Light induced fading in the OSL response of Al2O3:C

Radiation Measurements

Volumn 45, Issue 3-6, 2010, Pages 523-526

  Benevides, L ^a   Romanyukha, A ^a   Hull, F ^a   Duffy, M ^a   Voss, S ^a   Moscovitch, M ^b  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Al2O3:C; Dosimetry; Light induced fading; Optically stimulated luminescence; OSL

Indexed keywords

AL2O3:C; DOSE LEVELS; FADING EFFECT; INDUCED SIGNAL; LIGHT EXPOSURE; OPTICALLY STIMULATED LUMINESCENCE; SENSITIVE ELEMENTS; US NAVY;

ALUMINUM; DOSIMETRY; EXPERIMENTS; LUMINESCENCE; PARTICLE DETECTORS;

LIGHT;

EID: 77955309661     PISSN: 13504487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.12.018     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. 3:C single crystal detectors Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 33 1990 119 122
2. L. Bøtter-Jensen, S.W.S. McKeever, and A.G. Wintle Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimetry 2003 Elsevier Amsterdam 0 44450684 5
3. Engineering Tool Box http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/light-level-rooms- d-708.html 2009
4. 3:C detectors exposed to different light sources Nucl. Instrum. Methods 266 2008 2915 2917
5. 3:C Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 65 1996 267 272
6. S.W.S. Mckeever, and M. Moscovitch Topics under debate - on the advantages and disadvantages of optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry and thermoluminescence dosimetry Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 104 2003 263 270
7. S.D. Miller, and C. Yoder Cooled optically luminescence dosimetry in plastic materials Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 66 1996 89 93
8. M. Moscovitch Personnel dosimetry using LiF: Mg, Cu, P Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 85 1999 49 56
9. 3:C Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 47 1993 251 253