A comparison of three different attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: One-year report

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 209-218

  Kleis, Wilfried K ^a   Kämmerer, Peer W ^a   Hartmann, Sinsa ^a   Al Nawas, Bilal ^a   Wagner, Wilfried ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Abutment; Attachment system; Dental implant; Edentulous mandible; Locator; Prospective; Randomized; Self aligning attachment system; Traditional ball attachment

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HEALTH; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE PRECISION ATTACHMENT; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, COMPLETE, LOWER; DENTURE, OVERLAY; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL HEALTH; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77955243490     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00154.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Shor A, Goto Y, Shor K. Mandibular two-implant-retained overdenture: prosthetic design and fabrication protocol. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007, 28:80-88. quiz
2. MacEntee MI, Walton JN, Glick N. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results. J Prosthet Dent 2005, 93:28-37.
3. Wright PS. Two implants for all edentulous mandibles. Br Dent J 2006, 200:469.
4. Kimoto K, Garrett NR. Effect of mandibular ridge height on masticatory performance with mandibular conventional and implant-assisted overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003, 18:523-530.
5. Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, Feine JS. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont 2003, 16:117-122.
6. Boerrigter EM, Geertman ME, Van Oort RP. Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants - a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995, 33:282-288.
7. Esfandiari S, Lund JP, Penrod JR, Savard A, Mark Thomason J, Feine JS. Implant overdentures for edentulous elders: study of patient preference. Gerodontology 2008, Epub ahead of print
8. Geertman ME, Boerrigter EM, van't Hof MA. Overdenture prostheses on implants versus complete dentures. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 1998, 105:174-177.
9. Heydecke G, Thomason JM, Lund JP, Feine JS. The impact of conventional and implant supported prostheses on social and sexual activities in edentulous adults: results from a randomized trial 2 months after treatment. J Dent 2005, 33:649-657.
10. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van't Hof MA. Comparison of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures: a 10-year prospective study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003, 18:879-885.
11. Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, van't Hof MA. Implant-retained overdentures compared with complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. A prospective study followed over 10 years. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2005, 112:7-12.
12. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24-25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002, 17:601-602.
13. Davis DM, Packer ME. Mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants with either ball attachments or magnets: 5-year results. Int J Prosthodont 1999, 12:222-229.
14. Gotfredsen K, Holm B. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthodont 2000, 13:125-130.
15. van Kampen F, Cune M, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003, 14:720-726.
16. Walton JN. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol. Int J Prosthodont 2003, 16:255-260.
17. Krennmair G, Weinlander M, Krainhofner M, Piehslinger E. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2006, 19:164-170.
18. Schneider AL, Kurtzman GM. Bar overdentures utilizing the Locator attachment. Gen Dent 2001, 49:210-214.
19. Schneider AL, Kurtzman GM. Restoration of divergent free-standing implants in the maxilla. J Oral Implantol 2002, 28:113-116.
20. Chung KH, Chung CY, Cagna DR, Cronin RJ. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures. J Prosthodont 2004, 13:221-226.
21. Ochiai KT, Williams BH, Hojo S, Nishimura R, Caputo AA. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs. J Prosthet Dent 2004, 91:421-427.
22. Celik G, Uludag B. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2007, 97:229-235.
23. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Clin Oral Investig 2003, 7:2-7.
24. Al-Jundi MA, Szentpetery A, John MT. An Arabic version of the Oral Health Impact Profile: translation and psychometric properties. Int Dent J 2007, 57:84-92.
25. John MT, Patrick DL, Slade GD. The German version of the Oral Health Impact Profile - translation and psychometric properties. Eur J Oral Sci 2002, 110:425-433.
26. Yamazaki M, Inukai M, Baba K, John MT. Japanese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-J). J Oral Rehabil 2007, 34:159-168.
27. Awad MA, Locker D, Korner-Bitensky N, Feine JS. Measuring the effect of intra-oral implant rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res 2000, 79:1659-1663.
28. Cune MS, van Kampen FM, van der Bilt A. Patient satisfaction with different types of implant-retained overdentures in the edentate mandible. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2006, 113:401-407.
29. Timmerman R, Stoker GT, Wismeijer D, Oosterveld P, Vermeeren JI, van Waas MA. An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of participant satisfaction with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Dent Res 2004, 83:630-633.
30. Naert I, Alsaadi G, Quirynen M. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2004, 17:401-410.
31. Verhoeven JW, Cune MS, de Putter C. Reliability of some clinical parameters of evaluation in implant dentistry. J Oral Rehabil 2000, 27:211-216.