Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Canine Elbow: An Anatomic Study

Veterinary Surgery

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 566-573

  Baeumlin, Yseult ^a   De Rycke, Lieve ^a   Van Caelenberg, Annemie ^a   Van Bree, Henri ^a   Gielen, Ingrid ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; DOG; FORELIMB; HISTOLOGY; HUMERUS; JOINT; LIGAMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIUS; SKELETAL MUSCLE; ULNA; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; VETERINARY;

ANIMALS; DOGS; FORELIMB; HUMERUS; JOINTS; LIGAMENTS, ARTICULAR; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; RADIUS; ULNA;

ANIMALIA; CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 77955159628     PISSN: 01613499     EISSN: 1532950X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00690.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Miller's Anatomy of the Dog 1993, Evans HE. (ed), ed 3, Philadelphia, PA, W. B. Saunders
2. Miller TT. Imaging of elbow disorders. Orthop Clin North Am 1999, 30:21-36.
3. Hill NB, Bucchieri JS, Shon F. Magnetic resonance imaging of injury to the medial collateral ligament of the elbow: a cadaver model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2000, 9:418-422.
4. Van Bree H, Gielen I. Diagnostic imaging in elbow dysplasia: including scintigraphy, radiography, ultrasound, CT and MRI. , Dubl2008, pp 13-17
5. Reichle JK, Snaps FR. The elbow. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 1999, 14:177-186.
6. Snaps FR, Saunders JH, Park RD. Comparison of spin echo, gradient echo and fat saturation magnetic resonance imaging sequences for imaging the canine elbow. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1998, 39:518-523.
7. Janach KJ, Breit SM, Künzel WW. Assessment of the geometry of the cubital (elbow) joint of dogs by use of magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Vet Res 2006, 67:211-218.
8. Snaps FR, Balligand MH, Saunders JH. Comparison of radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and surgical findings in a dog with elbow dysplasia. Am J Vet Res 1997, 58:1367-1370.
9. Harasen G. The mysterious dysplastic elbow. Can Vet J 2003, 44:673-674.
10. Zontine WJ, Weitcamp RA, Lippincott CL. Redefined type of elbow dysplasia involving calcified flexor tendons attached to the medial humeral epicondyle in three dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989, 194:1082-1085.
11. Walker TM. A redefined type of elbow dysplasia in the dog-2 cases. Can Vet J 1998, 39:573-575.
12. Grondalen J, Braut T. Lameness in two young dogs caused by calcified body in the joint capsule of the elbow. J Small Anim Pract 1976, 17:681-684.
13. Baird DK, Hathcock JT, Rumph PF. Low-field magnetic resonance imaging of the normal canine stifle joint: normal anatomy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1998, 39:87-97.
14. Schaefer SL, Forrest LJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the canine shoulder: an anatomical study. Vet Surg 2006, 35:721-728.
15. Nomica Anatomica Veterinaria 1994, 1-198. World Association of Veterinary Anatomists (WAVA)., ed 4, Zurich and Ithaca, NY, International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature, pp
16. De Rycke LM, Gielen IM, van Bree H. Computed tomography of the elbow joint in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 2002, 63:1400-1407.
17. Soler M, Murciano J, Latorre R. Ultrasonographic, computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging anatomy of the normal canine stifle joint. Vet J 2007, 174:351-361.
18. Snaps F, Park R, Saunders J. Magnetic resonance arthrography of the cubital joint in dogs affected with fragmented medial coronoid processes. Am J Vet Res 1999, 60:190-193.
19. Lamb C, Wong K. Ultrasonographic anatomy of the canine elbow. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005, 46:319-325.
20. Benjamin M, Milz S, Bydder GM. Magnetic resonance imaging of enthuses. Part 1. Clin Radiol 2008, 63:691-703.
21. Busoni V, Snaps F. Effect of deep digital flexor tendon orientation on magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity in isolated equine limbs-the magic angle effect. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2002, 43:428-430.
22. Murray RC, Dyson S. Image interpretation and artifacts. Clin Tech Equine Pract 2007, 6:16-25.
23. Burton L, Anderson M, Pannunzio M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the elbow: update on current technique and interpretation. J Hand Surg 2006, 31:1001-1011.