Understanding the rapid evaluation of innovative ideas in the early stages of design

International Journal of Product Development

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 67-83

  Ferioli, Marcelo ^a,d,e   Dekoninck, Elies ^b   Culley, Steve ^b   Roussel, Benoît ^a,e   Renaud, Jean ^c,f  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^b University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

^c INSA DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^f French National Association on Project Management   (France)

Author keywords

Design; Early stages; Evaluating ideas; Innovation; NPD process; Screening ideas

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955186220     PISSN: 14779056     EISSN: 17418178     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJPD.2010.034313     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cooper, R.G. (1993) Winning at New Products, 2nd ed., Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
2. Cooper, R.G. (2008) 'The stage-gate idea- to-launch process-update, what's new and NexGen Systems', J. Product Innovation Management, May, Vol.25, No.3, pp.213-232.
3. Diaz de Leon, E. (2004) 'Tangible vs intangible criteria in investment decision making - an empirical approach', IAMOT, Washington, DC.
4. Freeman, J., Avons, S.E., Pearson, D.E. and Ijsselsteijn, W.A. (1999) 'Effects of sensory information and prior experience on direct subjective ratings of presence', Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Vol.8, pp.1-13.
5. Godbillon, B.C. (2003) Subjective Evaluation, Ambiguity and Relational Contracts, Europlace Institut of Finance (EIF), July.
6. Lee, J. and Todd, R. (2006) 'Developing and selecting ideas, design methods, design and technology', News & Views, Sheffield Hallam University, No.14, ISSN: 1743-3290.
7. Maxant, O. (2004) 'La collaboration interdisciplinaire et la contextualisation par l'usage dans la création et l'évaluation amont d'offres innovantes: application au domaine de l'énergie domestique', Thèse de Doctorat, Ecole Nationale Supérieure en Génie des Systèmes Industriels.
8. Neuendorf, K.A. (2002) The Content Analysis Guidebook, 6th ed., Illustrated, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, ISBN: 0761919783, 9780761919780.
9. Nielsen, J. (1993) Usability Engineering, Boston: Academic Press, ISBN: 0-12-518406-9.
10. OECD (2005) 'Guidelines for collecting an interpreting innovation data', Oslo Manual, 3rd ed., Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy, European Commission, OECD: OECD Publishing.
11. Ozer, M. (1999) 'A survey of new product evaluation models', Journal of Product Innovation Management, January, Blackwell Publishing, Vol.16, No.1, pp.77-94.
12. Ozer, M. (2002) What Do We Know About New Product Idea Selection?, Center for Innovation Management Studies (CIMS), Raleigh, North Carolina.
13. Ozer, M. (2004) 'Managing the selection process for new product ideas', Research-Technology Management, Industrial Research Institute, Inc., 1 July, Vol.47, No.4, pp.10-11.
14. Reinertsen, D.G. (1999) 'Taking the fuzziness out of the fuzzy front end', Research z Technology Management, November-December, pp.25-31.
15. Snelson, P.A. and Hart, S.J. (1991) 'Product policy: perspectives on success', in M.J. Baker (Ed.) Perspectives on Marketing Management, Vol.1, pp.193-225.
16. Ullman, D.G. (1992) The Mechanical Design Process, New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.
17. Wohlin, C. and Andrews, A.A. (2001) 'Assessing project success using subjective evaluation factors', Software Quality Journal, Vol.9, No.1, pp.43-70.
18. Zeng, X. and Koehl, L. (2003) 'Representation of the subjective evaluation of the fabric hand using fuzzy techniques', International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol.18, No.3, pp.355-366.