Contact urticaria caused by a fluorescent dye

Australasian Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 208-209

  Sugiura, Keiji ^a   Sugiura, Mariko ^a   Sasaki, Kazumi ^b   Mori, Ayumi ^b  

^a Department of Environmental Dermatology and Allergology   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND EVALUATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

contact urticaria; dye; fluorescent

Indexed keywords

FLUORESCENT DYE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CONTACT URTICARIA; HUMAN; MALE; MASS FRAGMENTOGRAPHY; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PRICK TEST; PROTECTIVE CLOTHING; SHOE;

ADULT; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DERMATITIS, OCCUPATIONAL; FLUORESCENT DYES; GLOVES, PROTECTIVE; HUMANS; IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; MALE; SHOES; URTICARIA;

EID: 77955302458     PISSN: 00048380     EISSN: 14400960     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2010.00645.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Smita A, Maibach HI. Contact urticaria syndrome (introduction). In : Smita A, Arto L, Maibach HI (eds). Contact Urticaria Syndrome. New York : CRC Press LLC, 1997 1 3.
2. Hamilton TK, Zug KA. Triethanolamine allergy inadvertently discovered from a fluorescent marking pen. Am. J. Contact Dermatitis 1996 7 : 164 165.
3. Di Leo E, Nettis E, Aloia AM et al. Fixed drug eruption due to sodium fluorescein. Contact Dermatitis 2008 59 : 191 192.
4. Japanese Standard Association. General rules for molecular absorptiometric analysis. In : Japanese Industrial Standards Committee (ed.). JIS Handbook. Tokyo : Heibunsha, 1993 235 244.
5. Geroge S. Taschenatlas der Analytik. New York : George Thieme Verlag, 1992.
6. Japanese Standard Association. General rules for analytical methods in gas chromatography mass spectrometry. In : Japanese Industrial Standards Committee (ed.). JIS Handbook. Tokyo : Heibunsha, 1993 296 301.
7. Liva RP, Oliveria CL, Marques MV et al. Adverse reactions of SF angiography: a prospective study. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 2007 70 : 615 618.