-
1
-
-
0347360105
-
-
Dignity is a Useless Concept. Br Med J
-
R. Macklin. Dignity is a Useless Concept. Br Med J2003; 327: 1419-1420.
-
(2003)
, vol.327
, pp. 419-1420
-
-
Macklin, R.1
-
2
-
-
77955993953
-
-
2000. Is There a Tension Between Autonomy and Dignity? In Bioethics and Biolaw: Four Ethical Principles
-
H. Kuhse. 2000. Is There a Tension Between Autonomy and Dignity? In Bioethics and Biolaw, Vol. II: Four Ethical Principles
-
, vol.2
-
-
Kuhse, H.1
-
3
-
-
77955990513
-
-
eds. Copenhagen: Rhodos International Science and Art Publishers and Centre for Ethics and Law
-
P. Kemp, J. Rendtorff & N. Mattson Johansen, eds. Copenhagen: Rhodos International Science and Art Publishers and Centre for Ethics and Law: 61-74.
-
-
-
Kemp, P.1
-
4
-
-
77956006706
-
-
The Stupidity of Dignity. The New Republic 28 May
-
S. Pinker. 2008. The Stupidity of Dignity. The New Republic 28 May.
-
(2008)
-
-
Pinker, S.1
-
5
-
-
77956001836
-
-
op. cit. note 1.
-
Macklin, op. cit. note 1.
-
-
-
Macklin1
-
6
-
-
77955988287
-
-
Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press
-
D. Beyleveld & R. Brownsword. 2001. Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 63
-
(2001)
, pp. 63
-
-
Beyleveld, D.1
-
7
-
-
43949134922
-
-
Dignity: Two Riddles and Four Concepts. Camb Q Healthc Ethics
-
D. Schroeder. Dignity: Two Riddles and Four Concepts. Camb Q Healthc Ethics2008; 17: 230-238: 237.
-
(2008)
, vol.17
, pp. 230-238
-
-
Schroeder, D.1
-
8
-
-
77956003328
-
-
For attempts at clarification in this spirit see Beyleveld & Brownsword, op. cit. note
-
For attempts at clarification in this spirit see Beyleveld & Brownsword, op. cit. note 5
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
77955992693
-
-
Another Look at Dignity. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2004; 13: 7-14; L. Nordenfelt. The Varieties of Dignity. Health Care Anal
-
M. Hayry. Another Look at Dignity. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2004; 13: 7-14; L. Nordenfelt. The Varieties of Dignity. Health Care Anal 2004; 12: 69-81
-
(2004)
, vol.12
, pp. 69-81
-
-
Hayry, M.1
-
10
-
-
33644841373
-
-
Making Sense of Dignity. J Med Ethics
-
R.E. Ashcroft. Making Sense of Dignity. J Med Ethics2005; 31: 679-682
-
(2005)
, vol.31
, pp. 679-682
-
-
Ashcroft, R.E.1
-
11
-
-
58849128780
-
-
Clarifying Appeals to Dignity in Medical Ethics from an Historical Perspective. Bioethics
-
Schroeder, op. cit. note 5; R. Van Der Graaf & J.J.M. Van Delden. Clarifying Appeals to Dignity in Medical Ethics from an Historical Perspective. Bioethics 2009; 23: 151-160.
-
(2009)
, vol.23
, pp. 151-160
-
-
Schroeder1
-
12
-
-
77955995464
-
-
This understanding is identified by Nordenfelt, op. cit. note 6; Schroeder, op. cit. note 5; and Beyleveld & Brownsword, op. cit. note
-
This understanding is identified by Nordenfelt, op. cit. note 6; Schroeder, op. cit. note 5; and Beyleveld & Brownsword, op. cit. note 5.
-
, Issue.5
-
-
-
13
-
-
77956005613
-
-
op. cit. note
-
Schroeder, op. cit. note 5, p. 234.
-
, Issue.5
, pp. 234
-
-
Schroeder1
-
14
-
-
77956008953
-
-
op. cit. note 5; Nordenfelt, op. cit. note 6.
-
Beyleveld & Brownsword, op. cit. note 5; Nordenfelt, op. cit. note 6.
-
-
-
Beyleveld1
-
15
-
-
77956009085
-
-
This type of dignity is identified by Lennart Nordenfelt as 'dignity of menschenwürde' in Nordenfelt, op. cit. note
-
This type of dignity is identified by Lennart Nordenfelt as 'dignity of menschenwürde' in Nordenfelt, op. cit. note 6, pp. 77-78.
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
77956004969
-
-
United Nations. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Reprinted in 2006. International Human Rights Documents
-
United Nations. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Reprinted in 2006. International Human Rights Documents
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
77956004538
-
-
ed., 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press
-
P.R. Ghandi, ed., 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 21-25.
-
-
-
Ghandi, P.R.1
-
18
-
-
77956005371
-
-
See Hayry, op. cit. note 6; Nordenfelt, op. cit. note
-
See Hayry, op. cit. note 6; Nordenfelt, op. cit. note 6, pp. 71-72
-
, vol.6
, pp. 71-72
-
-
-
19
-
-
77955985648
-
-
op. cit. note 6; and Schroeder, op. cit. note
-
Van Der Graaf & Van Delden, op. cit. note 6; and Schroeder, op. cit. note 5.
-
, vol.5
-
-
Graaf, V.D.1
-
20
-
-
77956005489
-
-
For an understanding of dignity along these lines see, L.R. Kass. 2002. Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity. San Francisco, CA: Encounter Books
-
For an understanding of dignity along these lines see, L.R. Kass. 2002. Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity. San Francisco, CA: Encounter Books: 241-243.
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
77955990157
-
-
Hence we see dignity invoked by both sides in debates over euthanasia.
-
Hence we see dignity invoked by both sides in debates over euthanasia.
-
-
-
-
22
-
-
77955995352
-
-
Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
See M.A. Warren. 1997. Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
(1997)
-
-
Warren, M.A.1
-
23
-
-
77956001055
-
-
This conception is identified in Hayry, op. cit. note 6; Van Der Graaf & Van Delden, op. cit. note 6; Schroeder, op. cit. note 5; and Beyleveld & Brownsword, op. cit. note 5.
-
This conception is identified in Hayry, op. cit. note 6; Van Der Graaf & Van Delden, op. cit. note 6; Schroeder, op. cit. note 5; and Beyleveld & Brownsword, op. cit. note 5.
-
-
-
-
24
-
-
77956004282
-
-
See Kant's discussion of our obligations regarding animals on this distinction. I. Kant. 1963. Lectures on Ethics. L. Infield trans. New York: Harper and Row.
-
See Kant's discussion of our obligations regarding animals on this distinction. I. Kant. 1963. Lectures on Ethics. L. Infield trans. New York: Harper and Row.
-
-
-
-
25
-
-
77955994455
-
-
The notion that the possession of interests is the necessary and sufficient condition for the possession of moral status has been famously advanced by utilitarian thinkers such a Jeremy Bentham and Henry Sidgwick. See also P. Singer. 1995. Animal Liberation. 2nd edn. London: Pimlico
-
The notion that the possession of interests is the necessary and sufficient condition for the possession of moral status has been famously advanced by utilitarian thinkers such a Jeremy Bentham and Henry Sidgwick. See also P. Singer. 1995. Animal Liberation. 2nd edn. London: Pimlico: 7-8.
-
-
-
-
26
-
-
84909407579
-
-
See for example the exchange between Axel Kahn and John Harris with regards to the creation of such individuals through cloning as described in J. Harris. 2004. On Cloning. London: Routledge
-
See for example the exchange between Axel Kahn and John Harris with regards to the creation of such individuals through cloning as described in J. Harris. 2004. On Cloning. London: Routledge: 38-42
-
-
-
-
27
-
-
77955994712
-
-
I very much agree with Harris's position.
-
I very much agree with Harris's position.
-
-
-
-
28
-
-
77956007576
-
-
Respect for autonomy is one of the four principles advocated in T.L. Beauchamp & J.F. Childress. 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Respect for autonomy is one of the four principles advocated in T.L. Beauchamp & J.F. Childress. 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
-
-
-
29
-
-
77956000089
-
-
This is the conception least discussed by defenders of dignity. I find this odd, as it seems the most useful to my mind. Nordenfelt's notion of 'dignity of identity' is closely related, however. See Nordenfelt, op. cit. note
-
This is the conception least discussed by defenders of dignity. I find this odd, as it seems the most useful to my mind. Nordenfelt's notion of 'dignity of identity' is closely related, however. See Nordenfelt, op. cit. note 6. pp. 75-76.
-
, vol.6
, pp. 75-76
-
-
-
30
-
-
77956002390
-
-
2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
-
M.C. Nussbaum. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
-
-
-
Nussbaum, M.C.1
-
31
-
-
1542385247
-
-
The importance of self-respect to dignity is highlighted in P. Balzer, K. Rippe & P. Schaber. Two Concepts of Dignity for Humans and Non-human Organisms in the Context of Genetic Engineering. J Agric Environ Ethics
-
The importance of self-respect to dignity is highlighted in P. Balzer, K. Rippe & P. Schaber. Two Concepts of Dignity for Humans and Non-human Organisms in the Context of Genetic Engineering. J Agric Environ Ethics 2000; 13: 7-27.
-
(2000)
, vol.13
, pp. 7-27
-
-
-
32
-
-
77956005990
-
-
Why Daniel James Chose to Die. The Sunday Times 19 October.
-
D. Foggo. 2008. Why Daniel James Chose to Die. The Sunday Times 19 October.
-
(2008)
-
-
Foggo, D.1
-
33
-
-
4544292251
-
-
Nordenfelt, op. cit. note 6; M. Marmot. Dignity and Inequality. The Lancet
-
Nordenfelt, op. cit. note 6; M. Marmot. Dignity and Inequality. The Lancet2004; 364: 1019-1021.
-
(2004)
, vol.364
, pp. 1019-1021
-
-
-
34
-
-
77956003553
-
-
Nussbaum, op. cit. note 22
-
Nussbaum, op. cit. note 22, p. 180.
-
-
-
|