The accuracy of binocular fixation preference for the diagnosis of strabismic amblyopia

Journal of AAPOS

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 205-210

  Procianoy, Letícia ^a   Procianoy, Edson ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBLYOPIA; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR FIXATION PREFERENCE TEST; BINOCULAR VISION; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EYE FIXATION; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RATING SCALE; SCHOOL CHILD; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRABISMUS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBLYOPIA; CHILD; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRABISMUS; VISION TESTS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955331660     PISSN: 10918531     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Amblyopia. Preferred Practice Pattern® Guidelines. 2007. http://www.aao.org/ppp. Accessed June 1, 2008.
2. P. Knapp, and S. Moore Diagnostic procedures in an orthoptic evaluation Am Orthopt J 12 1962 63 69
3. O.M. Hakim Association between fixation preference testing and strabismic pseudoamblyopia J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 44 2007 174 177
4. D. Laws, C.P. Noonan, A. Ward, and A. Chandna Binocular fixation pattern and visual acuity in children with strabismic amblyopia J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 37 2000 24 28
5. E.C. Sener, M.C. Mocan, and S. Gedik The reliability of grading the fixation preference test for the assessment of interocular visual acuity differences in patients with strabismus J AAPOS 6 2002 191 194
6. K.W. Wright, P.M. Edelman, F. Walonker, and S. Yiu Reliability of fixation preference testing in diagnosing amblyopia Arch Ophthalmol 104 1986 549 553
7. K.W. Wright, F. Walonker, and P. Edelman 10-Diopter fixation test for amblyopia Arch Ophthalmol 99 1981 1242 1246
8. H. Atilla, D. Oral, S. Coskun, and N. Erkam Poor correlation between "fix-follow-maintain" monocular/binocular fixation pattern evaluation and presence of functional amblyopia Binocul Vis Strabismus Q 16 2001 85 90
9. D.S. Friedman, J. Katz, and M.X. Repka Lack of concordance between fixation preference and HOTV optotype visual acuity in preschool children: The Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study Ophthalmology 115 2008 1796 1799
10. S.A. Cotter, K. Tarczy-Hornoch, and E. Song Fixation preference and visual acuity testing in a population-based cohort of preschool children with amblyopia risk factors Ophthalmology 116 2009 145 153
11. R.F. Zipf Binocular fixation pattern Arch Ophthalmol 94 1976 401 405
12. J.J. Deeks, and D.G. Altman Diagnostic tests 4: Likelihood ratios BMJ 329 2004 168 169
13. D.A. Grimes, and K.F. Schulz Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios Lancet 365 2005 1500 1505
14. A. Agresti Categorical data analysis 2nd ed. 2002 Wiley-Interscience Hoboken, NJ 710
15. D.G. Altman, and J.M. Bland Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values BMJ 309 1994 102
16. D.G. Altman, and J.M. Bland Diagnostic tests: 1. Sensitivity and specificity BMJ 308 1994 1552