Dose relations between goal setting, theory-based correlates of goal setting and increases in physical activity during a workplace trial

Health Education Research

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 620-631

  Dishman, Rod K ^a   Vandenberg, Robert J ^b   Motl, Robert W ^c   Wilson, Mark G ^a   Dejoy, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHNIC GROUP; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CONCEPT; WORKPLACE;

ADULT; COHORT STUDIES; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; ETHNIC GROUPS; EXERCISE; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SELF EFFICACY; WORKPLACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955252837     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyp042     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. Washington, DC, 2000.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of regular physical activity among adults-United States, 2001 and 2005. MMWR 2007; 56: 1209-1212
3. Barnes P. Physical Activity Among Adults: United States, 2000 and 2005. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, 2007. Available at: http:// www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/physicalac- tivity/physicalactivity.htm. Accessed: 11 November 2008.
4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Washington, DC, 2008.
5. Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. Am Psychol 2002; 57: 705-717
6. Shilts MK, Horowitz M, Townsend MS. Goal setting as a strategy for dietary and physical activity behavior change: a review of the literature. Am J Health Promot 2004; 19: 81-93.
7. Durlak JA. Why program implementation is important. In: Durlak J, Ferrari J (eds). Program Implementation in Preventive Trials. Philadelphia, PA: Haworth Press, 1998, 5-18.
8. Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA et al. Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues. Health Educ Res 2006; 21: 688-694
9. Dishman RK, Oldenburg B, O'Neal H et al. Worksite physical activity interventions. Am J Prev Med 1998; 15: 344-361
10. Kahn EB, Ramsey LT, Brownson RC et al. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2002; 22(Suppl.): 73-107.
11. Hillsdon M, Foster C, Thorogood M. Interventions for promoting physical activity.Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (1): CD003180.
12. Dishman RK, DeJoy DM, Wilson MG et al. Move to improve: a randomized workplace trial to increase physical activity. Am J Prev Med 2008; 36: 133-141
13. Wilson MG, Basta T, Bynum B et al. Do intervention fidelity and dose influence outcomes? Results from the Move to Improve worksite physical activity program. Health Educ Res 2009.
14. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav 2004; 31: 143-164
15. MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS. Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol 2007; 58: 593-614.
16. Kraemer HC, Stice E, Kazdin A et al. How do risk factors work together? Mediators, moderators, and independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors. Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158: 848-856.
17. Dishman RK, Motl RW, Saunders R et al. Self-efficacy partially mediates the effect of a school-based physical-activity intervention among adolescent girls. Prev Med 2004; 38: 628-636
18. Burke V, BeilinLJ, Cutt HE etal. Moderators and mediators of behaviour change in a lifestyle program for treated hypertensives: a randomized controlled trial (ADAPT). Health Educ Res 2008; 23: 583-591 (Pubitemid 351989706)
19. Dishman RK, Saunders RP, Motl RW et al. Self-efficacy moderates the relation between declines in physical activity and perceived social support in high school girls. J Pediatr Psychol 2008; 34: 441-451
20. Aittasalo M, Miilunpalo S, Suni J. The effectiveness of physical activity counseling in a work-site setting. A randomized, controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 55: 193-202.
21. Richardson CR, Mehari KS, Mclntyre LG et al. A randomized trial comparing structured and lifestyle goals in an internet-mediated walking program for people with type 2 diabetes. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2007; 4: 59.
22. Talbot LA, Gaines JM, Huynh TN et al. A home-based pedometer-driven walking program to increase physical activity in older adults with osteoarthritis of the knee: a preliminary study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003; 51: 387-392
23. Cole G, Leonard B, Hammond S et al. Using ''stages of behavioral change'' constructs to measure the short-term effects of a worksite-based intervention to increase moderate physical activity. Psychol Rep 1998; 82: 615-618
24. Hammond SL, Leonard B, Fridinger F. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director's Physical Activity Challenge: an evaluation of a worksite health promotion intervention.Am J Health Promot 2000; 15: 17-20, ii.
25. Tudor-Locke C, Basset DR. How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Med 2004; 34: 1-8.
26. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR et al. American College of Sports Medicine; American Heart Association. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation 2007; 116: 1081-1093
27. Welk GJ, Differding JA, Thompson RW et al. The utility of the Digi-walker step counter to assess daily physical activity patterns. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: S481-8.
28. Tudor-Locke C, Williams JE, Reis JP et al. Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: convergent validity. Sports Med 2002; 32: 795-808.
29. Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the management invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Org Res Methods 2000; 3: 4-69.
30. Muthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus User's Guide. 5th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen and Muthen, 1998-2007.
31. Enders CK, Bandalos DL. The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Struct Equat Model 2001; 8: 430-457.
32. Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
33. Bollen KA, Curran PJ. Latent curve models. A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. (pp 1-273), 2006.
34. Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley and Sons. (pp 1-514), 1989.
35. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covari-ance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equat Model 1999; 6: 1-55.
36. Kaplan D, George R. A study of power associated with testing factor mean differences under violations of factorial invariance structural equation modeling. Struct Equat Model 1993; 2: 101-118
37. Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG et al. CONSORT Group. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 295-309. (Pubitemid 351665487)
38. Lewis BA, Marcus BH, Pate RR et al. Psychosocial mediators of physical activity behavior among adults and children. Am J Prev Med 2002; 23(Suppl.): 26-35.