Mammographic screening for breast cancer: An invited review of the benefits and costs

Breast

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 268-272

  Greif, Jon M ^a,b,c  

^a Bay Area Breast Surgeons Inc   (United States)

^b Summitt Medical Center   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Benefit; Breast cancer; Cost; Mammography; Screening

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; ECONOMICS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; MASS SCREENING; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIMARY PREVENTION; PROCEDURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIMARY PREVENTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH; WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 77955319061     PISSN: 09609776     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2010.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Shapiro S., Strax P., Venet L. Evaluation of periodic breast cancer screening with mammography. Methodology and early observations. JAMA 1966, 195:731-738.
2. U.S.Preventive Services Task Force Screening for breast cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009, 151:716-726.
3. Kolata G. New guidelines suggest cutback in mammograms. NY Times Nov 17, 2009.
4. Gøtzsche P.C., Nielsen M. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, (4). Art. No. CD001877.
5. Cady B, Webb M, Michaelson J, Smith BI. Death from breast cancer occurs predominantly in women not participating in mammographic screening. Abstract No. 24, Proc. ASCO Breast Cancer Symposium. San Francisco; October, 2009. [accessed 09.02.2010]. http://www.asco.org/ASCOv2/Meetings/Abstracts%3F%26vmview%3Dabst_detail_view%26confID%3D70%26abstractID%3D40559.
6. Max W. The cost of breast cancer in California - final report. California Breast Cancer Research Program Grant # 9PB-0025; 2006. [accessed 20.02.2010]. http://www.cbcrp.org/RESEARCH/PageGrant.asp%3Fgrant_id%3D2591.
7. Lehman C.D., Smith R.A. The role of MRI in breast cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2009, 7:1109-1115.
8. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Breast cancer screening and diagnosis panel members. [accessed 8.02.2010]. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/breast-screening.pdf.
9. Smith R.A., Cokkinides V., Brawley O.W. Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 2009, 59:27-41.
10. Nelson H.D., Tyne K., Naik A., Bougatsos C., Chan B.K., Humphrey L. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 2009, 151:727-737.
11. Kerlikowske K., Miglioretti D.L., Buist D.S., Walker R., Carney P.A. National cancer institute-sponsored breast cancer surveillance consortium. Declines in invasive breast cancer and use of postmenopausal hormone therapy in a screening mammography population. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007, 99:1335-1339.
12. American Cancer Society Breast cancer facts & figures 2009-2010, American Cancer Society, Inc, Atlanta.
13. Heron M.P., Hoyert D.L., Murphy S.L., Xu J.Q., Kochanek K.D., Tejada-Vera B. Deaths: final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009, 57:1-133. [accessed 20.02.2010]. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr57/nvsr57_14.pdf.
14. Tabár L., Vitak B., Yen M.F., Chen H.H., Smith R.A., Duffy S.W. Number needed to screen: lives saved over 20 years of follow-up in mammographic screening. J Med Screen 2004, 11:126-129.
15. Rosenquist C.J., Lindfors K.K. Screening mammography beginning at age 40 years: a reappraisal of cost-effectiveness. Cancer 1998, 82:2235-2240.
16. Salzmann P., Kerlikowske K., Phillips K. Cost-effectiveness of extending screening mammography guidelines to include women 40 to 49 years of age. Ann Intern Med 1997, 127:955-965.
17. Ward E., Halpern M., Shrag N., Cokkinides V., DeSantis C., Bandi P., et al. Association of insurance with cancer care utilization and outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin 2008, 58:9-31.
18. Stout N.K., Rosenberg M.A., Trentham-Dietz A., Smith M., Robinson S.M., Fryback D.G. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006, 98:774-782.
19. Ahern C.H., Shen Y. Cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography and clinical breast examination strategies: a comparison with current guidelines. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009, 18:718-725.
20. Smith R.A. An overview of mammography: benefits and limitations. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2003, 1:264-271.
21. Kolb G.R. New tools for cost-effective delivery of breast imaging. Radiol Manage 2002, 24:22-26. 28, 30, 32-34.
22. de Gelder R., Bulliard J.L., de Wolf C., Fracheboud J, Draisma G., Schopper D., et al. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic versus organized mammography screening in Switzerland. Eur J Cancer 2009, 45:127-138.
23. Burnside E., Belkora J., Esserman L. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States. Clin Breast Cancer 2001, 2:145-152.
24. Mandelblatt J.S., Cronin K.A., Bailey S., Berry D.A., de Koning H.J., Draisma G., et al. Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Ann Intern Med 2009, 151:738-747.
25. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Performance measures for 3,884,059 screening mammography examinations from 1996 to 2007 by age & time (months) since previous mammography. [accessed 8.02.2010]. http://breastscreening.cancer.gov/data/performance/screening/perf_age_time.html.
26. Gur D., Sumkin J.H. CAD in screening mammography. Amer J Roentgenol 2006, 187:1474.
27. Pirola M.E., Houssami N., Maltagliati E., et al. Quality of mammography screening in the Milan programme: evidence of improved sensitivity based on interval cancer proportional incidence and radiological review. Breast 2009, 18:208-210. 10.1016/j.breast.2009.03.004.
28. Pisano E.D., Gatsonis C., Hendrick E., Yaffe M., Baum J.K., Acharyya S., et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005, 353:1773-1783.
29. Tosteson A.N., Stout N.K., Fryback D.G., et al. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 2008, 148:1-10.
30. Law J., Faulkner K., Young K.C. Risk factors for induction of breast cancer by X-rays and their implications for breast screening. Br J Radiol 2007, 80:261-266.