Evaluation of family history information within clinical documents and adequacy of HL7 clinical statement and clinical genomics family history models for its representation: A case report

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 337-340

  Melton, Genevieve B ^a,b   Raman, Nandhini ^a   Chen, Elizabeth S ^c   Sarkar, Indra Neil ^c   Pakhomov, Serguei ^a   Madoff, Robert D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; FAMILY HISTORY; HL7 CLINICAL GENOMICS FAMILY HISTORY MODEL; HL7 CLINICAL STATEMENT MODEL; HUMAN; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MERGED FAMILY HISTORY MODEL; ANAMNESIS; DATA MINING; FAMILY HEALTH; GENOMICS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

DATA COLLECTION; DATA MINING; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FAMILY HEALTH; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; MINNESOTA; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NARRATION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES;

EID: 77955289785     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2009.002238     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Guttmacher AE, Collins FS, Carmona RH. The family historyd-more important than ever. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2333-6.
2. Rich EC, Burke W, Heaton CJ, et al. Reconsidering the family history in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:273-80.
3. Feero WG, Bigley MB, Brinner KM. New standards and enhanced utility for family health history information in the electronic health record: an update from the American Health Information Community's Family Health History Multi-Stakeholder Workgroup. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:723-8.
4. Suther S, Goodson P. Barriers to the provision of genetic services by primary care physicians: a systematic review of the literature. Genet Med 2003;5:70-6.
5. HL7 clinical statement. http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/clinicalstatements/ and http://www.hl7.org/v3ballot/html/domains/uvcs/uvcs.htm.
6. HL7 clinical genomics family history. http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/clingenomics and http://www.hl7.org/v3ballot/html/domains/uvcg/editable/POCG_RM000040UV.htm.
7. Shabo Shvo A, Hughes KS. Family history information exchange services using HL7 clinical genomics standard specifications. Int'l Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems 2005;1:42-65.
8. United States Department of Health & Human Resources. Surgeon general's family history initiative. http://www.hhs.gov/familyhistory/. January 12, 2009.
9. Patel VL, Arocha JF, Kushniruk AW. Patients' and physicians' understanding of health and biomedical concepts: relationship to the design of EMR systems. J Biomed Inform 2002;35:8-16.
10. Goryachev S, Kim H, Zeng-Treitler Q. Identification and extraction of family history information from clinical reports. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008:247-51.
11. Friedlin J, McDonald CJ. Using a natural language processing system to extract and code family history data from admission reports. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:925. 12.
12. HL7 Version 3 Ballot Site - January. Clinical document architecture. http://www.hl7.org/v3ballot/html/infrastructure/cda/cda.htm, 2009.
13. Dolin RH, Alschuler L, Boyer S, et al. HL7 clinical document architecture, release 2. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:30-9.