|
Volumn 128, Issue 1, 2010, Pages
|
Differences in distortion product otoacoustic emission phase recorded from human neonates using two popular probes
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS;
FREQUENCY RANGES;
FUNCTION OF FREQUENCY;
HIGH FREQUENCY;
ACOUSTIC EMISSIONS;
PHASE SHIFT;
PROBES;
ADULT;
AGE;
AMPLIFIER;
ARTICLE;
AUDITORY STIMULATION;
CALIBRATION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE;
FEMALE;
HEARING LOSS;
HEARING TEST;
HUMAN;
INSTRUMENTATION;
MALE;
NEWBORN;
NEWBORN SCREENING;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
PREDICTION AND FORECASTING;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SIGNAL PROCESSING;
SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION;
STANDARD;
UNITED STATES;
DEVICES;
PREDICTIVE VALUE;
STANDARDS;
ACOUSTIC STIMULATION;
ADULT;
AGE FACTORS;
AMPLIFIERS, ELECTRONIC;
CALIBRATION;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM;
FEMALE;
HEARING LOSS;
HEARING TESTS;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
LOS ANGELES;
MALE;
NEONATAL SCREENING;
OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
|
EID: 77955177633
PISSN: 00014966
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1121/1.3453415 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (11)
|