Effect of operating pressure, matrix permeability and connate water saturation on performance of CO2 huff-and-puff process in matrix-fracture experimental model

Fuel

Volumn 89, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2985-2990

  Torabi, Farshid ^a   Asghari, Koorosh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

Author keywords

CO2 injection; Fractured reservoir; Huff and puff; Immiscible gas injection; Miscible displacement

Indexed keywords

CORE PERMEABILITY; CYLINDRICAL CORES; EXPERIMENTAL MODELS; EXPERIMENTAL SETUP; FIRST CYCLE; FRACTURE SYSTEMS; FRACTURED POROUS MEDIA; FRACTURED RESERVOIR; IMMISCIBLE GAS INJECTION; LOW PERMEABLE CORE; MATRIX; MATRIX CORE; MATRIX PERMEABILITY; MINIMUM MISCIBILITY PRESSURE; MISCIBLE DISPLACEMENT; OIL PRODUCTION; OIL RECOVERIES; OPERATING PRESSURE; RECOVERY FACTORS; SOAKING PERIODS; WATER SATURATIONS;

ENHANCED RECOVERY; FRACTURE; PARAFFINS; PETROLEUM RESERVOIRS; POROUS MATERIALS; PRESSURE EFFECTS; RECOVERY; STAINLESS STEEL; STARTING; WATER INJECTION;

EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 77955275666     PISSN: 00162361     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2010.05.020     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. 2 injection for light oil recovery. In: SPE/DOE 20208, presented at the SPE/DOE seventh symposium on enhanced oil recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA; 1990.
2. 2 huff and puff pilot project. In: SPE 15749, presented at the fifth SPE Middle East oil show, Manama, Bahrain; 1988.
3. 2 huff 'n' puff process for light-oil recovery. In: SPE reservoir engineering, presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, New Orleans, USA; 1986.
4. 2 huff 'n' puff tests in Texas. In: SPE reservoir engineering, presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, New Orleans, USA; 1986.
5. 2 huff 'n' puff process. In: SPE/DOE 20268, presented at the SPE/DOE seventh symposium on enhanced oil recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA; 1990.
6. 2 huff 'n' puff enhanced recovery, crooks gap field, Wyoming. In: SPE 21838, presented at the rocky mountain regional meeting and low-permeability reservoirs symposium, Denver, Colorado, USA; 1991.
7. 2 for recovery of light oils-field test database evaluation. Master Thesis, Department of Petroleum Engineering, Louisiana State University, USA; 1989.
8. 2 huff 'n' puff field test. In: SPE/DOE 24143, presented at the SPE/DOE eighth symposium on enhanced oil recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA; 1992.
9. Wang C, Gaoming L. Huff 'n' puff recovery technique on waterout horizontal wells. In: SPE 104491, presented at the SPE eastern regional meeting, Canton, Ohio, USA; 2006.
10. 2 huff 'n' puff using relative permeability hysteresis. In: SPE 16710, presented at the 62nd annual technical conference and exhibition of SPE, Dallas, Texas, USA; 1987.
11. 2 huff 'n' puff) in South Louisiana. In: SPE 15497, presented at the annual technical conference and exhibition, New Orleans, Loss Angelus, USA; 1986.
12. 2 injection, Bati Raman, Turkey. In: SPE 20883, presented at the Europe conference, The Hague, Netherlands; 1990.
13. L.W. Holm Miscibility and miscible displacement J Pet Technol 38 8 1986 817 818
14. 2 injection into a fractured core. In: SPE 99649, presented at the SPE/DOE symposium on improved oil recovery, 22-26 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA; 2006.
15. Mohammed-Singh L, Singhal AK, Sim S. Screening criteria for carbon dioxide huff 'n' puff operations. In: SPE 100044, presented at the SPE/DOE symposium on improved oil recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA; 2006.
16. D.E. Menzie, and R.F. Nielsen A study of the vaporization of crude oil by carbon dioxide repressuring J Pet Technol 15 11 1963 1237 1252