The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: Report of the first 551 patients

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 252, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 263-270

  Lehmann, Kai S ^a   Ritz, Jörg P ^a   Wibmer, Andreas ^a   Gellert, Klaus ^b   Zornig, Carsten ^c   Burghardt, Jens ^d   Büsing, Martin ^e   Runkel, Norbert ^f   Kohlhaw, Kay ^g   Albrecht, Roland ^h   Kirchner, Tom G ⁱ   Arlt, Georg ^j   Mall, Julian W ^k   Butters, Michael ^l   Bulian, Dirk R ^m   Bretschneider, Jörgen ⁿ   Holmer, Christoph ^a   Buhr, Heinz J ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b SANA KLINIKUM OFFENBACH   (Germany)

^c ISRAELITISCHES KRANKENHAUS   (Germany)

^d Department of Surgery   (Germany)

^e Klinikum Vest   (Germany)

^f SCHWARZWALD BAAR KLINIKUM   (Germany)

^g HELIOS Klinikum Borna   (Germany)

^h HELIOS Klinikum Aue   (Germany)

ⁱ Department of Surgery   (Germany)

^j Park Klinik Weissensee   (Germany)

^k Department of Surgery   (Germany)

^l Krankenhaus Bietigheim   (Germany)

^m UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

ⁿ Asklepios Klinik Weißenfels   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; AGING; APPENDICITIS; APPENDIX; ARTICLE; BARIATRIC SURGERY; BODY MASS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COLON; DATA BASE; ENDOSCOPE; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER; GERMANY; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; OBESITY; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TARGET ORGAN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ABDOMEN; ADULT; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REGISTRIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; VAGINA;

EID: 77955172145     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e6240f     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Rogers DA, Elstein AS, Bordage G. Improving continuing medical education for surgical techniques: applying the lessons learned in the first decade of minimal access surgery. Ann Surg. 2001;233:159-166.
2. Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullarton GM; West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group. Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. Br J Surg. 1996;83:1356-1360.
3. Hawasli A, Lloyd LR. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The learning curve: report of 50 patients. Am Surg. 1991;57:542-544.
4. Lee VS, Chari RS, Cucchiaro G, et al. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1993;165:527-532.
5. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, et al. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg. 1993;165:9-14.
6. Jones DB, Soper NJ. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Annu Rev Med. 1996;47:31-44.
7. Moore MJ, Bennett CL. The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystec-tomy. The Southern Surgeons Club. Am J Surg. 1995;170:55-59.
8. Soot SJ, Eshraghi N, Farahmand M, et al. Transition from open to laparo-scopic fundoplication: the learning curve. Arch Surg. 1999;134:278-281.
9. Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Maass H, et al. A prospective randomized study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting. Ann Surg. 2005;241:442-449.
10. Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W, et al. Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg. 2003;237:460-469.
11. Flora ED, Wilson TG, Martin IJ, et al. A review of natural orifice translu-menal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for intra-abdominal surgery: experimental models, techniques, and applicability to the clinical setting. Ann Surg. 2008;247:583-602.
12. Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, et al. Flexible transgastric peritoneos-copy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:114-117.
13. Zornig C, Emmermann A, von Waldenfels HA, et al. Laparoscopic chole-cystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach. Endoscopy. 2007;39:913-915.
14. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, et al. Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg. 2007;142:823-826.
15. Zornig C, Mofid H, Siemssen L, et al. Transvaginal NOTES hybrid chole-cystectomy: feasibility results in 68 cases with mid-term follow-up. Endos-copy. 2009;41:391-394.
16. Ramos AC, Murakami A, Galvao NM, et al. NOTES transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy: first series. Endoscopy. 2008;40:572-575.
17. Noguera J, Dolz C, Cuadrado A, et al. Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy, NOTES, and minilaparoscopy: analysis of a prospective clinical series. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:876-881.
18. Lyratzopoulos G, Patrick H, Campbell B. Registers needed for new interven-tional procedures. Lancet. 2008;371:1734-1736.
19. Navarra G, Rando L, La MG, et al. Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy: a novel approach. Am J Surg. 2009;197:e69-e72.
20. Zorron R, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, et al. NOTES transvaginal cholecystec-tomy: preliminary clinical application. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:542-547.
21. Rosen M, Brody F, Ponsky J. Predictive factors for conversion of laparo-scopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:254-258.
22. Livingston EH, Rege RV. A nationwide study of conversion from laparo-scopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2004;188:205-211.
23. Tang B, Cuschieri A. Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1081-1091.
24. Ammori BJ, Vezakis A, Davides D, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in morbidly obese patients. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:1336-1339.
25. Mascie-Taylor CG, Goto R. Human variation and body mass index: a review of the universality of BMI cut-offs, gender and urban-rural differences, and secular changes. J Physiol Anthropol. 2007;26:109-112.
26. Kaya IO, Ozkardes A, Ozdemir F, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly people: does advanced age present any risk for conversion? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:962-963.
27. Kim HO, Yun JW, Shin JH, et al. Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not influenced by chronological age in the elderly. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:722-726.