Reference place conditioning procedure with cocaine: Increased sensitivity for measuring associatively motivated choice behavior in rats

Behavioural Pharmacology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 323-331

  Reichel, Carmela M ^a   Wilkinson, Jamie L ^a   Bevins, Rick A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

conditioned place preference; learning; Pavlovian drug conditioning; rat; stimulant abuse

Indexed keywords

COCAINE; PLACEBO;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; MALE; MOTIVATION; NONHUMAN; PLACE CONDITIONING; RAT; REWARD; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSITIZATION; ANIMAL; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECTS; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; INTRAPERITONEAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; STANDARD;

ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COCAINE; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; INJECTIONS, INTRAPERITONEAL; MALE; MOTIVATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REWARD;

EID: 77955177121     PISSN: 09558810     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e32833b110b     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bardo M, Bevins R (2000). Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward? Psychopharmacology 153:31-43.
2. Bardo M, Rowlett J, Harris M (1995). Conditioned place preference using opiate and stimulant drugs: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 19:39-51.
3. Barr G, Paredes W, Bridger W (1985). Place conditioning with morphine and phencyclidine: dose dependent effects. Life Sci 36:363-368.
4. Bevins R (2005). The reference-dose place conditioning procedure yields a graded dose-effect function. Int J Comp Psychol 18:101-111.
5. Bevins R, Palmatier M (2004). Extending the role of associative learning processes in nicotine addiction. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 3:143-158.
6. Bevins R, Cunningham C (2006). Place conditioning: a methodological analysis. In: Anderson M, editor. Tasks and techniques: a sampling of methodologies for the investigation of animal learning, behavior, and cognition. Hauppauge, New York: Nova Science Publisher; pp. 99-110.
7. Bolles R (1975). Theory of motivation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.
8. Carr G, Phillips A, Fibiger H (1988). Independence of amphetamine reward from locomotor stimulation demonstrated by conditioned place preference. Psychopharmacology 94:221-226.
9. Corbit L, Balleine B (2005). Double dissociation of basolateral and central amygdala lesions on the general and outcome-specific forms of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer. J Neurosci 25:962-970.
10. Costanza R, Barber D, Terry P (2001). Antagonism of the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine at two training doses by dopamine D2-like receptor antagonists. Psychopharmacology 158:146-153.
11. Delamater A, Holland P (2008). The influence of CS-US interval on several different indices of learning in appetitive conditioning. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 34:202-222.
12. Di Chiara G (1999). Drug addiction as dopamine-dependent associative learning disorder. Eur J Pharmacol 375:13-30.
13. Ehrman R, Robbins S, Childress A, O'Brien C (1992). Conditioned responses to cocaine-related stimuli in cocaine abuse patients. Psychopharmacology 107:523-529.
14. Groblewski P, Bax L, Cunningham C (2008). Reference-dose place conditioning with ethanol in mice: empirical and theoretical analysis. Psychopharmacology 201:97-106.
15. Kilts C, Schweitzer J, Quinn C, Gross R, Faber T, Muhammad F, et al. (2001). Neural activity related to drug craving in cocaine addiction. Arch Gen Psychiatry 58:334-341.
16. Konorski J (1967). Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Koob G, Le Moal M (2001). Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward, and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology 24:97-129.
17. Martin-Iverson MT, Reimer AR (1996). Classically conditioned motor effects do not occur with cocaine in an unbiased conditioned place preferences procedure. Behav Pharmacol 7:303-314.
18. Mattson B, Williams S, Rosenblatt J, Morrell J (2001). Comparison of two positive reinforcing stimuli: pups and cocaine throughout the postpartum period. Behav Neurosci 115:683-694.
19. Mueller D, Stewart J (2000). Cocaine-induced conditioned place preference: reinstatement by priming injections of cocaine after extinction. Behav Brain Res 115:39-47.
20. O'Dell L, Khroyan T, Neisewander J (1996). Dose-dependent characterization of the rewarding and stimulant properties of cocaine following intraperitoneal and intravenous administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 123:144-153.
21. Panksepp J, Nocjar C, Burgdorf J, Panksepp J, Huber R (2004). The role of emotional systems in addiction: a neuroethological perspective. In: Bevins RA, Bardo MT, editors. Motivational factors in the etiology of drug abuse: volume 50 of the nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Press; pp. 85-126.
22. Parker LA (1992). Place conditioning in a three-or four-choice apparatus: role of stimulus novelty in drug-induced place conditioning. Behav Neurosci 106:294-306.
23. Reichel C, Bevins R (2008). Competition between the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine and novelty. Behav Neurosci 122:140-150.
24. Reichel C, Bevins R (2010). Competition between novelty and cocaine conditioned reward is sensitive to drug dose and retention interval. Behav Neurosci 124:141-151.
25. Rescorla R, Wagner A (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In: Black AH, Prokasky WF, editors. Classical Conditioning II. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; pp. 64-99.
26. Robbins S, Ehrman R, Childress A, O'Brien C (1997). Relationships among physiological and self-report responses produced by cocaine-related cues. Addict Behav 22:157-167.
27. Robinson T, Berridge K (2001). Incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction 96:103-114.
28. Russo S, Jenab S, Fabian S, Festa E, Kemen L, Quinones-Jenab V (2003). Sex differences in the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine. Brain Res 970:214-220.
29. Sell L, Morris J, Bearn J, Frackowiak R, Friston K, Dolan R (2000). Neural responses associated with cue evoked emotional states and heroin in opiate addicts. Drug Alcohol Depend 60:207-216.
30. Shippenberg T, Heidbreder C (1995). Sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine: pharmacological and temporal characteristics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 273:808-815.
31. Tzschentke T (1998). Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference paradigm: a comprehensive review of drug effects, recent progress and new issues. Prog Neurobiol 56:613-672.
32. Tzschentke T (2007). Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm: update of the last decade. Addict Biol 12: 227-462.
33. Wise R, Wang B, You Z (2008). Cocaine serves as a peripheral interoceptive conditioned stimulus for central glutamate and dopamine release. PLoS One 3:(e2846)1-(e2846)9.