Inhibition of predator attraction to kairomones by non-host plant volatiles for herbivores: A bypass-trophic signal

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2010, Pages

  Zhang, Qing He ^a,b   Schlyter, Fredrik ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b Sterling International Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

1 OCTEN 3 OL; 3 CARENE; 3 OCTANOL; HORMONE; IPSDIENOL; KAIROMONE; MYRCENOL; PHEROMONE; PINENE; TERPINOLENE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VERBENOL; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

ANGIOSPERM; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANTENNA; ARTICLE; BEETLE; CONIFER; CONTROLLED STUDY; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; PINE; PLANT INSECT INTERACTION; PREDATOR AVOIDANCE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECIES HABITAT; SPRUCE;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL ASSAY; CHROMATOGRAPHY, GAS; HUMANS; PHEROMONES; PLANTS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR;

CLERIDAE; COLEOPTERA; CONIFEROPHYTA; HEXAPODA; IPS; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; PICEA; SCOLYTINAE; THANASIMUS FORMICARIUS;

EID: 77955261784     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011063     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Raffa KF (2001) Mixed messages across multiple trophic levels: the ecology of bark beetle chemical communication systems. Chemoecology 11: 49-65.
2. Vet LEM, Dicke M (1992) Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annual Review of Entomology 37: 141-172.
3. Kielty J, Allen-Williams L, Underwood N, Eastwood E (1996) Behavioral responses of three species of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to olfactory cues associated with prey and habitat. Journal of Insect Behavior 9: 237-250.
4. Price PW (1981) Semiochemicals in evolutionary time. In: Nordlund DA, Jones RL, Lewis WJ, eds. Semiochemicals: their role in pest control. New York: John Wiley & Sons. pp 251-279.
5. Vet LEM (1999) From chemical to population ecology: Infochemical use in an evolutionary context. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25: 31-49.
6. Schroeder LM (1992) Olfactory recognition of nonhosts aspen and birch by conifer bark beetles Tomicus piniperda and Hylurgops palliatus. Journal of Chemical Ecology 18: 1583-1593.
7. Zhang QH, Schlyter F (2004) Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer-inhabiting bark beetles. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 6: 1-20.
8. Zhang QH, Schlyter F, Birgersson G (2000) Bark volatiles from nonhost angiosperm trees of spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): Chemical and electrophysiological analysis. Chemoecology 10: 69-80.
9. Byers JA, Zhang QH, Schlyter F, Birgersson G (1998) Volatiles from nonhost birch trees inhibit pheromone response in spruce bark beetles. Naturwissenschaften 85: 557-561.
10. Zhang QH, Schlyter F (2003) Redundancy, synergism, and active inhibitory range of non-host volatiles in reducing pheromone attraction in European spruce bark beetle Ips typographus. Oikos 101: 299-310.
11. Graves AD, Holsten EH, Ascerno ME, Zogas K, Hard JS, et al. (2008) Protection of spruce from colonization by the bark beetle, Ips perturbatus, in Alaska. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 1825-1839.
12. Mauchline AL, Osborne JL, Martin AP, Poppy GM, Powell W (2005) The effects of non-host plant essential oil volatiles on the behaviour of the pollen beetle Meligethes aeneus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 114: 181-188.
13. Linn CE, Darnbroski HR, Feder JL, Berlocher SH, Nojima S, et al. (2004) Postzygotic isolating factor in sympatric speciation in Rhagoletis flies: Reduced response of hybrids to parental host-fruit odors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 17753-17758.
14. Nottingham SF, Hardie J, Dawson GW, Hick AJ, Pickett JA, et al. (1991) Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of aphids to host and nonhost plant volatiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology 17: 1231-1242.
15. McNair C, Gries G, Gries R (2000) Cherry bark tortrix Enarmonia formosana: Olfactory recognition of and behavioral deterrence by nonhost angio- and gymnosperm volatiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26: 809-821.
16. Weslien J (1994) Interactions within and between species at different densities of the bark beetle Ips typographus and its predator Thanasimus formicarius. Entomologia Experimentalis & Applicata 71: 133-143.
17. Schroeder LM, Weslien J (1994) Interactions between the phloem-feeding species Tomicus piniperda (Col, Scolytidae) and Acanthocinus aedilis (Col, Cerambycidae), and the predator Thanasimus formicarius (Col, Cleridae) with special reference to brood production. Entomophaga 39: 149-157.
18. Gauß R (1954) Der Ameisenbuntkä fer Thanasimus (Clerus) formicarius Latr. als Borkenkä ferfeind. In: Wellenstein G, Ringingen G, eds. Die Grosse Borkenkä- ferkalamitä t in Südwestdeutschland 1944-1951: Selbstverlag der Forstschutzstelle Südwest. pp 417-429.
19. Hilszczanski J, Gibb H, Bystrowski C (2007) Insect natural enemies of Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera, Scolytinae) in managed and unmanaged stands of mixed lowland forest in Poland. Journal of Pest Science 80: 99-107.
20. Schlyter F, Lundgren U (1993) Distribution of a bark beetle and its predator within and outside old growth forest nature reserves: No increase of hazard near reserves. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 9: 246-256.
21. Warzée N (2005) Prey unpredictability and unfavourable host trees influence the spatial distribution of the polyphagous predator Thanasimus formicarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Cleridae) [Ph.D.]. Brussels, Belgium: Université Libre de Bruxelles. 112 p.
22. Seybold SJ, Huber DPW, Lee JC, Graves AD, Bohlmann J (2006) Pine monoterpenes and pine bark beetles: A marriage of convenience for defence and chemical communication. Phytochemistry Reviews 5: 143-178.
23. Schroeder LM, Lindelöw A (1989) Attraction of scolytids and associated beetles by different absolute amounts and proportions of a-pinene and ethanol. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15: 807-817.
24. Bakke A, Kvamme T (1981) Kairomone response in Thanasimus predators to pheromone components of Ips typographus. Journal of Chemical Ecology 7: 305-312.
25. Tømmeras BA (1988) The clerid beetle Thanasimus formicarius is attracted to the pheromone of the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum. Experientia (Basel) 44: 536-537.
26. Tømmeras BA (1985) Specialization of the olfactory receptor cells in the bark beetle Ips typographus and its predator Thanasimus formicarius to bark beetle pheromones and host tree volatiles. Journal of Comparative Physiology A - Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology 157: 335-341.
27. Hansen K (1983) Reception of bark beetle pheromone in the predaceous clerid beetle, Thanasimus formicarius (Coleoptera: Cleridae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A -Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology 150: 371-378.
28. van Baalen M, Krivan V, van Rijn PCJ, Sabelis MW (2001) Alternative food, switching predators, and the persistence of predator-prey systems. American Naturalist 157: 512-524.
29. Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Ed.). HillsdaleNJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp 567.
30. Schroeder LM (2003) Differences in responses to a-pinene and ethanol, and flight periods between the bark beetle predators Thanasimus femoralis and T. formicarius (Col: Cleridae). Forest Ecology and Management 177: 301-311.
31. Dicke M, Sabelis MW (1988) Infochemical terminology: Based on cost-benefit analysis rather than origin of compounds? Functional Ecology 2: 131-139.
32. Ruther J, Meiners T, Steidle JLM (2002) Rich in phenomena-lacking in terms. A classification of kairomones. Chemoecology 12: 161-167.
33. Niklasson M, Nilsson SG (2002) A preliminary regional division for efficient biodiversity preservation based on disturbance regime, forest history and tree species distribution: the southern Swedish example. In: Björk L, ed. Sustainable Forestry in Temperate Regions, Proceedings of the SUFOR International Workshop April 7-9, 2002 Lund, Sweden: Department of Chemical Engineering II, Lund University. pp 131-135.
34. Robertson HM, Gadau J, Wanner KW (2010) The insect chemoreceptor superfamily of the parasitoid jewel wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Insect Molecular Biology 19: 121-136.
35. Bichão H, Borg-Karlson A-K, Wibe A, Araújo J, Mustaparta H (2005) Molecular receptive ranges of olfactory receptor neurones responding selectively to terpenoids, aliphatic green leaf volatiles and aromatic compounds, in the strawberry blossom weevil Anthonomus rubi. Chemoecology 15: 211-226.
36. Røstelien T, Borg-Karlson A-K, Mustaparta H (2000) Selective receptor neurone responses to E-b-ocimene, b-myrcene, E,E-a-farnesene and homofarnesene in the moth Heliothis virescens, identified by gas chromatography linked to electrophysiology. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 186: 833-847.
37. Wibe A, Mustaparta H (1996) Encoding of plant odours by receptor neurons in the pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) studied by linked gas chromatographyelectrophysiology. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 179: 331-344.
38. Hansson BS, Larsson MC, Leal WS (1999) Green leaf volatile-detecting olfactory receptor neurones display very high sensitivity and specificity in a scarab beetle. Physiological Entomology 24: 121-126.
39. Schröder R, Hilker M (2008) The relevance of background odor in resource location by insects: A behavioral approach. Bio Science 58: 308-316.
40. Zhang QH, Tolasch T, Schlyter F, Francke W (2002) Enantiospecific antennal response of bark beetles to spiroacetal (E)-conophthorin. Journal of Chemical Ecology 28: 1839-1852.
41. Schlyter F, Zhang QH, Anderson P, Byers JA, Wadhams LJ, et al. (2000) Electrophysiological and behavioural responses of Tomicus piniperda and Tomicus minor (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to non-host leaf and bark volatiles. Canadian Entomologist 132: 965-981.
42. Ogunwande IA, Essien EE, Ogunbinu AO, Adebayo M, Kariot A, et al. (2008) Essential oil constituents of Klainedoxa gabonensis Pierre ex Engl (Irvingiaceae), Brachystegia nigerica Hoyle et A. Jones (Caesalpinioideae) and Acalypha segetalis (Nuell.) Arg., (Euphorbiaceae). Journal of Essential Oil Research 20: 211-215.
43. Fäldt J, Jonsell M, Nordlander G, Borg-Karlson A-K (1999) Volatiles of bracket fungi Fomitopsis pinicola and Fomes fomentarius and their functions as insect attractants. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25: 567-590.
44. Kaminski E, Stawicki S, Wasowicz E, Kasperek M (1980) Volatile odour substances produced by microflora. Nahrung 24: 103-113.
45. Rapior S, Marion C, Pelissier Y, Bessiere JM (1997) Volatile composition of fourteen speices of fresh wild mushrooms (Boletales). Journal of Essential Oil Research 9: 231-234.
46. Pierce AM, Pierce HD, Borden JH, Oehlschlager AC (1991) Fungal volatiles: Semiochemicals for stored-product beetles (Coleoptera: Cucujidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 17: 581-597.
47. Hall DR, Beevor PS, Cork A, Nesbitt BF, Vale GA (1984) 1-Octen-3-ol: a potent olfactory stimulant and attractant for tsetse isolated from cattle odours. Insect Sci Appl 5: 335-339.
48. Anjou K, Von Sydow E (1967) The aroma of cranberries. II. Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait. Acta Chemica Scandinavica 21: 2076.
49. Buttery RG, Seifert RM, Ling LC (1975) Characterization of some volatile constituents of dry red beans. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 23: 516-519.
50. Díaz-Maroto MC, Castillo N, Castro-Vázquez L, Angel Gonzalez-Vinas M, Pérez-Coello MS (2007) Volatile composition and olfactory profile of pennyroyal (Mentha pulegium L.) plants. Flavour and Fragrance Journal 22: 114-118.
51. Lee SJ, Umano K, Shibamoto T, Lee KG (2005) Identification of volatile components in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) and thyme leaves (Thymus vulgaris L.) and their antioxidant properties. Food Chemistry 91: 131-137.
52. Maffei M, Codignola A, Fieschi M (1986) Essential oil from Mentha spicata L.(spearmint) cultivated in Italy. Flavour and Fragrance Journal 1: 105-109.
53. Kohnle U, Vité JP (1984) Bark beetle predators: strategies in the olfactory perception of prey species by clerid and trogositid beetles. Zeitschrift für angewandte Entomologie 98: 504-508.
54. Erbilgin N, Raffa KF (2001) Kairomonal range of generalist predators in specialized habitats: responses to multiple phloeophagous species emitting pheromones vs. host odors. Entomologia Experimentalis & Applicata 99: 205-210.
55. Steidle JLM, van Loon JJA (2003) Dietary specialization and infochemical use in carnivorous arthropods: testing a concept. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 108: 133-148.
56. Monteith LG (1960) Influence of plants other than the food plants on their host on host-finding by Tachinid parasites. Canadian Entomologist 92: 641-652.
57. Richards OW (1940) The biology of the small white butterfly (Pieris rapae), with special reference to the factors controlling its abundance. Journal of Animal Ecology 9: 243-288.
58. Powell W, Wright AF (1991) The influence of host food plants on host recognition by four aphidiine parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 81: 449-453.
59. Gohole LS, Overholt WA, Khan ZR, Vet LEM (2003) Role of volatiles emitted by host and non-host plants in the foraging behaviour of Dentichasmias busseolae, a pupal parasitoid of the spotted stemborer Chilo partellus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 107: 1-9.
60. Zhang QH, Erbilgin N, Seybold SJ (2008) GC-EAD responses to semiochemicals by eight beetles in the subcortical community associated with Monterey pine trees in coastal California: similarities and disparities across three trophic levels. Chemoecology 18: 243-254.
61. Raffa KF, Klepzig KD (1989) Chiral escape of bark beetles from predators responding to a bark beetle pheromone. Oecologia 80: 566-569.
62. Herms DA, Haack RA, Ayres BD (1991) Variation in semiochemical-mediated prey-predator interaction - Ips pini (Scolytidae) and Thanasimus dubius (Cleridae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 17: 515-524.
63. Aukema BH, Raffa KF (2000) Chemically mediated predator-free space: Herbivores can synergize intraspecific communication without increasing risk of predation. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26: 1923-1939.
64. Seybold SJ, Teale SA, Wood DL, Zhang A, Webster FX, et al. (1992) The role of lanierone in the chemical ecology of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in California. Journal of Chemical Ecology 18: 2305-2329.
65. Kelley ST, Farrell BD (1998) Is specialization a dead end? The phylogeny of host use in Dendroctonus bark beetles (Scolytidae). Evolution 52: 1731-1743.
66. Sequeira AS, Farrell BD (2001) Evolutionary origins of Gondwanan interactions: How old are Araucaria beetle herbivores? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 74: 459-474.
67. Zhang QH, Schlyter F, Anderson P (1999) Green leaf volatiles interrupt pheromone response of spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25: 2847-2861.
68. Zhang QH, Liu GT, Schlyter F, Birgersson G, Anderson P, et al. (2001) Olfactory responses of Ips duplicatus from inner Mongolia, China to nonhost leaf and bark volatiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27: 995-1009.
69. Schlyter F, Löfqvist J, Jakuš R (1995) Green leaf volatiles and verbenone modify attraction of European Tomicus, Hylurgops, and Ips bark beetles. In: Hain FP, Salom SS, Ravlin WF, Payne TL, Raffa KF, eds. Behavior, Population Dynamics, and Control of Forest Insects, Proceedings of a Joint IUFRO Working Party Conference - February 1994. Wooster: Ohio State Univ., OARDC. pp 29-44.
70. Schlyter F, Svensson M, Zhang QH, Knízek M, Krokene P, et al. (2001) A model for peak and width of signaling windows: Ips duplicatus and Chilo partellus pheromone component proportions - Does response have a wider window than production? J Chem Ecol 27: 1481-1511.
71. Byers JA, Lanne BS, Schlyter F, Löfqvist J, Bergström G (1985) Olfactory recognition of host-tree susceptibility by pine shoot beetles. Naturwissenschaften 72: 324-326.
72. Byers JA, Zhang QH, Birgersson G (2004) Avoidance of nonhost plants by a bark beetle, Pityogenes bidentatus, in a forest of odors. Naturwissenschaften 91: 215-219.
73. Day RW, Quinn GP (1989) Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecological Monographs 59: 433-463.
74. Reeve JD, Strom BL (2004) Statistical problems encountered in trapping studies of scolytids and associated insects. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30: 1575-1590.
75. Nakagawa S, Cuthill I (2007) Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews 82: 591-605.
76. Hedges L, Olkin I (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando: Academic Press. 369 p.