Criteria for psychosomatic research (DCPR) in the medical setting

Current Psychiatry Reports

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 246-254

  Porcelli, Piero ^a   Rafanelli, Chiara ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR DIGESTIVE DISEASES   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Abnormal illness behavior; Alexithymia; Demoralization; Diagnostic criteria for psychosomatic research; Health anxiety; Somatization; Type A behavior

Indexed keywords

ALEXITHYMIA; ANXIETY; ATTITUDE TO ILLNESS; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DEMORALIZATION; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISTRESS SYNDROME; HUMAN; IRRITABILITY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHOBIA; PREVALENCE; PSYCHOSOMATIC DISORDER; REVIEW; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOMATIZATION; THANATOPHOBIA; TYPE A BEHAVIOR; VALIDATION PROCESS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; EMOTIONAL DISORDER; HEALTH STATUS; ILLNESS BEHAVIOR; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOSOMATICS; STANDARD;

AFFECTIVE SYMPTOMS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; ILLNESS BEHAVIOR; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC DISORDERS; PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE; TYPE A PERSONALITY;

EID: 77955293233     PISSN: 15233812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11920-010-0104-z     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Barron J, ed: Making Diagnosis Meaningful: Enhancing Evaluation and Treatment of Psychological Disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1998.
2. Fava GA, Sonino N: Psychosomatic assessment. Psychother Psychosom 2009, 78:333-341. The overall issue of goals and strategies of psychosomatic assessment is carefully explored in this article. The authors make a strong argument for the advantages of the clinimetric methods for the improvement of the clinical process, shared decision making, and selfmanagement and included the DCPR system in the clinimetric framework.
3. Wise TN, Birket-Smith TN: The somatoform disorders for DSM-V: The need for change in process and contents. Psychosomatics 2000, 43:437-440.
4. Lipowski ZJ :Somatization. Am J Psychiatry 1987, 47:160-167.
5. Dimsdale J, Creed F: The proposed diagnosis of somatic symptom disorders in DSM-V to replace somatoform disorders in DSM-IVa preliminary report. J Psychosom Res 2009, 66:473-476.
6. Mayou R, Kirmayer LJ, Simon G, et al.: Somatoform disorders: Times for a new approach in DSM-V. Am J Psychiatry 2005, 162:847-855.
7. Kissen DM: The significance of syndrome shift and late syndrome association in psychosomatic medicine. J Nerv Ment Dis 1963, 136:34-42.
8. Fava GA, Freyberger HJ, Bech P, et al.: Diagnostic criteria for use in psychosomatic research. Psychother Psychosom 1995, 63:1-8.
9. Sirri L, Fabbri S, Fava GA, Sonino N: New strategies in the assessment of psychological factors affecting medical conditions. J Person Assess 2007, 89:216-228. In this article, the authors review those DCPR clusters that have been found more prevalent in clinical settings, offer suggestions for the use of some independent assessment tools for evaluating DCPR syndromes, and discuss the clinical implications that support the inclusion of the DCPR in the DSM-V.
10. Pilowsky I: Abnormal Illness Behavior. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley; 1997.
11. Porcelli P, Sonino N, eds: Psychological Factors Affecting Medical Conditions. A New Classification for DSM-V. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 2007. This monograph includes descriptions of each DCPR cluster, an extensive review on validation findings, prevalence data in several medical settings, discussion of clinical implications of the application of DCPR syndromes within the framework of psychological factors affecting medical conditions, and the structured interview for the assessment of DCPR.
12. Galeazzi GM, Ferrari S, Mackinnon A, Rigatelli M: Interrater reliability, prevalence, and relation to ICD-10 diagnoses of the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research in consultationliaison psychiatry patients. Psychosomatics 2004, 45:386-393.
13. Beresnevaité M, Taykor GJ, Bagby RM: Assessing alexithymia and type A behavior in coronary heart disease patients: A multimethod approach. Psychother Psychosom 2007, 76:186- 192. In this study, the diagnostic accuracy of the DCPR syndromes of alexithymia and TAB is evaluated with validated measures (Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 and Jenkins Activity Survey) as external criteria, showing good to excellent results.
14. Porcelli P, De Carne M: Criterion-related validity of the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research for alexithymia in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. Psychother Psychosom 2001, 70:184-188.
15. Fukunishi I, Hosaka T, Aoki T, et al.: Criterion-related validity of diagnostic criteria for alexithymia in a general hospital psychiatric setting. Psychother Psychosom 1996, 65:82-85.
16. Mangelli L, Semprini F, Sirri L, et al.: Use of the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR) in a community sample. Psychosomatics 2006, 47:143-146.
17. Mattila AK, Saarni SI, Saliminen JK, et al.: Alexithymia and health-related quality of life in a general population. Psychosomatics 2009, 50:59-68.
18. Picardi A, Porcelli P, Pasquini P, et al.: Integration of multiple criteria for psychosomatic assessment of dermatological patients. Psychosomatics 2006, 47:122-128.
19. Fassino S, Abbate Daga G, Pierò A, et al.: Psychological factors affecting eating disorders. In Psychological Factors Affecting Medical Conditions. A New Classification for DSM-V. Edited by Porcelli P, Sonino N. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 2007:142-168.
20. Porcelli P, De Carne M, Fava GA: Assessing somatization in functional gastrointestinal disorders: Integration of different criteria. Psychother Psychosom 2000, 69:198-204.
21. Ferrari S, Galeazzi GM, Mackinnon A, Rigatelli M: Frequent attenders in primary care: Impact of medical, psychiatric and psychosomatic diagnoses. Psychother Psychosom 2008, 77:306-314. This is the first study evaluating the role played by DCPR in differentiating between high and expected use of health care resources in primary care. The study showed that the DCPR system was useful for identifying subthreshold psychopathology that distinguished patients with high health care use.
22. Sonino N, Ruini C, Navarrini C, et al.: Psychosocial impairment in patients treated for pituitary disease: A controlled study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2007, 67:719-726.
23. Porcelli P, Bellomo A, Quartesan R, et al.: Psychosocial functioning in consultation-liaison-psychiatry patients: Influence of psychosomatic syndromes, psychopathology and somatization. Psychother Psychosom 2009, 78:352-358. This study showed for the first time the clinical utility of the DCPR system in a population with high psychopathology. In a sample of patients referred to CL psychiatry service, poor psychosocial functioning was independently predicted by DCPR syndromes over and above the contributions of DSM-IV categories and elevated somatic symptom reporting, even after controlling for sociodemographic and medical variables.
24. Grandi S, Fabbri S, Tossani E, et al.: Psychological evaluation after cardiac transplantation: The integration of different criteria. Psychother Psychosom 2001, 70:176-183.
25. Rafanelli C, Roncuzzi R, Finos L, et al.: Psychological assessment in cardiac rehabilitation. Psychother Psychosom 2003, 72:343-349.
26. Rafanelli C, Roncuzzi R, Milaneschi Y, et al.: Minor depression as a cardiac risk factor after coronary artery bypass surgery. Psychosomatics 2006, 47:289-295.
27. Sirri L, Grandi S, Fava GA: The Illness Attitude Scales. Psychother Psychosom 2008, 77:337-350. This is a comprehensive review of Kellner's IAS that has been widely used in past years. The IAS is a clinimetric index for the assessment of worry about illness, concerns about pain, health habits, hypochondriacal beliefs, thanatophobia, disease phobia, bodily preoccupations, treatment experience, and effects of symptoms that also constitutes some dimensions of AIB evaluated with the DCPR clusters.
28. Fava GA, Grandi S, Rafanelli C, et al.: Explanatory therapy of hypochondriasis. J Clin Psychiatry 2000, 61:317-322.
29. Grassi L, Sabato S, Rossi E, et al.: Use of the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research in oncology. Psychother Psychosom 2005, 74:100-107.
30. Maunder RG, Hunter JJ: Attachment and psychosomatic medicine: Developmental contributions to stress and disease. Pychosom Med 2001, 63:556-567.
31. Kellner R: Psychosomatic syndromes, somatization and somatoform disorders. Psychother Psychosom 1994, 61:4-24.
32. Mangelli L, Bravi A, Fava GA, et al.: Assessing somatization with various diagnostic criteria. Psychosomatics 2009, 50:38-41. In a large group of patients with functional somatic symptoms and recent first myocardial infarction, this study showed that the DCPR clusters of AIB and somatization identified clinical and subthreshold psychosomatic syndromes. The two DCPR clusters had a ratio 2 to 2.75 times greater than the DSM-IV diagnoses included in the rubric of somatoform disorders.
33. Frank JD: Psychotherapy: The restoration of morale. Am J Psychiatry 1974, 131:271-274.
34. Cockram CA, Doros G, de Figueiredo JM: Diagnosis and measurement of subjective incompetence: The clinical hallmark of demoralization. Psychother Psychosom 2009, 78:342-345.
35. Clarke DM, Kissane DW: Demoralization: Its phenomenology and importance. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2002, 36:733-742.
36. Mangelli L, Fava GA, Grandi S, et al.: Assessing demoralization and depression in the setting of medical disease. J Clin Psychiatry 2005, 66:391-394.
37. Porcelli P, De Carne M: Non-fearful panic disorder in gastroenterology. Psychosomatics 2008, 49:543-545.
38. Snaith RP, Taylor CM: Irritability. Br J Psychiatry 1985, 147:127-136.
39. Mangelli L, Fava GA, Grassi L, et al.: Irritable mood in Italian patients with medical disease. J Nerv Ment Dis 2006, 194:226-228.
40. Friedman M, Rosenman RH: Type A Behavior and Your Heart. New York: Knopf; 1974.
41. Bagby RM, Taylor GJ, Parker JD, Doclems SE: The development of the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia: Item selection, factor structure, reliability and concurrent validity. Psychother Psychosom 2006, 75:25-39.
42. Grassi L, Mangelli L, Fava GA, et al.: Psychosomatic characterization of adjustment disorders in the medical setting: Some suggestions for DSM-V. J Affect Disord 2007, 101:251-254. Using a large sample of medical patients, this study showed that the wide DSM-IV category of adjustment disorders may be considered a cover for multiple DCPR syndromes, such as AIB, somatization, and demoralization.
43. Ryff CD, Dienberg Love G, Urry HL, et al.: Psychological wellbeing and ill-being: Do they have distinct or mirrored biological correlates? Psychother Psychosom 2006, 75:85-95.
44. Picardi A, Pasquini P, Abeni D, et al.: Psychosomatic assessment of skin diseases in clinical practice. Psychother Psychosom 2005, 74:315-322.
45. Grassi L, Rossi, E, Sabato S, et al.: Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research and psychosocial variables in breast cancer patients. Psychosomatics 2004, 45:483-491.
46. Sonino N, Navarrini C, Ruini C, et al.: Persistent psychological distress in patients treated for endocrine disease. Psychother Psychosom 2004, 73:78-83.
47. Ottolini F, Modena MG, Rigatelli M: Prodromal symptoms in myocardial infarction. Psychother Psychosom 2005, 74:323-327.
48. Porcelli P, De Carne M, Todarello O: Prediction of treatment outcome of patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders by the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research. Psychother Psychosom 2004, 73:166-173.
49. Fava GA, Wise TN: Psychological factors affecting either identified or feared medical conditions: A solution for somatoform disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2007, 164:1002-1003. This editorial focused on the theoretical and clinical challenges that should be faced in the diagnosis of psychosomatic conditions in the DSM-V. The authors introduced their view about the utility of including hypochondriasis and six DCPR syndromes as part of the next edition of the DSM.
50. Wise TN: Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research are necessary for DSM V. Psychother Psychosom 2009, 78:330-332. In this editorial, the author discusses the clinical implications of the DCPR and supports its inclusion in the DSM-V.