What makes a species central in a cleaning mutualism network?

Oikos

Volumn 119, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1319-1325

  Sazima, Cristina ^a   Guimarães, Paulo R ^b,c   dos Reis, Sérgio F ^a   Sazima, Ivan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; CLEANER FISH; CORAL REEF; CORRELATION; FEEDING; MARINE ECOSYSTEM; MUTUALISM; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ANIMALIA; PISCES;

EID: 77955151048     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.18222.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Barthélemy M. Betweenness centrality in large complex networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 2004, 38:163-168.
2. Bascompte J. Disentangling the web of life. Science 2009, 325:416-419.
3. Bascompte J, Jordano P. The structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Ecological networks: linking structure to dynamics in food webs 2006, 143-159. Pascual M, Dunne J. In:, (eds),, Oxford Univ. Press.
4. Bascompte J, Jordano P. Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007, 38:567-593.
5. Bascompte J. The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100:9383-9387.
6. Blüthgen N. What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits? Ecology 2008, 89:3387-3399.
7. Bohnsack J A, Bannerot S P. A stationary visual census technique for quantitatively assessing community structure of coral reef fishes. NOAA Tech. Rep. 1986, 41:1-15.
8. Bshary R, Schäffer D. Choosy reef fish select cleaner fish that provide high-quality service. Anim. Behav. 2002, 63:557-564.
9. Bshary R. Do cleaning organisms reduce the stress response of client reef fish? Front. Zool. 2007, 4:21.
10. Estrada E. Characterization of topological keystone species local, global and " meso-scale" centralities in food webs. Ecol. Complex. 2007, 4:48-57.
11. Floeter S R. The macroecology of marine cleaning mutualisms. J. Anim. Ecol. 2007, 76:105-111.
12. Francini-Filho R B, Sazima I. A comparative study of cleaning activity of two reef fishes at Fernando de Noronha Archipelago, tropical west Atlantic. Environ. Biol. Fish 2008, 83:213-220.
13. Freeman L C. Centrality in social networks: I. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1979, 1:215-239.
14. Grutter A S. Parasite removal rates by the cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1996, 130:61-70.
15. Grutter A S. Cleaning mutualism in the sea. Marine parasitology 2005, 264-278. Rohde K. In:, (ed.),, CSIRO Publishing.
16. Grutter A S, Bshary R. Cleaner wrasse prefer client mucus: support for partner control mechanisms in cleaning interactions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2003, 270:242-244.
17. Grutter A S. Cleaner fish drives local fish diversity on coral reefs. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:64-67.
18. Guimarães P R. Asymmetries in specialization in ant-plant mutualistic networks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2006, 273:2041-2047.
19. Guimarães P R. Interaction intimacy affects structure and coevolutionary dynamics in mutualistic networks. Curr. Biol. 2007a, 17:1797-1803.
20. Guimarães P R. The nested structure of marine cleaning symbiosis: is it like flowers and bees? Biol. Lett. 2007b, 3:51-54.
21. Hubbell S P. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography 2001, Princeton Univ. Press
22. Jeong H. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 2001, 411:41-42.
23. Jordán F. Topological keystone species: measures of positional importance in food webs. Oikos 2006, 112:535-546.
24. Jordano P. Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions. Ecol. Lett. 2003, 6:69-81.
25. Jordano P. The ecological consequences of complex topology and nested structure in pollination webs. Plant-pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization 2006, 173-199. Waser N MOllerton J. In:, (eds),, Univ. of Chicago Press.
26. Koschützki D. Network centralities. Analysis of biological networks 2008, 65-84. Junker B HSchreiber F. In:, (eds),, Wiley.
27. Krishna A. A neutral-niche theory of nestedness in mutualistic networks. Oikos 2008, 117:1609-1618.
28. Leão Z M A N. Os recifes de coral do sul da Bahia. Corais do sul da Bahia 1994, 151-159. Hetzel BCastro C B. In:, (eds),, Nova Fronteira.
29. Lewinsohn T M. Structure in plant-animal interaction assemblages. Oikos 2006, 113:174-184.
30. Losey G S. Cleaning symbiosis. Symbiosis 1987, 4:229-258.
31. Martín González A M. Centrality measures and the importance of generalist species in pollination networks. Ecol. Complex. 2009, doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.03.008.
32. Newman M E J. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 2003, 45:167-256.
33. de Nooy W. Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek 2005, Cambridge Univ. Press
34. Olesen J M. The modularity of pollination networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:19891-19896.
35. Ollerton J. The pollination ecology of an assemblage of grassland asclepiads in South Africa. Ann. Bot. 2003, 92:807-834.
36. Ollerton J. Finding NEMO: nestedness engendered by mutualistic organization in anemonefish and their hosts. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2007, 274:591-598.
37. Randall J E. Food habits of reef fishes of the West Indies. Stud. Trop Oceanogr. Miami 1967, 5:665-847.
38. Rezende E L. Non-random coextinctions in phylo-genetically structured mutualistic networks. Nature 2007, 448:925-928.
39. Santamaría L, Rodríguez-Gironés M A. Linkage rules for plant-pollinator networks: trait complementarity or exploitation barriers? PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e31.
40. Sazima C, Sazima I. Plankton-feeding aggregation and occasional cleaning by adult butterflyfish, Chaetodon striatus (Chaetodontidae), in southwestern Atlantic. Cybium 2001, 25:145-151.
41. Sazima I. Gramma brasiliensis, a new basslet from the western south Atlantic (Perciformes: Grammatidae). Aqua 1998, 3:39-43.
42. Sazima I. Cleaning activity of juvenile angelfish, Pomacanthus paru, on the reefs of the Abrolhos Archipelago, western south Atlantic. Environ. Biol. Fishes 1999, 56:399-407.
43. Stang M. Size constraints and flower abundance determine the number of interactions in a plant-flower visitor web. Oikos 2006, 112:111-121.
44. Stang M. Asymmetric specialization and extinction risk in plant-flower visitor webs: a matter of morphology or abundance? Oecologia 2007, 151:442-453.
45. Thompson J N. The geographic mosaic of coevolution 2005, Univ. of Chicago Press
46. Vázquez D P. Degree distribution in plant-animal mutualistic networks: forbidden links or random interactions? Oikos 2005, 108:421-426.
47. Vázquez D P. Species abundance and the distribution of specialization in host-parasite interaction networks. J. Anim. Ecol. 2005, 74:946-955.
48. Vázquez D P. Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks. Oikos 2007, 116:1120-1127.