John A ^b   Dijkshoorn, Lenie ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Material transfer agreements; Microbial commons; Microbiological material exchange

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIUM CULTURE; LABORATORY; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; NOMENCLATURE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROKARYOTE; BACTERIA; CLASSIFICATION; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MICROBIOLOGY; STANDARDS;

BACTERIA; BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; CLASSIFICATION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MICROBIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; MICROBIOLOGY; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); PROKARYOTA;

EID: 77955334168     PISSN: 09232508     EISSN: 17697123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anonymous. 2008. OECD Compendium of Patent statistics.
2. Association of University Technology Managers website http://www.autm.net/aboutTT/aboutTT_bayhDoleAct.cfm.
3. Beattie A., Ehrlich P. The missing link in biodiversity conservation. Science 2010, 328:307-308. Letters in Science.
4. Christensen H., Bisgaard M., Frederiksen W., Mutters R., Kuhnert P., Olsen J.E. Is characterization of a single isolate sufficient for valid publication of a new genus or species? Proposal to modify recommendation 30b of the Bacteriological Code (1990 Revision). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2001, 51:2221-2225.
5. Dedeurwaerdere T. Global microbial commons: institutional challenges for the global exchange and distribution of microorganisms in the life sciences. Res. Microbiol. 2010, 161(6):414-421.
6. Doremus H. Contracts for bioprospecting: the Yellowstone national Park experience. Microbial Diversity and Bioprospecting 2004, 450-457. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. A.T. Bull (Ed.).
7. Dyksterhouse S., Gray J., Herwig R.P., Lara J.C., Staley J.T. Cycloclasticus pugetii, gen. et sp. nov., an aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium from marine environments. Int. J. System. Bacteriol. 1995, 45:116-123.
8. Gosink J., Woese C.R., Staley J.T. Polaribacter gen. nov, with three new species, P. irgensii sp. nov., P. franzmannii sp. nov., and P. filamentus sp. nov., gas vacuolate polar marine bacteria of the Cytophaga/Flavobacterium/Bacteroides group and reclassification of " Flectobacillus glomeratus" as Polaribacter glomeratus comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1998, 48:223-235.
9. Hedlund B.P., Gosink J.J., Staley J.T. Verrucomicrobia div. nov., a new division of the Bacteria containing three new species of Prosthecobacter. A. Van Leeuwenhoek 1997, 72:29-38.
10. Janssens D., et al. The role of public biological resource centers in providing a basic infrastructure for microbial research. Res. Microbiol. 2010, 161(6):422-429.
11. Jenkins C., Samudrala R., Anderson I., Hedlund B.P., Petroni G., Michailova N., Pinel N., Overbeek R., Rosati G., Staley J.T. Genes for the cytoskeletal protein tubulin in the bacterial genus Prosthecobacter. PNAS 2002, 99:17049-17054.
12. Mocali S., Benedetti A. Exploring research frontiers in microbiology: the challenge of metagenomics in soil microbiology. Res. Microbiol. 2010, 161(6):497-505.
13. Moore E.R.B., Mihaylova S.A., Vandamme P., Krichevsky M.I., Dijkshoorn L. Microbial systematics and taxonomy: relevance for a microbial commons. Res. Microbiol. 2010, 161(6):430-438.
14. Perrone J., Soriano J. Letter to the Editor. ASM News 2005, 71:393-394.
15. Pfennig N. Photosynthetic bacteria. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 1967, 21:231-295.
16. Rai A.K., Reichman J.H., Uhlir P.F., Crossman C. Pathways across the valley of death. Novel intellectual property strategies for accelerated drug discoveries. Gene Patents and Collaborative Licensing Models 2009, 247-288. CUP, Cambridge, UK. G. Van Overwalle (Ed.).
17. Reichman J.H. Of green tulips and legal kudzu: repackaging rights in subpatentable innovation. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 2000, 53:1743-1798.
18. Safrin S. Hyperownership in a time of biotechnological promise: the international conflict to control the building blocks of life. Am. J. Int. Law 2004, 98:641-685.
19. Sneath, P.H.A. (Ed.), 1992. International Code of Nomenclature of bacteria (1990 Revision). American Society of Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
20. Staley J.T. Prosthecomicrobium and Ancalomicrobium: new freshwater prosthecate bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 1968, 95:1921-1942.
21. Staley J.T., Konopka A.E. Measurement of in situ activities of heterotrophic microorganisms in aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 1985, 39:321-346.
22. Svarstad H. The historical context of present bioprospecting - four cases. Microbial Diversity and Bioprospecting 2004, 441-444. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. A.T. Bull (Ed.).
23. Tamayo G., Guevara L., Gamez R. Biodiversity prospecting: the INBio experience. Microbial Diversity and Bioprospecting 2004, 445-449. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. A.T. Bull (Ed.).
24. Tate K.T. The Convention on biological diversity and benefit sharing. Microbial Diversity and Bioprospecting 2004, 431-439. ASM Press, Washington. A.T. Bull (Ed.).
25. Tindall B., De Vos P., Trüper H.G. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes; XIth international (IUMS) congress of bacteriology and applied microbiology. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58:1737-1745.
26. Trüper H.G., Tindall B.J. Letter to the Editor. ASM News 2005, 71:259-260.
27. Vandamme P., Pot B., Gillis M., De Vos P., Kersters K., Swings J. Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial systematics. Microbiol. Rev. 1996, 60:407-438.